Advertisement

Variables of Aesthetics in Maps

  • Felix Ortag
Chapter
Part of the Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography book series (LNGC)

Abstract

Cartographers do not continuously work to strict rules when they design a map, some map elements are mainly designed by personal preferences, experience and habits. In this process the map creator considers aesthetics. In order to optimise this part of mapping it would be useful to know the variables of aesthetics: Which graphic elements and attributes of a map are considered when it’s beauty is assessed? Colours, line styles, relief visualisation, font types, legend, map margin, overall impression, symphony of colours, composition, …?

This chapter gives an overview of aesthetics in cartography and presents the results of a focussed interview which was done with 152 persons, where three exemplary topographic maps were compared to find out, how the beauty of maps is assessed.

Keywords

Test Person Graphic Design Golden Ratio Visual Variable Line Style 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bertin J (1967) Semiology of graphics: diagrams, networks, maps. University of Wisconsin Press, 1983 (first published in French in 1967, translated to English by Berg WJ in 1983)Google Scholar
  2. Carpendale MST (2003) Considering Visual Variables as a Basis for Information Visualisation. Department of Computer Science, The University of Calgary. http://pharos.cpsc.ucalgary.ca/Dienst/UI/2.0/Describe/ncstrl.ucalgary_cs/2001-693-16. Accessed 9 June 2008
  3. Di Dio C, Macaluso E, Rizzolatti G (2007) The Golden Beauty: Brain Response to Classical and Renaissance Sculptures. PLoS ONE 2(11):e1201. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0001201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Franck G (1998) Ökonomie der Aufmerksamkeit. Carl Hanser Verlag, MünchenGoogle Scholar
  5. Freitag U (1971)Semiotik und Kartographie. Kartographische Nachrichten 21:171–182Google Scholar
  6. Imhof E (1965) Kartographische Geländedarstellung. De Gruyter, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  7. Karvonen K (2000) The Beauty of Simplicity. Proceedings on the 2000 conference on Universal Usability. ACM, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. López FJA, Balboa JLG (2008) Approximating Cartography to the Customer’s Expectations: Applying the House of Quality“ to Map Design. Cartographica 43:107–123. doi:10.3138/ carto.43.2.107Google Scholar
  9. Zipf A (2002) User-Adaptive Maps for Location-Based Services (LBS) for Tourism. Proceedings of ENTER Communications Technologies in Tourism, Innsbruck, Austria. Springer Computer Science, Heidelberg, BerlinGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Felix Ortag
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Geoinformation and CartographyVienna University of TechnologyAustria

Personalised recommendations