Heterogeneous Object Design: An Integrated CAX Perspective

  • X. Y. Kou
  • S. T. Tan
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4889)


CAD modeling, analysis of properties and fabrication of heterogeneous objects have been extensively studied in the past few decades. Conventionally these topics are separately investigated in CAD, CAE and CAM communities. Such explicit separations, however, suffer from some apparent limitations. This article presents an alternative scheme to consider the heterogeneous object design problem in an integrated CAX (CAD/CAE/CAM) framework. The motivation is to design heterogeneous objects which not only look right, but also functionally work right. In addition to the data representation, model constructions and visualizations, other considerations such as data communications to and from CAE/CAM modules, fabrication efficiency in layered manufacturing etc., are also considered. The presented CAX based design method facilitates design tools integration and enhances the interoperability in the entire design process.


Rapid Prototype Child Node Functionally Grade Material Material Distribution CAD4D Modeler 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Cho, W., et al.: Local composition control in solid freeform fabrication. In: Proceedings of the 2002 NSF Design, Service and Manufacturing Grantees and Research Conference, San Juan, Puerto Rico (2002)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Huang, J., et al.: Bi-objective optimization design of functionally gradient materials. Materials & Design 23(7), 657–666 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Elishakoff, I., Gentilini, C., Viola, E.: Three-dimensional analysis of an all-round clamped plate made of functionally graded materials. Acta Mechanica 180(1 - 4), 21–36 (2005)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Eraslan, A., Akis, T.: On the plane strain and plane stress solutions of functionally graded rotating solid shaft and solid disk problems. Acta Mechanica 181(1 - 2), 43–63 (2006)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cho, J.R., Shin, S.W.: Material composition optimization for heat-resisting FGMs by artificial neural network. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing 35(5), 585–594 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Praveen, G.N., Reddy, J.N.: Nonlinear transient thermoelastic analysis of functionally graded ceramic-metal plates. International Journal of Solids and Structures 35(33), 4457–4476 (1998)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cho, J.R., Ha, D.Y.: Optimal tailoring of 2D volume-fraction distributions for heat-resisting functionally graded materials using FDM. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 191(29-30), 3195–3211 (2002)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hu, Y., Blouin, V.Y., Fadel, G.M.: Design for manufacturing of 3D heterogeneous objects with processing time considerations. In: Proceedings of ASME 2005 Design Engineering Technical Conferences, Long Beach, California USA, September 24-28 (2005)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jackson, T.R.: Analysis of functionally graded material object representation methods, Ph.D. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2000)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pasko, A., et al.: Constructive hypervolume modeling. Graphical Models 63(6), 413 (2001)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Adzhiev, V., Kartasheva, E.: Cellular-functional modeling of heterogeneous objects. In: Proceedings of the seventh ACM symposium on Solid modeling and applications, Germany (2002)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hua, J., He, Y., Qin, H.: Multiresolution heterogeneous solid modeling and visualization using trivariate simplex splines. In: Proceedings of the Ninth ACM Symposium on Solid Modeling and Applications, Genova, Italy, June 2004, p. 47 (2004)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Martin, W., Cohen, E.: Representation and extraction of volumetric attributes using trivariate splines: a mathematical framework. In: Proceedings of the sixth ACM symposium on Solid modeling and applications, p. 234 (2001)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Siu, Y.K.: Modeling and prototyping of heterogeneous solid CAD models, PhD Thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Hong Kong (2003)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Samanta, K., Koc, B.: Feature-based design and material blending for free-form heterogeneous object modeling. Computer-Aided Design 37(3), 287 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Biswas, A., Shapiro, V., Tsukanov, I.: Heterogeneous material modeling with distance fields. Computer Aided Geometric Design 21(3), 215–242 (2004)zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Liu, H., et al.: Methods for feature-based design of heterogeneous solids. Computer-Aided Design 36(12), 1141 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kou, X.Y., Tan, S.T.: A hierarchical representation for heterogeneous object modeling. Computer-Aided Design 37(3), 307 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kumar, V., Dutta, D.: Approach to modeling & representation of heterogeneous objects. Journal of Mechanical Design, Transactions of the ASME 120(4), 659–667 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sun, W., Hu, X.: Reasoning Boolean operation based modeling for heterogeneous objects. Computer-Aided Design 34(6), 481 (2002)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Cavalcanti, P.R., Carvalho, P.C.P., Martha, L.F.: Non-manifold modelling: an approach based on spatial subdivision. Computer-Aided Design 29(3), 209 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kou, X.Y., Tan, S.T., Sze, W.S.: Modeling complex heterogeneous objects with non-manifold heterogeneous cells. Computer-Aided Design 38(5), 457–474 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Chen, M., Tucker, J.V.: Constructive volume geometry. Computer Graphics Forum 19(4), 281–293 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Adzhiev, V., et al.: Hybrid cellular-functional modeling of heterogeneous objects. Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering 2(4), 312 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kou, X.Y., Tan, S.T.: Heterogeneous object modeling: A review. Computer-Aided Design 39(4), 284–301 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kou, X.Y.: Computer-Aided Design of Heterogeneous Objects, PhD Thesis, The University of Hong Kong (2006)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kou, X.Y., Tan, S.T.: A systematic approach for Integrated Computer-aided design and finite element analysis of Functionally-Graded-Material objects. Materials & Design 28(10), 2549–2565 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
  29. 29.
    Corney, J.: 3D modeling with the ACIS kernel and toolkit, vol. xix, p. 294. J. Wiley & Sons, Chichester, New York (1997)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
  31. 31.
    Kou, X.Y., Tan, S.T.: Robust and efficient algorithms for rapid prototyping of heterogeneous objects. Technical Report CADTR01/07, Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Hong Kong (2007), Available at:
  32. 32.
    Qian, X., Dutta, D.: Heterogeneous object modeling through direct face neighborhood alteration. Computers & Graphics 27(6), 943 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
  34. 34.
    Kou, X.Y., Tan, S.T.: An intractive CAD environment for heterogeneous object design. In: Proceedings of ASME 2004 Design Engineering Technical Conferences, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA, September 28-October 2 (2004)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • X. Y. Kou
    • 1
  • S. T. Tan
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringThe University of Hong KongHong Kong 

Personalised recommendations