Electromechanical Frequency Filters

  • W. Wersing
  • K. Lubitz
Part of the Springer Series in Materials Science book series (SSMATERIALS, volume 114)
Frequency filters select signals with a frequency inside a definite frequency range or band from signals outside this band, traditionally afforded by a combination of L-C-resonators. The fundamental principle of all modern frequency filters is the constructive interference of travelling waves. If a filter is set up of coupled resonators, this interference occurs as a result of the successive wave reflection at the resonators’ ends. In this case, the center frequency f c of a filter, e.g., set up of symmetrical λ/2-resonators of length 1, is given by
$$f_c = f_r = v_{ph}/\lambda = v_{ph}/2l$$
, where v ph is the phase velocity of the wave. This clearly shows the big advantage of acoustic waves for filter applications in comparison to electro-magnetic waves. Because v ph of acoustic waves in solids is about 104–105 smaller than that of electro-magnetic waves, much smaller filters can be realised. Today, piezoelectric materials and processing technologies exist that electromechanical resonators and filters can be produced in the frequency range from 1 kHz up to 10 GHz. Further requirements for frequency filters such as low losses (high resonator Q) and low temperature coefficients of frequency constants can also be fulfilled with these filters. Important examples are quartz-crystal resonators and filters (1 kHz–200 MHz) as discussed in Chap. 2, electromechanical channel filters (50 kHz and 130 kHz) for long-haul communication systems as discussed in this section, surface acoustic wave (SAW) filters (20 MHz–5 GHz), as discussed in Chap. 14, and thin film bulk acoustic resonators (FBAR) and filters (500 MHz–10 GHz), as discussed in Chap. 15.

Keywords

Surface Acoustic Wave Coupling Factor Piezoelectric Ceramic Frequency Constant Morphotropic Phase Boundary 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    H. Albert, Feinwerktechnik 72, 244 (1968)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    A.E. Günther, H. Albsmeier, K. Traub, Proc. IEEE 67, 102 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    W. Wersing, Ferroelectrics 22, 813 (1978)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    H. Banno, T. Tsunooka, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 6, 954 (1967)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    R. Truell, C. Elbaum, B.B. Chick, Ultrasonic methods in Solid State Physics (Academic Press, New York, 1969) pp. 341–343Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    K. Carl, K.H. Härdtl, Ferroelectrics 17, 473 (1978)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    H. Schichl, NTZ 4, 299 (1976)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    M. Takahashi, N. Tsubouchi, M. Yonezawa, T. Ohno, T. Akashi, Nec Res. Develop. Jpn. 35, 57 (1974)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    W. Wersing, Ferroelectrics 37, 611 (1981)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    I.M. Lifschitz, L.N. Rosenzweig, J. Exp. Theoret. Phys. 16, 967 (1946)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    G. Zorn, W. Wersing, H. Göbel, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 24 suppl. 24–2, 721 (1985)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    J.O. Genter, P. Gerthsen, N.A. Schmidt, R.E. Send, J. Appl. Phys. 49, 4485 (1978)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    H.-J. Hagemann, J. Phys. C. Solid State Phys. 11, 3333 (1978)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    K.H. Härdtl, Ferroelectrics 24, 75 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    K. Möhring, H. Schichl, Ber. Deutsch. Keram. Ges. 53, 200 (1976)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. Wersing
    • 1
  • K. Lubitz
    • 2
  1. 1.BergenGermany
  2. 2.MünchenGermany

Personalised recommendations