Essentials of General Intelligence: The Direct Path to Artificial General Intelligence

  • Peter Voss
Part of the Cognitive Technologies book series (COGTECH)

9 Conclusion

Understanding general intelligence and identifying its essential components are key to building next-generation AI systems — systems that are far less expensive, yet significantly more capable. In addition to concentrating on general learning abilities, a fast-track approach should also seek a path of least resistance — one that capitalizes on human engineering strengths and available technology. Sometimes, this involves selecting the AI road less traveled.

I believe that the theoretical model, cognitive components, and framework described above, joined with my other strategic design decisions provide a solid basis for achieving practical AGI capabilities in the foreseeable future. Successful implementation will significantly address many traditional problems of AI. Potential benefits include:
  • minimizing initial environment-specific programming (through self-adaptive configuration);

  • substantially reducing ongoing software changes, because a large amount of additional functionality and knowledge will be acquired autonomously via self-supervised learning;

  • greatly increasing the scope of applications, as users teach and train additional capabilities; and

  • improved flexibility and robustness resulting from systems’ ability to adapt to changing data patterns, environments and goals.

AGI promises to make an important contribution toward realizing software and robotic systems that are more usable, intelligent, and human-friendly. The time seems ripe for a major initiative down this new path of human advancement that is now open to us.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Aha DW (ed) (1997) Lazy Learning. Artificial Intelligence Review, 11:1–5.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aleksander I (1996) Impossible Minds. Imperial College Press, London.MATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Arbib MA (1992) Schema theory. In: Shapiro S (ed), Encyclopedia of Artificial Intelligence, 2nd ed. John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Braitenberg V (1984) Vehicles: Experiments in Synthetic Psychology. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brooks RA, Stein LA (1993) Building Brains for Bodies. Memo 1439, Artificial Intelligence Lab, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brooks RA (1994) Coherent behavior from Many Adaptive Processes. In: Cliff D, Husbands P, Meyer JA, Wilson SW (eds), From animals to animats: Proceedings of the third International Conference on Simulation of Adaptive Behavior. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Churchland PM (1995) The Engine of Reason, the Seat of the Soul: A Philosophical Journey into the Brain. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Clark A (1997) Being There: Putting Brain, Body and World Together Again. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Drescher GI (1991) A Constructivist Approach to Intelligence. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.MATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fritzke B (1995) AF Growing Neural Gas Network Learns Topologies. In: Tesauro G, Touretzky DS, Leen TK (eds), Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 7. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Goertzel B (1997) From Complexity to Creativity. Plenum Press, New York.MATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Goertzel B (2001) Creating Internet Intelligence. Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Goldstone RL (1998) Perceptual Learning. Annual Review of Psychology, 49:585–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gottfredson LS (1998) The General Intelligence Factor. Scientific American, 9(4):24–29.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Grimson WEL, Stauffer C, Lee L, Romano R (1998) Using Adaptive Tracking to Classify and Monitor Activities in a Site. Proc. IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Harnad S (1990) The Symbol Grounding Problem. Physica D, 42:335–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kelley D (1986) The Evidence of the Senses. Louisiana State University Press, Baton Rouge, LA.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kosko B (1997) Fuzzy Engineering. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.MATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lenat D, Guha R (1990) Building Large Knowledge Based Systems. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Margolis H (1987) Patterns, Thinking, and Cognition: A Theory of Judgment. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    McCarthy J, Hayes P (1969) Some Philosophical Problems from the Standpoint of Artificial Intelligence. Machine Intelligence, 4:463–502.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Nenov VI, Dyer MG (1994) Language Learning via Perceptual/Motor Association: A Massively Parallel Model. In: Kitano H, Hendler JA (eds), Massively Parallel Artificial Intelligence, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Pfeifer R, Scheier C (1999) Understanding Intelligence. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Picard RW (1997) Affective Computing. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Pylyshyn ZW (ed) (1987) The Robot’s Dilemma: The Frame Problem in A.I. Ablex, Norwood, NJ.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Rand A (1990) Introduction to Objectivist Epistemology. Meridian, New York.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Russell S, Norvig P (1995) Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Yip K, Sussman GJ (1997) Sparse Representations for Fast, One-shot Learning. Proc. of National Conference on Artificial Intelligence.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter Voss
    • 1
  1. 1.Adaptive A.I., Inc.Marina del ReyUSA

Personalised recommendations