Broadword Implementation of Rank/Select Queries

  • Sebastiano Vigna
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5038)


Research on succinct data structures (data structures occupying space close to the information-theoretical lower bound, but achieving speed similar to their standard counterparts) has steadily increased in the last few years. However, many theoretical constructions providing asymptotically optimal bounds are unusable in practise because of the very large constants involved. The study of practical implementations of the basic building blocks of such data structures is thus fundamental to obtain practical applications. In this paper we argue that 64-bit and wider architectures are particularly suited to very efficient implementations of rank (counting the number of ones up to a given position) and select (finding the position of the i-th bit set), two essential building blocks of all succinct data structures. Contrarily to typical 32-bit approaches, involving precomputed tables, we use pervasively broadword (a.k.a. SWAR—“SIMD in A Register”) programming, which compensates the constant burden associated to succinct structures by solving problems in parallel in a register. We provide an implementation named rank9 that addresses 264 bits, consumes less space and is significantly faster then current state-of-the-art 32-bit implementations, and a companion select9 structure that selects in nearly constant time using only access to aligned data. For sparsely populated arrays, we provide a simple broadword implementation of the Elias–Fano representation of monotone sequences. In doing so, we develop broadword algorithms for performing selection in a word or in a sequence of words that are of independent interest.


Basic Block Monotone Sequence Sparse Array Space Occupancy Essential Building Block 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Jacobson, G.: Space-efficient static trees and graphs. In: 30th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, pp. 549–554. IEEE, Los Alamitos (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Golynski, A.: Optimal lower bounds for rank and select indexes. In: Bugliesi, M., Preneel, B., Sassone, V., Wegener, I. (eds.) ICALP 2006. LNCS, vol. 4051, pp. 370–381. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gonzàlez, R., Grabowski, S., Mäkinen, V., Navarro, G.: Practical implementation of rank and select queries. In: Poster Proceedings Volume of 4th Workshop on Efficient and Experimental Algorithms (WEA 2005), pp. 27–38. CTI Press, Ellinika Grammata (2005)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Knuth, D.E.: The Art of Computer Programming. Pre-Fascicle 1A. Draft of Section 7.1.3: Bitwise Tricks and Techniques (2007)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fisher, R.J., Dietz, H.G.: Compiling for SIMD within a register. In: Carter, L., Ferrante, J., Sehr, D., Chatterjee, S., Prins, J.F., Li, Z., Yew, P.-C. (eds.) LCPC 1998. LNCS, vol. 1656, pp. 290–304. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lamport, L.: Multiple byte processing with full-word instructions. Comm. ACM 18(8), 471–475 (1975)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fredman, M.L., Willard, D.E.: Surpassing the information theoretic bound with fusion trees. J. Comput. System Sci. 47(3), 424–436 (1993)zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Geary, R.F., Rahman, N., Raman, R., Raman, V.: A simple optimal representation for balanced parentheses. In: Sahinalp, S.C., Muthukrishnan, S.M., Dogrusoz, U. (eds.) CPM 2004. LNCS, vol. 3109, pp. 159–172. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dijkstra, E.W.: Why numbering should start at zero. EWD, p. 831 (1982)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Okanohara, D., Sadakane, K.: Practical entropy-compressed rank/select dictionary. In: Proc. of the Workshop on Algorithm Engineering and Experiments, ALENEX 2007, SIAM, Philadelphia (2007)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Elias, P.: Efficient storage and retrieval by content and address of static files. J. Assoc. Comput. Mach. 21(2), 246–260 (1974)zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fano, R.M.: On the number of bits required to implement an associative memory. In: Memorandum 61, Computer Structures Group, Project MAC, MIT, Cambridge, Mass., n.d (1971)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kim, D.K., Na, J.C., Kim, J.E., Park, K.: Efficient implementation of rank and select functions for succinct representation. In: Nikoletseas, S.E. (ed.) WEA 2005. LNCS, vol. 3503, pp. 315–327. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Clark, D.R.: Compact Pat Trees. PhD thesis, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ont., Canada (1998)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Delpratt, O., Rahman, N., Raman, R.: Compressed prefix sums. In: van Leeuwen, J., Italiano, G.F., van der Hoek, W., Meinel, C., Sack, H., Plášil, F. (eds.) SOFSEM 2007. LNCS, vol. 4362, pp. 235–247. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sebastiano Vigna
    • 1
  1. 1.Dipartimento di Scienze dell’InformazioneUniversità degli Studi di MilanoItaly

Personalised recommendations