Advertisement

ompP: A Profiling Tool for OpenMP

  • Karl Fürlinger
  • Michael Gerndt
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4315)

Abstract

In this paper we present a simple but useful profiling tool for OpenMP applications similar in spirit to the MPI profiler mpiP [16]. We describe the implementation of our tool and demonstrate its functionality on a number of test applications.

Keywords

Critical Section Load Imbalance Parallel Region Region Descriptor Exit Barrier 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Dorta, A.J., Rodríguez, C., de Sande, F., Gonzáles-Escribano, A.: The OpenMP source code repository. In: Proceedings of the 13th Euromicro Conference on Parallel, Distributed and Network-Based Processing (PDP 2005), February 2005, pp. 244–250 (2005)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gerndt, M., Mohr, B., Träff, J.L.: Evaluating OpenMP performance analysis tools with the APART test suite. In: Danelutto, M., Vanneschi, M., Laforenza, D. (eds.) Euro-Par 2004. LNCS, vol. 3149, pp. 155–162. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Graham, S.L., Kessler, P.B., McKusick, M.K.: gprof: A call graph execution profiler. SIGPLAN Not. 17(6), 120–126 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
  5. 5.
  6. 6.
  7. 7.
    Malony, A.D., Shende, S.S.: Performance technology for complex parallel and distributed systems, pp. 37–46 (2000)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Malony, A.D., Shende, S.S.: Overhead Compensation in Performance Profiling. In: Danelutto, M., Vanneschi, M., Laforenza, D. (eds.) Euro-Par 2004. LNCS, vol. 3149, pp. 119–132. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    May, J., Gyllenhaal, J.: Tool Gear: Infrastructure for parallel tools. In: Proceedings of the 2003 International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Processing Techniques and Applications (PDPTA 2003), pp. 231–240 (2003)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mohr, B., Malony, A.D., Shende, S.S., Wolf, F.: Towards a performance tool interface for OpenMP: An approach based on directive rewriting. In: Proceedings of the Third Workshop on OpenMP (EWOMP 2001) (September 2001)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mohr, B., Träff, J.L.: Initial design of a test suite for automatic performance analysis tools. In: Eighth International Workshop on High-Level Parallel Programming Models and Supportive Environments (HIPS 2003), pp. 77–86 (2003)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nagel, W.E., Arnold, A., Weber, M., Hoppe, H.-C., Solchenbach, K.: VAMPIR: Visualization and analysis of MPI resources. Supercomputer 12(1), 69–90 (1996)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
  14. 14.
  15. 15.
    Süß, M., Leopold, C.: A user’s experience with parallel sorting and OpenMP. In: Proceedings of the Sixth Workshop on OpenMP (EWOMP 2004) (October 2004)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Vetter, J.S., Mueller, F.: Communication characteristics of large-scale scientific applications for contemporary cluster architectures. J. Parallel Distrib. Comput. 63(9), 853–865 (2003)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wolf, F., Mohr, B.: Automatic performance analysis of hybrid MPI/OpenMP applications. In: Proceedings of the 11th Euromicro Conference on Parallel, Distributed and Network-Based Processing (PDP 2003), February 2003, pp. 13–22. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Karl Fürlinger
    • 1
  • Michael Gerndt
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut für Informatik, Lehrstuhl für Rechnertechnik und RechnerorganisationTechnische Universität München 

Personalised recommendations