The Quaternary Volcanic Fields of the East and West Eifel (Germany)
The two Quaternary volcanic fields in the Eifel region of Germany (West Eifel Volcanic Field - WEVF; East Eifel Volcanic Field - EEVF) resemble each other in their temporal, spatial, structural and compositional evolution but also differ significantly in several parameters. Most volcanoes in both fields erupted foiditic potassic (K2O/Na2O >1) lavas with phenocrystic phlogopite and microlitic leucite being mineralogically most diagnostic as are the corresponding major and trace element characteristics. Volcanoes are dominantly scoria cones, of which about half erupted lava flows, and maars, their formation being partly governed by magma-water interaction. Phreatomagmatic eruptive activity reflecting variable degrees of magma/water mixing occurred during the growth of many scoria cones especially during the initial growth stage.
Volcanic activity in the WEVF started slowly less than 700 ka ago after the Rhenish shield had begun an accelerated phase of uplift with highly silica-undersaturated foiditic magmas near Ormont at the border with Belgium in the NW and peaked in the central part of the field between ca. 600 and 450 ka. Following a subsequent lull in activity, volcanism migrated to the SE, the frequency of volcano formation increasing during the past <100 ka, the youngest eruption having occurred at 11 ka. Most lavas are mafic with rare intermediate and local small highly evolved centers in the eastern central part of the field. Magma fractionation at high pressure, such as near the crust/mantle boundary, is reflected in common green-core clinopyroxene phenocrysts in many types of lavas - in both fields - and high temperature overprinting, partial melting and metasomatism of lower/middle crustal granulites. Very mafic and much less silica-undersaturated sodic olivine nephelinites and relatively LILE-poor sodic basanites with groundmass plagioclase, both being distinctly less isotopically enriched than the foidites, erupted in the southeastern WEVF during the past <50 ka side-by-side with foidites.
Distinct suites of ultramafic xenoliths, each with many variants, are recognized: (1) depleted and enriched peridotites (lherzolites, dunites, harzburgites and wehrlites) comprising several groups (highly deformed porphyroclastic xenoliths in the periphery and high-temperature recrystallized anhydrous types and metasomatized types near the center) and (2) cumulate- textured hornblendites, glimmerites and pyroxenites. The fact that clastic maar deposits are especially rich in peridotite and other ultramafic xenoliths is explained by xenolith-rich mafic volatile-rich magmas rising from greater depth coupled with high expulsion speeds during phreatomagmatic explosions. The near-absence of peridotite xenoliths and the abundance of clinopyroxene-, phlogopite- and amphibole-rich ultramafic cumulates containing remnants of peridotites in maar deposits in the southeastern part of the WEVF is probably due to more efficient filtering and dissolution of mantle peridotite fragments in subcrustal to lower crustal magma reservoirs in which the cumulates formed.
Volcanic activity in the EEVF started about 460 ka ago or slightly earlier. As in the WEVF, early activity in the western part of the EEVF is dominated by mafic foiditic lava compositions. A prominent phonolitic complex in its center (Rieden, ca. 430-360 ka) is represented by intrusions, domes, ignimbrites, and widespread fallout tephra. A younger eastern subfield beginning with the partly trachytic highly evolved phonolitic Wehr crater complex at about 215 ka ago was followed soon by the emplacement of potassic basanitic to tephritic scoria cones chiefly in the Neuwied tectonic basin. Volcanism extended east as far as Rhine River and south to close to the Moselle. Most EEVF basanite volcanoes formed ca. 215-190 ka ago. These lavas differ from the young sodic basanites in the WEVF by higher concentrations of Al, K, Ba, Rb and lower concentrations of Fe, Na, P, Sr, LREE, Zr/Nb ratios exceeding 3 for a given Mg#. The EEVF basanites are also less mafic and commonly evolved to early-erupted tephrite, volcanic edifices being generally larger than those in the WEVF. Volcanic activity was minor until 12,900 years BP when the phonolitic Laacher See Volcano (LSV) erupted >6 km3 magma, mostly during a few days, resulting in a Plinian fallout tephra layer recognized from southern Sweden to northern Italy. This is the most important very late Pleistocene stratigraphic marker bed in Central Europe. The partially evacuated strongly zoned reservoir was located ca. 5–8 km beneath the surface. The eruption, like many scoria cones in both fields, started phreatomagmatically. Rhine River was dammed during the eruption by massive tephra accumulation, forming a 20 m deep lake. The uncontrolled rupture of the tephra dam generated flood waves recognizable in deposits at least as far north as Bonn. The sulfur-rich LSV magma coupled with eruption columns at least 25 km high probably impacted climate significantly in the northern hemisphere.
