Advertisement

Heterogeneous Modeling of Biological Organs and Organ Growth

  • Roman Ďurikovič
  • Silvester Czanner
  • Július Parulek
  • Miloš Šrámek
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4889)

Abstract

The growth of the organs of human embryo is changing significantly over a short period of time in the mother body. The shape of the human organs is organic and has many folds that are difficult to model or animate with conventional techniques. Convolution surface and function representation are a good choice in modelling such organs as human embryo stomach and brain. Two approaches are proposed for animating the organ growth: First, uses a simple line segment skeleton demonstrated on a stomach model and the other method uses a tubular skeleton calculated automatically from a 2D object outline. The growth speed varies with the position within the organ and thus the model is divided into multiple geometric primitives that are later glued by a blending operation. Animation of both the embryo stomach and brain organs is shown.

Keywords

Human Embryo Growth Function Organ Growth Biological Organ Heterogeneous Modeling 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Ďurikovič, R., Kaneda, K., Yamashita, H.: Imaging and modelling from serial microscopic sections for the study of anatomy. IEEE Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing 36(3), 276–284 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ďurikovič, R., Kaneda, K., Yamashita, H.: Animation of biological organ growth based on l-systems. Computer Graphics Forum (EUROGRAPHICS 1998) 17(3), 1–13 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Smith, C., Prusinkiewicz, P.: Simulation modeling of growing tissues. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Functional-Structural Plant Models, pp. 365–370 (2004)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Felkel, P., Fuhrmann, A., Kanitsar, A., Wegenkittl, R.: Surface reconstruction of the branching vessels for augmented reality aided surgery. In: Proceedings of the Biosignal, pp. 252–2549 (2002)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tsingos, N., Bittar, E., Gascuel, M.P.: Implicit surfaces for semi-automatic medical organ reconstruction. In: Earnshaw, R., Vince, J. (eds.) Computer Graphics, development in virtual environments, proceedings of Computer Graphics International 1995, Leeds, UK, May 1995, Academic Press, London (1995)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tait, R., Schaefer, G., Kühnapfel, U., Çakmak, H.K.: Interactive spline modelling of human organs for surgical simulators. In: 17th European Simulation Multiconference, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, England, pp. 355–359 (2003) ISBN 3-936150-25-7Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Amrani, M., Jaillet, F., Melkemi, M., Shariat, B.: Simulation of deformable organs with a hybrid approach. In: In Proceedings of the Revue Int. d’infographie et de la CFAO (2001)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Leymarie, F.F., Kimia, B.B.: Shock scaffolds for 3d shapes in medical applications. In: DIMACS Workshop on Medical Applications in Computational Geometry, DIMACS Center, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ (2003)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Attali, D., Montanvert, A.: Semi-continuous skeletons of 2D and 3D shapes in C. World Scientific, New York (1994)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pasko, A., Adzhiev, V., Sourin, A., Savchenko, V.: Function representation in geometric modeling: concepts, implementation and applications. The Visual Computer 11(8), 429–446 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sadler, T.W.: Langman’s medical embryology, 7th edn. Williams & Wilkins, New York (1995)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mech, R., Prusinkiewicz, P.: Visual models of plants interacting with their environment. In: SIGGRAPH, pp. 397–410 (1996)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ďurikovič, R.: Growth simulation of digestive system using function representation and skeleton dynamics. International Journal on Shape Modeling 10(1), 31–49 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Prusinkiewicz, P., Lindenmayer, A., Hanan, J.: Development models of herbaceous plants for computer imagery purposes. In: SIGGRAPH 1988: Proceedings of the 15th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques, pp. 141–150. ACM Press, New York (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Duchon, J.: Splines minimizing rotation-invariant semi-norms in Sobolev spaces. In: Schempp, W., Zeller, K. (eds.) Constructive Theory of Functions of Several Variables. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 571, pp. 85–100. Springer, Heidelberg (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Savchenko, V., Pasko, A.: Transformation of functionally defined shapes by extended space mappings. The Visual Computer 14(5-6), 257–270 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Edelstein-Keshet, L.: Mathematical models in biology. McGraw-Hill, New York (1988)zbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Roman Ďurikovič
    • 1
    • 2
  • Silvester Czanner
    • 3
  • Július Parulek
    • 2
    • 5
  • Miloš Šrámek
    • 2
    • 4
  1. 1.University of Saint Cyril and MetodTrnavaSlovakia
  2. 2.Faculty of Mathematics, Physics and InformaticsComenius UniversitySlovakia
  3. 3.Warwick Manufacturing GroupUniversity of WarwickUK
  4. 4.Austrian Academy of SciencesAustria
  5. 5.Institute of Molecular Physiology and GeneticsSlovak Academy of SciencesSlovakia

Personalised recommendations