Advertisement

Legal Foundations, Structures and Institutions of Autonomy in Comparative Law

  • Markku Suksi
Conference paper

Autonomies around the world1 as a form of organization at the sub-national level show a number of common features or dimensions that offer a basis for comparisons. The comparisons, in turn, can be used for the purposes of explaining the legal effects of various forms of autonomy and for outlining the reasons for differences and similarities. What are the key features of autonomy, how could different autonomies be compared with each other and what is the future of autonomy as a form of organization? How could the different autonomies and their relations to each other be illustrated in the visual form, as a chart, so as to make it possible to identify the multitude of different models of autonomy on the basis of their normative features?

For such a comparative exercise to take place, a common framework or platform of comparison should be designed. In other words, a so-called tertium comparationis should be developed. For the purposes of our discussion of autonomy, it is proposed that this tertium comparationis is created against the background of the right to participation in a broad sense, encompassing both the general right to participation as identified in article 25 of the Covenant on Civil and Political Rights on the one hand and the right to self-determination as a meta-right of participation as pointed at in article 1 of the same Covenant.

Keywords

Faroe Island Special Administrative Region National Parliament Legal Foundation Legislative Power 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ackrén M (2005) Territoriella autonomier i världen — En empirisk studie av de självstyrda områdena i världen. Ålands fredsinstitut, MariehamnGoogle Scholar
  2. Bartole S (1998) Regionalism and federalism in the Italian constitutional experience. Suksi M (ed.) Autonomy: applications and implications. Kluwer Law International, The HagueGoogle Scholar
  3. Nascimento Cabrita EN (2002) International and constitutional limitations on the autonomy of the Macao Special Administrative Region. Macau Law J 2002 (Special Issue) The Basic Laws: Problems and PerspectivesGoogle Scholar
  4. Daftary F (2008) Experimenting with territorial administrative autonomy: Corsica within the Unitary French State. Int J on Minority and Group Rights 15 (2008), pp. 273–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Eide A (1998) Cultural autonomy: concept, content, history and role in the world order. In: Suksi M (ed.) Autonomy: applications and implications. Kluwer Law International, The HagueGoogle Scholar
  6. Harhoff F (1993) Rigsfaelleskabet. Klim, ÅrhusGoogle Scholar
  7. Himsworth CMG (2007) Devolution and its jurisdictional asymmetries. Mod Law Rev 70(1):31–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Leopold P (1998) Autonomy and the British constitution. In: Suksi M (ed.) Autonomy: applications and implications. Kluwer Law International, The HagueGoogle Scholar
  9. Lyck L (1996) The Danish home rule model. Principles, history, and characteristics. In: Lyck L (ed.) Constitutional and economic space of the small Nordic jurisdictions. NordREFO 1996 (6):124. Nordiska institutet för regionalpolitisk forskning, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  10. Mørkøre J (1996) The Faroese home rule model — theory and reality. In: Lyck L (ed.) Constitutional and economic space of the small Nordic jurisdictions. NordREFO 1996(6):164. Nordiska institutet för regionalpolitisk forskning, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  11. Olafsson A (1996) A note on the Faroe Islands. In: Local self-government, territorial integrity and protection of minorities. Proceedings of the European Commission for Democracy through Law, Lausanne, 25–27 April 1996. Collection Science and technique of democracy, No. 16. Council of Europe, StrasbourgGoogle Scholar
  12. Suksi M (1998) On the entrenchment of autonomy. In: Suksi M (ed.) Autonomy: applications and implications. Kluwer Law International, The HagueGoogle Scholar
  13. Suksi M (1999) On the constitutional features of Estonia. Åbo Akademis tryckeri, ÅboGoogle Scholar
  14. Suksi M (2005a) Keeping the lid on the secession kettle — a review of legal interpretations concerning claims of self-determination by minority populations. Int J Minority Rights Group Rights 12:2005Google Scholar
  15. Suksi M (2005b) Participation in development through “emergence into any other political status”: with special reference to Africa. In: Scheinin M, Suksi M (eds.) Empowerment, participation, accountability and non-discrimination: operationalising a human rights-based approach to development. Human Rights in Development Yearbook 2002. Martinus Nijhoff, LeidenGoogle Scholar
  16. Zahle H (1989) Dansk forfatningsret 2: Regering, forvaltning og dom. Christian Ejlers' Forlag, KøbenhavnGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Markku Suksi
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of LawÅbo Akademi UniversityTurku/ÅboFinland

Personalised recommendations