The degree of melting based on CaO/Al2O3 ratios is lowest in the melilite nephelinites that abound in the WEVF but are rare in the EEVF (resembling EM 1) and highest for the basanites in both fields, possibly also reflected in their higher eruptive volume and more common differentiation to intermediate lavas. At least three compositionally distinct mantle domains can be distinguished from each other in the Eifel fields based on available radiogenic Sr-, Nd-, and Pb- ratios of mafic lavas and many incompatible element concentrations and ratios. The dominant foidites in both fields and especially the potassic EEVF basanites are the most radiogenic magmas compared to other Cenozoic volcanic fields in central Europe. These magmas may have been derived from the base of the metasomatized lithosphere. The spatial overlap of the highly alkalic Quaternary magmas, erupted during the early/main stages in both fields, with the southern part of the Eocene Hocheifel field suggests that the geologically young metasomatism that may have affected the base of the lithosphere could have largely resulted from Tertiary magmatic activity. The lack of indicators for metasomatism in the much more widespread Tertiary Eifel lavas is difficult to explain otherwise. The much less radiogenic young basanites and even less radiogenic olivine nephelinites of the WEVF fall close to the broad field of Tertiary lavas in central Europe and may have been derived from a similar possibly asthenospheric mantle source.
In the WEVF, a foiditic magma source was reactivated during the past ca. 100 ka or less. Simultaneously, magmas from a new compositional mantle domain supplied sodic basanites and olivine nephelinites to the surface during the past about 50 ka erupting in the southeastern part of the field side-by-side with foiditic lavas. The two compositionally distinct but spatially adjacent melting domains were probably stacked vertically. In the EEVF, the compositional mantle domain supplying foiditic magmas to the surface terminated between about 350 and 215 ka ago, after which time compositionally different less foiditic but more potassic and enriched basanites and minor tephrites erupted in the eastern subfield, locally evolving to voluminous phonolite. The youngest volcano in the Eifel, Ulmener Maar of extremely LILE-enriched intermediate composition, formed about 11,000 a BP, 2000 years after LSV erupted.
Mantle source regions beneath the fields are chemically distinct on different scales, larger domains differing in isotopic and smaller-scale domains in trace element ratios. Compositionally contrasting, but closely spaced, compositional domains in the mantle a few km across - representing heterogeneous compositions within, and/or differential rise of portions of, a mantle diapir - were activated successively with time or even released magma nearly simultaneously. A prominent example is the practically synchronous eruption of the ol-nephelinitic Mosenberg center followed immediately by the nearby melilite nephelinitic Meerfelder Maar, the largest in the Eifel. An example on a larger scale is the juxtaposition of the leucitite and plagioclase-free phonolitic Rieden and the adjacent Wehr- Laacher See basanite/plagioclase-bearing phonolite systems.
