On the Evolutionary Modification of Self-Incompatibility: Implications of Partial Clonality for Allelic Diversity and Genealogical Structure
Experimental investigations of homomorphic self-incompatibility (SI) have revealed an unanticipated level of complexity in its expression, permitting fine regulation over the course of a lifetime or a range of environmental conditions. Many flowering plants express some level of clonal reproduction, and phylogenetic analyses suggest that clonality evolves in a correlated fashion with SI in Solanum (Solanaceae). Here, we use a diffusion approximation to explore the effects on the evolutionary dynamics of SI of vegetative propagation with SI restricted to reproduction through seed. While clonality reduces the strength of frequency-dependent selection maintaining S-allele diversity, much of the great depth typical of S-allele genealogies is preserved. Our results suggest that clonality can play an important role in the evolution of SI systems, and may afford insight into unexplained features of allele genealogies in the Solanaceae.
KeywordsEffective Population Size Diffusion Approximation Clonal Reproduction Much Recent Common Ancestor Correlate Evolution
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Anderson MA, Cornish EC, Mau SL, Williams EG, Hoggart R, Atkinson A, Bonig I, Grego B, Simpson R, Roche PJ, Haley JD, Penschow JD, Niall HD, Tregear GW, Coghlan JP, Crawford RJ, Clarke AE (1986) Cloning of cDNA for a stylar glycoprotein associated with expression of self-incompatibility in Nicotiana alata. Nature 321:38-44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Barrett S (1988). The evolution, maintenance, and loss of self-incompatibility systems. In: Lovett Doust J, Lovett Doust L (eds) Plant reproductive ecology: Patterns and strategies. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 98-124Google Scholar
- Fisher RA (1958) The genetical theory of natural selection, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Dover, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Honnay O, Jacquemyn H (2008) Mating system evolution under strong clonality: towards self-compatibility or self-incompatibility? Evol Ecol DOI 10.1007/s10682-007-9207-3Google Scholar
- Karlin S, Taylor HM (1981) A second course in stochastic processes. Academic, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Pagel MD (1994) Detecting correlated evolution on phylogenies: A general method for the comparative analysis of discrete characters. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 255:37-45Google Scholar
- Richards AJ (1986) Plant breeding systems. George Allen & Unwin, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Stebbins GL (1974) Flowering plants: Evolution above the species level. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
- Stone JL (2004) Sheltered load associated with S-alleles in Solanum carolinense. Am J Bot 92:335-342Google Scholar
- Uyenoyama MK, Takebayashi N (2004) Genus-specific diversification of mating types. In: Singh R, Uyenoyama MK (eds) The evolution of population biology. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 254-271Google Scholar