Identifying and Improving Reusability Based on Coupling Patterns

  • Andrea Capiluppi
  • Cornelia Boldyreff
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5030)

Abstract

Open Source Software (OSS) communities have not yet taken full advantage of reuse mechanisms. Typically many OSS projects which share the same application domain and topic, duplicate effort and code, without fully leveraging the vast amounts of available code.

This study proposes the empirical evaluation of source code folders of OSS projects in order to determine their actual internal reuse and their potential as shareable, fine-grained and externally reusable software components by future projects.

This paper empirically analyzes four OSS systems, identifies which components (in the form of folders) are currently being reused internally and studies their coupling characteristics. Stable components (i.e., those which act as service providers rather than service consumers) are shown to be more likely to be reusable. As a means of supporting replication of these successful instances of OSS reuse, source folders with similar patterns are extracted from the studied systems, and identified as externally reusable components.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Arisholm, E., Briand, L.C., Foyen, A.: Dynamic Coupling Measurement for Object-Oriented Software. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 30(8), 491–506 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aoki, A., Hayashi, K., Kishida, K., Nakakoji, K., Nishinaka, Y., Reeves, B., Takashima, A., Yamamoto, Y.: A case study of the evolution of jun: an object-oriented open-source 3d multimedia library. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Software Engineering, Toronto, Canada, ICSE, pp. 524–533 (2001)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Basili, V.R., Rombach, H.D.: Support for Comprehensive Reuse. IEEE Software Engineering Journal 6(5), 303–316 (1991)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Beecher, K., Boldyreff, C., Capiluppi, A., Rank, S.: Evolutionary Success of Open Source Software: an Investigation into Exogenous Drivers. In: Electronic Communications of the EASST: ERCIM Symposium on Software Evolution, vol. 17(8) (2007)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Briand, L.C., Morasca, S., Basili, V.R.: Property-based Software Engineering Measurement. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 22(1), 68–86 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Capiluppi, A.: Models for the Evolution of OS Projects. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Maintenance, Amsterdam, Netherlands, pp. 65–74 (2003)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Capiluppi, A., Lago, P., Morisio, M.: Evidences in the Evolution of OS Projects Through Changelog Analyses. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Open Source Software Engineering, Portland, OR, USA, ICSE (2003)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Capiluppi, A., Morisio, M., Ramil, J.F.: Structural Analysis of Open Source Systems. In: Madhavji, N.H., Ramil, J.F., Perry, D. (eds.) Software Evolution and Feedback: Theory and Practice, pp. 207–222. Wiley, Chichester (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Capiluppi, A., Morisio, M., Ramil, J.F.: The Evolution of Source Folder Structure in Actively Evolved Open Source Systems. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Software Metrics Symposium, pp. 2–13 (2004)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Carney, D.: Assembling Large Systems from COTS Components: Opportunities, Cautions, and Complexities. Technical report, SEI Monographs on the Use of Commercial Software in Government Systems (1997)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ducasse, S., Lanza, M., Ponisio, L.: Butterflies: A visual Approach to Characterize Packages. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Software Metrics Symposium (2005)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ellson, J., Gansner, E., Koutsofios, L., North, S.C., Woodhull, G.: Graphviz, Open Source Graph Drawing Tools (2002)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fenton, N.E., Pfleeger, S.L.: Software Metrics: a Practical and Rigorous Approach. Thomson (1996)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Koch, S., Schneider, G.: Effort, Cooperation and Coordination in an Open Source Software Project: GNOME. Information Systems Journal 12(1), 27–42 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    German, D.M.: Using Software Trails to Reconstruct the Evolution of Software. Journal of Software Maintenance and Evolution: Research and Practice 16(6), 367–384 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Godfrey, M.W., Tu, Q.: Evolution in Open Source Software: A Case Study. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Maintenance, San Jose, CA, USA, pp. 131–142 (2000)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gorton, I., Zhu, L.: Tool Support for Just-In-Time Architecture Reconstruction and Evaluation: an Experience Report. In: Proceedings of the 27th international conference on Software engineering, pp. 514–523 (2005)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hofmeister, C., Nord, R., Soni, D.: Applied Software Architecture. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2000)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kruchten, P.: The 4+1 View Model of Architecture. IEEE Software 12(5), 88–93 (1995)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lang, B., Abramatic, J.F., Gonzalez-Barahona, J.M., Gomez, P., Pedersen, M.K.: GI 1975. In: Mühlbacher, J.R. (ed.) GI 1975. LNCS, vol. 34(12), p. 2. Springer, Heidelberg (1975)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Li, W., Henry, S.: Object-oriented Metrics that Predict Maintainability. Journal of Systems and Software 23(2), 111–122 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Llorens, J., Fuentes, J., Astudillo, H.: Incremental Software Reuse. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Reuse, Torino, Italy, ICSR (2006)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lungu, M., Lanza, M., Girba, T.: Package Patterns for Visual Architecture Recovery. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering, pp. 32–41 (2006)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Martin, R.C.: Agile Software Development, Principles, Patterns, and Practices. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (2002)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Matsumoto, Y.: Some Experience in Promoting Reusable Software Presentation in Higher Abstraction Levels. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 12(1), 43–60 (2004)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    McClure, C.: Software Reuse Techniques. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1997)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Medvidovic, N., Jakobac, V.: Using Software Evolution to Focus Architectural Recovery. Automated Software Engineering 13(2), 225–256 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Mockus, A., Fielding, R.T., Herbsleb, J.D.: Two Case Studies of Open Source Software Development: Apache and Mozilla. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology 11(3), 309–346 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Mohagheghi, P., Conradi, R.: Different Aspects of Product Family Adoption. In: Proceedings of 5th International Workshop on Product Family Evolution, pp. 429–434 (2003)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Morisio, M., Ezran, M., Tully, C.: Success and Failure Factors in Software Reuse. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 28(4), 340–357 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Morisio, M., Seaman, C.B., Parra, A.T., Basili, V.R., Kraft, S.E., Condon, S.E.: Investigating and Improving a COTS-based Software Development. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 32–41 (2000)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Poulin, J.S.: Measuring Software Reuse: Principles, Practices, and Economic Models. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston (1996)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Pressman, R.S.: Software Engineering: a Practitioner’s Approach, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York (1986)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Senyard, A., Michlmayr, M.: How to Have a Successful Free Software Project. In: Proceedings of the 11th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference, Busan, Korea, pp. 84–91. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Stamelos, I., Angelis, L., Oikonomou, A., Bleris, G.L.: Code Quality Analysis in Open-Source Software Development. Information Systems Journal 12(1), 43–60 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Stevens, W.P., Myers, G.J., Constantine, L.L.: Structured Design. IBM Systems Journal 13, 115–139 (1974)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Torchiano, M., Morisio, M.: Overlooked Aspects of COTS-based Development. IEEE Software 21(2), 88–93 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Tu, Q., Godfrey, W.M.: The Build-Time Software Architecture View. In: Proceedings of 2001 International Conference on Software Maintenance, Florence, Italy, pp. 65–74. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2001)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Yu, L., Schach, S.R., Chen, K., Offutt, J.: Categorization of Common Coupling and Its Application to the Maintainability of the Linux Kernel. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 30(10), 43–60 (2004)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrea Capiluppi
    • 1
  • Cornelia Boldyreff
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre of Research on Open Source Software – CROSS Department of Computing and InformaticsUniversity of Lincoln 

Personalised recommendations