Volcano field analysis shows that magma mass eruption rates increased toward the center of both fields, coupled with an increasing degree of differentiation. The central parts of the fields show the highest erupted volumes and the highest flux of magmatic gases. These and other parameters are interpreted to mirror the central part of one or more magma collection zones in the upper mantle/Moho at least 30 (EEVF) to 50 km (WEVF) in length resulting in magma focusing in the center of both fields. Fields are dominantly oriented NW-SE, reflecting lithosphere cracking in response to the present lithospheric SW-NE-oriented tensional stress field north of the Alps which however was probably strongly enhanced by the similarly-oriented Paleozoic stress field. Cracks acting as magma pathways thus formed most easily perpendicular to the minimum compressional principal stress (σ 3) in a NW-SE direction with σ 1 (the maximum compressional principal stress) being vertical. Magma collection zones underlying both fields probably extended significantly laterally beyond the surface area of the volcanic fields because the most mafic magmas were erupted in the periphery of the fields. Magmas generated beyond the surface fields may have only risen as far as the crust/mantle transition zone in view of the abundant evidence for high-pressure fractionation at and below the crust/mantle boundary as well as surface degassing extending beyond the fields. Lithosphere cracking extended to the southeast during a lull in activity in the WEVF (between ca. 450-100 ka) as reflected in a migration of melt supply and surface volcanic activity. Migration of surface volcanism in the EEVF from W to ESE also occurred during a pause in surface volcanism between 350 and 215 ka and was associated with activation of a compositionally distinct melting domain. Both fields developed on either side, and in the hinge zones, of the area of maximum Quaternary uplift, magmas in the WEVF and western EEVF rising in uplifted parts of the Rhenish Massif while the eastern EEVF lavas erupted in the downfaulted Neuwied basin, part of the Rhine Rift structure.
Major Paleozoic structural discontinuities in both fields such as the Eifel N-S graben zone in the western and the Siegen thrust in the eastern field, and Tertiary faults in the Neuwied Basin, appear to have caused deviations in dike orientations and regionally significant boundaries in magma composition and xenolith suites. This suggests that some upper crustal fractures (zones of weakness) extend significantly downward into the lithosphere.
The total mass of magma supplied to the base of the crust and crustal reservoirs (estimated to have been between 300 and 500 km3) — and possibly rates of magma risen from the melting anomalies — was probably higher in the EEVF than in the WEVF. This is indicated by the volume of parent magmas that have to be postulated to generate the relatively voluminous highly evolved phonolite centers and possibly also by the much higher CO2-flux in the EEVF provided present flux rates are representative. Magma supply to the crust — and possibly magma production — was strongly focused beneath several centers in the EEVF contrasting with more diffuse magma-leaking in the WEVF, a more typical intraplate volcanic field. It is uncertain, however, whether magma focusing in the EEVF was entirely due to higher magma supply from the mantle — possibly resulting from higher degrees of partial melting — or to lower rates of lithosphere extension allowing for higher crack and dike coalescence (Takada 1994) and thus magma focusing. Volcanic activity in the Eifel is presently dormant but not extinct judging from the past temporal pattern of eruptions. Future volcanoes are likely to grow in the southeastern part of both Eifel fields.
The absence of a shear-wave anomaly between 170 and 240 km in the seismic low velocity anomaly in the mantle (Eifel Plume) may be due to separation of an upper diapir (“blob”) providing thermal energy and melt to the basal lithosphere. The upper part (30–140 km) of the seismic low velocity anomaly in the mantle has a diameter of more than 100 km and thus extends significantly beyond both volcanic fields. This upper part may correspond to the magma migration or collection zone culminating between about 37 and 30 km below the surface where the crust-mantle boundary is not sharply defined and may be the site of voluminous magma underplating. The shapes, sizes, directions and volcano concentrations of both fields do not mirror the subcircular shape of the anomaly. Provided the present mantle anomaly (plume) represents the deep mantle roots to the Quaternary volcanism, two smaller dimensions of spatially and compositionally distinct ascending “magma supply fingers” are evident. The smaller ones are a few km across and have life times on the order of several 100 ka. Two or more of these make up a volcanic field, a deep plume source (mantle diapir) spawning one or more surface field.
KeywordsVolcanic Field Contrib Mineral Petrol Magma Reservoir Scoria Cone Peridotite Xenolith
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Ahorner L (1983) Historical seismicity and present-day micro-earthquake activity of the Rhenish Massif, Central Europe. In: Fuchs K et al. (eds) Plateau Uplift. Springer Heidelberg, pp 198–221Google Scholar
- Baumann H, Illies JH (1983) Stress field and strain release in the Rhenish Massif. In: Fuchs K et al. (eds) Plateau Uplift. Springer Heidelberg, pp 177–186Google Scholar
- Bednarz U, Freundt A, Schmincke H-U (1983) Die Eignung von Lokationen in der E-und W-Eifel für ein deutsches HOT-DRY-ROCK Geothermik Projekt. BMFT Berichte, pp 1–100Google Scholar
- Bogaard Pvd, Schmincke H-U (1990) Die Entwicklungsgeschichte des Mittelrheinraumes und die Eruptionsgeschichte des Osteifel-Vulkanfeldes. In: Schirmer W (ed) Rheingeschichte zwischen Mosel und Maas. DEUQUA-Führer 1, Düsseldorf, pp 1–30Google Scholar
- Böhnel H, Reismann N, Jäger G, Haverkamp U, Negendank JFW, Schmincke HU (1987) Paleomagnetic investigation of Quaternary West Eifel volcanics (Germany): evidence for increased volcanic activity during geomagnetic excursion/event. J Geophys 62:50–61Google Scholar
- Bosinski G (1981) Eiszeitjäger im Neuwieder Becken. Archäologie am Mittelrhein und Mosel 1:1–112Google Scholar
- Bräuer K, Kämpf H, Niedermanmn S, Strauch G (2005) Evidence for ascending upper mantle-derived melt beneath the Cheb basin, central Europe. Geophys Res Lett 32, LO8303, doi:10.1029/2004GL022205. 4 pGoogle Scholar
- Büchel G, Mertes H (1982) Die Eruptionszentren des Westeifeler Vulkanfeldes. Z Dt Geol Ges 133:409–429Google Scholar
- Büchel G, Lorenz V (1982) Zum Alter des Maarvulkanismus der Westeifel. N. Jb Geol Paläont Abh 163:1–22Google Scholar
- Cantarel P, Lippolt HJ (1977) Alter und Abfolge des Vulkanismus der Hocheifel. N Jb Geol Pal Mh 1977:600–612Google Scholar
- Cebria JM, Wilson M (1995) Cenozoic mafic magmatism in central Europe: a common European asthenospheric reservoir? Terra Abstracts 7:162Google Scholar
- Connor CB (1990) Cinder cone clustering in the Transmexican Volcanic Belt: implications for structural and petrologic models. J Geophys Res 95:19395–19405Google Scholar
- Connor CB, Conway FM (2000) Basaltic volcanic fields. In: Sigurdsson et al. (eds) Encyclopedia of Volcanology. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 331–344Google Scholar
- Duda A, Schmincke H-U (1978) Petrology of Quaternary basanites, nephelinites and tephrites from the Laacher See area (Eifel). N Jb Miner Abh 132:1–33Google Scholar
- Fekiacova Z, Mertz D, Hofmann AW (b) Geodynamic setting of the Tertiary Hocheifel volcanism (Germany), Part II: Geochemistry and Sr, Nd and Pb isotopic compositions. This volumeGoogle Scholar
- Fekiacova Z, Mertz DF, Renne PR (a) Geodynamic setting of the Tertiary Hocheifel volcanism (Germany), Part I: 40Ar/39Ar geochronology. This volumeGoogle Scholar
- Freundt B (1986): Der leuzititische Hochsimmer Vulkan (Osteifel): vulkanologische, petrologische und geochemische Entwicklung und die Säulenbildung im Lavastrom. Diplomarbeit Ruhr-Universität Bochum, pp 1–251Google Scholar
- Fuchs K, von Gehlen K, Mälzer H, Murawski H, Semmel A (eds) (1983) Plateau uplift, the Rhenish Shield-a case history. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 1–411Google Scholar
- Fuhrmann U, Lippolt HJ (1987) Excess argon and dating of Quaternary Eifel volcanism: III. Alkalibasaltic rocks of the Central West Eifel/FR Germany. N Jb Geol Pal Mh:213–236Google Scholar
- Grapes RH (1986) Melting and thermal reconstitution of pelitic xenoliths, Wehr volcano, East Eifel, West Germany. J Petrol 27:343–396Google Scholar
- Huckenholz HG (1983) Tertiary volcanism of the Hocheifel area. In: Fuchs K et al (eds) Plateau Uplift-The Rhenish Shield-A Case History. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 121–128Google Scholar
- Huckenholz HG, Büchel G (1988) Tertiärer Vulkanismus der Hocheifel. Fortschr Min 66, Beiheft 2:43–82Google Scholar
- Jung S, Hoernes S (2000) The major and trace element and isotope (Sr, Nd, O) geochemistry of Cenozoic mafic volcanic rocks from the Rhön area (central Germany); constraints on the origin of continental alkaline and tholeiitic basalts and their mantle source. J Petrol 86:151–177Google Scholar
- Keller J, Brey G, Lorenz V, Sachs P (1990) IAVCEI 1990 pre-conference excursion 2A: Volcanism and petrology of the Upper Rhinegraben (Urach-Hegau-Kaiserstuhl). IAVCEI Internat Volcanol Congress Mainz 1990, pp 1–60Google Scholar
- Klügel A, Hansteen TH, Schmincke H-U (1997) Rates of magma ascent and depths of magma reservoirs beneath La Palma (Canary Islands). Terra Nova 9:117–121Google Scholar
- Langguth HR, Plum H (1984) Untersuchung der Mineral-und Thermalquellen der Eifel auf geothermische Indikationen. Forschungsber BMFT. T84-019: 1–196Google Scholar
- Lippolt HJ (1983) Distribution of volcanic activity in space and time. In: Fuchs K et al (eds) Plateau Uplift-The Rhenish Shield-A Case History. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 112–120Google Scholar
- Lloyd FE (1987) Characterization of mantle metasomatic fluids in spinel lherzolite and alkali clinopyroxenites from the West Eifel and Uganda. In: Menzies MA, Hawkesworth CJ (eds) Mantle Metasomatism. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 91–123Google Scholar
- Lloyd FE, Bailey DK (1975) Light element metasomatism of the continental mantle: the evidence and the consequences. In: Ahrens LH, Dawson JB, Cunkan AR, Erlank AJ (eds) Physics Chemistry Earth 9. Pergamon, Oxford, pp 389–416Google Scholar
- Lorenz V (1985) Maars and diatremes of phreatomagmatic origin, a review. Trans Geol Soc South Africa 88:459–470Google Scholar
- Lorenz V, Büchel G (1980) Zur Vulkanologie der Maare und Schlackenkegel der Westeifel. Mitt Pollichia 68:29–100Google Scholar
- Luhr JF, Simkin T (eds) (1993) Paricutin, the volcano born in a Mexican cornfield. Geoscience Press, Phoenix, pp 1–427Google Scholar
- Mälzer H, Hein G, Zippelt K (1983) Height changes in the Rhenish Massif: determination and analysis. In: Fuchs K et al (eds) Plateau Uplift-The Rhenish Shield-A Case History. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 164–176Google Scholar
- May F (2001) CO2-flux in a dormant intraplate volcanic field: the Westeifel, Germany. Water-rock interaction, Cidu (ed.) Swets and Zeitlinger. pp 883–886Google Scholar
- Mechie J, Prodehl C, Fuchs K (1983) The long-range seismic refraction experiment in the Rhenish Massif. In: Fuchs K et al (eds) Plateau Uplift-The Rhenish Shield-A Case History. Springer Heidelberg, pp 260–275Google Scholar
- Mertes H (1983) Aufbau und Genese des Westeifeler Vulkanfeldes. Bochumer geol geotechn Arb 9, pp 1–415Google Scholar
- Mertes H, Schmincke H-U (1983) Age distribution of volcanoes in the West-Eifel. N Jb Geol Paläont Abh 166:260–283Google Scholar
- Meyer W (1986) Geologie der Eifel. Schweizerbart’sche Verlagsbuchhdlg (Stuttgart), pp 1–615Google Scholar
- Meyer W, Stets J (1981) Die Siegener Hauptaufschiebung im Laacher-See-Gebiet (Rheinisches Schiefergebirge). Z Dt Geol Ges 132:43–53Google Scholar
- Meyer W, Stets J (1998) Junge Tektonik im Rheinischen Schiefergebirge und ihre Quantifizierung. Z Dt Geol Ges 149:359–379Google Scholar
- Meyer W, Stets J. Quaternary uplift in the Eifel area. This volumeGoogle Scholar
- Prodehl C, Müller St, Glahn A, Gutscher M, Haak V (1992) Lithospheric cross-section of the European Cenozoic rift system. In: Ziegler PA (ed), Geodynamics of rifting, Vol I. Case history studies on rifts: Europe and Asia. Tectonophysics 208, pp 113–138Google Scholar
- Prodehl C, Müller St, Haak V (1995) The European Cenozoic rift system. In: Olsen KH (ed) Continental rifts: Evolution, structure, tectonics. Elsevier (Amsterdam), pp 133–212Google Scholar
- Raikes SA (1980) Teleseismic evidence for velocity heterogeneity beneath the Rhenish Massif. J Geophys 48:80–83Google Scholar
- Raikes SA, Bonjer K-P (1983) Large-scale mantle heterogeneity beneath the Rhenish Massif and its vicinity from teleseismic p-residuals measurements. In: Fuchs K et al (eds) Plateau Uplift-The Rhenish Shield-A Case History. Springer (Heidelberg), pp 315–331Google Scholar
- Ritter JRR (2005) Small-scale mantle plumes: Imaging and geodynamic aspects. In: F Wenzel (ed) Perspectives in Modern Seismology. Lecture Notes Earth Sci, Springer, pp 69–94Google Scholar
- Ritter JRR. The seismic signature of the Eifel plume. This volumeGoogle Scholar
- Ritter JRR, Jordan M, Christensen UR, Achauer U (2001) A mantle plume below the Eifel volcanic fields, Germany. Earth Planet Sci Lett 98:192–207Google Scholar
- Schmincke H-U (1977a) Eifel-Vulkanismus östlich des Gebietes Rieden-Mayen. Fortschr Miner 55, Beiheft 2:1–31Google Scholar
- Schmincke H-U (1977b) Phreatomagmatische Phasen in quartären Vulkanen der Osteifel. Geol Jahrb 39:3–45Google Scholar
- Schmincke H-U (1982) Vulkane und ihre Wurzeln. Rhein-Westf Akad Wissensch, Westd Verl (Opladen), Vorträge N 315:35–78Google Scholar
- Schmincke H-U (2000) Vulkanismus. Wiss Buchges Darmstadt, 2nd ed, pp 1–264Google Scholar
- Schmincke H-U (2004) Volcanism. Springer Heidelberg. pp 1–324Google Scholar
- Schmincke H-U (2006) The Quaternary Eifel volcanic fields. Görres Verlag Koblenz, pp 1–125Google Scholar
- Schmincke H-U, Bogaard Pvd, Freundt A (1990). Quaternary Eifel Volcanism. Excursion guide, workshop in explosive volcanism. IAVCEI Internat Volcanol Congr Mainz (Germany). Pluto Press Witten pp 1–188Google Scholar
- Schmincke H-U, Lorenz V, Seck HA (1983) The Quaternary Eifel volcanic fields. In: Fuchs K et al (eds) Plateau Uplift-The Rhenish Shield-A Case History. Springer (Heidelberg), pp 139–151Google Scholar
- Schulz B (1992) Mineralogie und Geochemie des Niedermendiger Lavastroms. Diplomarbeit Ruhr Univ Bochum: pp 1–143Google Scholar
- Schumacher ME (2002) Upper Rhine Graben: the role of pre-existing structures during rift evolution. Tectonics 21: doi: 10.1029/2001TC900022. 17 ppGoogle Scholar
- Seck HA, Wedepohl KH (1983) Mantle xenoliths in the Rhenish Massif and the Northern Hessian Depression. In: Fuchs K et al (eds) Plateau Uplift-The Rhenish Shield-A Case History. Springer (Heidelberg), pp 343–351Google Scholar
- Simkin T, Siebert L (1994) Volcanoes of the World. 2nd ed. Geoscience Press, Missoula, pp 1–368Google Scholar
- Sleep NH (2002) Local lithospheric relief associated with fracture zones and ponded plume material. G33: 8506, doi:10.1029/2002GC000376Google Scholar
- Sobczak G (1986) Vulkanologische und geochemische Entwicklung der spätquartären Bellerberg Vulkangruppe. Diplomarbeit (MA thesis) Ruhr Universität Bochum, pp 1–215Google Scholar
- Stosch HG (1987) Constitution and evolution of subcontinental upper mantle and lower crust in areas of young volcanism: differences and similarities between the Eifel (FR Germany) and Tariat Depression (central Mongolia) as evidenced by peridotite and granulite xenoliths. Fortschr Mineral 65:49–86Google Scholar
- Trieloff M, Altherr R. He-Ne-Ar isotope systematics in Eifel and Pannonian basin mantle xenoliths trace deep mantle plume-lithosphere interaction beneath the European continent. This volumeGoogle Scholar
- Viereck L (1984) Geologische und petrologische Entwicklung des pleistozänen Vulkankomplexes Rieden, Ost-Eifel. Bochumer geol geotechn Arb 17:1–337Google Scholar
- Wilson M, Downes H (1991) Tertiary-Quaternary extension-related alkaline magmatism in western and central Europe. J Petrol 32:811–849Google Scholar
- Wilson M, Downes H (2006) Tertiary-Quaternary intra-plate magmatism in Europe and its relationship to mantle dynamics. In: Stephenson R, Gee D (eds) European Lithosphere Dynamics. Geol Soc London Mem (in press)Google Scholar
- Wilson M, Patterson R (2002) Intraplate magmatism related to short-wavelength convective instabilities in the upper mantle: evidence from the Tertiary-Quaternary volcanic province of western and central Europe. Geol Soc Am Spec Paper 352:37–58Google Scholar
- Witt-Eickschen G. Thermal and geochemical evolution of the shallow subcontinental lithospheric mantle beneath the Eifel: Constraints from mantle xenoliths: a review. This volumeGoogle Scholar
- Wörner G (1998) Quaternary Eifel volcanism, its mantle sources and effect on the crust of the Rhenish Shield. In: Neugebauer HJ (ed) Young tectonics — magmatism — fluids: a case study of the Rhenish Massif, University of Bonn, SFB 35074:11–16Google Scholar
- Wörner G, Schmincke H-U (1984a) Mineralogical and chemical zonation of the Laacher See tephra sequence. J Petrol 25:805–835Google Scholar
- Wörner G, Schmincke H-U (1984b) Petrogenesis of the Laacher See tephra sequence (East Eifel, Germany). J Petrol 25:836–851Google Scholar
- Wörner G, Viereck LG, Plaumann S, Pucher R, Bogaard Pvd, Schmincke H-U (1988) The Quaternary Wehr Volcano: A multiphase evolved eruption center in the East Eifel Volcanic field (FRG). N Jb Miner Abh 159:73–99Google Scholar
- Wörner G, Schmincke H-U, Schreyer W (1982) Crustal xenoliths from the Quaternary Wehr volcano (East Eifel). N Jb Miner Abh 144:29–55Google Scholar
- Ziegler PA (1992) European Cenozoic rift system. In: Ziegler PA (ed) Geodynamics of Rifting Volume I. Case History on rifts: Europe and Asia. Tectonophysics 208, pp 91–111Google Scholar