Advertisement

Phoenix, Arizona, USA: Applications of Remote Sensing in a Rapidly Urbanizing Desert Region

  • William L. Stefanov
  • Maik Netzband
  • Matthias S. Möller
  • Charles L. Redman
  • Chris Mack

Abstract

The Phoenix metropolitan agglomeration (Fig. 7.1) is one of the fastest-growing conurbations in the United States, and is the focus of the Central Arizona-Phoenix Long-Term Ecological Research Project (CAP LTER) (Grimm et al. 2000, Grimm and Redman 2004). This project has been the locus of significant remote sensing investigation and characterization of the Phoenix urban and peri-urban areas (Stefanov 2002), combined with ground truthing and allied studies (Hope et al. 2003). The information derived from these and other studies is increasingly being used by local governments and regional planners (GP2100 2003). As an example, the City of Scottsdale, Arizona has used high-resolution, airborne, multispectral data to assess impervious and pervious land-cover percentages for surface water runoff studies. This use of remotely sensed information, rather than traditional ground-based surveys, produced estimated cost savings of eight to fifteen million dollars for the city (W. Erickson 1999). Construction of an advanced visualization and modeling environment (a “decision theater”) that integrates remotely sensed and other geospatial data for the Phoenix metropolitan region was completed in 2005 at Arizona State University (J. Fink 2005). Use of such an advanced system enables near real-time modeling of the impact of planning and development decisions. Remotely sensed data acquired at a variety of spatial, spectral, and temporal resolutions provides the basic biophysical information necessary to initialize models of urban resilience and sustainability.

Keywords

Remote Sensing Urban Heat Island Urban Fringe LULC Change Change Detection Analysis 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abrams M (2000) The Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer (ASTER): Data products for the high spatial resolution imager on NASA’s Terra platform. International Journal of Remote Sensing 21:847–859CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arrowsmith JR, Stefanov WL (2003) Geology overview for the CAP-LTER region. Central Arizona-Phoenix Long Term Ecological Research Project virtual tour, http://caplter.asu.edu/home/capltertour/geology.htm (accessed 6-March-2007)
  3. Baatz M, Schaepe A (2000) Multiresolution segmentation: An optimization approach for high quality multi-scale image segmentation. In: Strobl J, Blaschke T, Griesebner G (eds) Angewandte geographische informationsverarbeitung, XII. Wichmann, Karlsruhe, Germany, pp 12–23Google Scholar
  4. Benz UC, Hoffmann P, Willhauk G, Lingenfelder I, Heynen M (2004) Multi-resolution, object-oriented fuzzy analysis of remote sensing data for GIS-ready information. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 58:239–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berling-Wolff S, Wu J (2004) Urban growth models: A historical review. Ecological Research 19:119–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blemenfeld H (1954) The tidal wave of metropolitan expansion. Journal of the American Institute of Planners 10:3–14Google Scholar
  7. Brazel AJ, Selover N, Vose R, Heisler G (2000) The tale of two climates: Baltimore and Phoenix LTER sites. Climate Research 15:123–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Congalton RG, Green K (1999) Assessing the accuracy of remotely sensed data: principles and practices. Lewis Publishers, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  9. Christensen PR, Bandfield JL, Hamilton VE, Howard DA, Lane MD, Piatek JL, Ruff SW, Stefanov WL (2000) A thermal emission spectral library of rock-forming minerals. Journal of Geophysical Research 105:9735–9739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dell’Acqua F, Gamba P, Lisini G (2003) Improvements to urban area characterization using multitemporal and multiangle SAR images. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 41:1996–2004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Donnay J-P, Barnsley MJ, Longley PA (2001) Remote sensing and urban analysis. In: Longley PA, Donnay J-P, Barnsley MJ (eds) Remote sensing and urban analysis. Taylor and Francis, London, UK, pp 3–18Google Scholar
  12. Erickson W (1999) Division of Stormwater Management, Municipal Services Department, City of Scottsdale, Arizona (personal communication)Google Scholar
  13. Fagan WF, Meir E, Carroll S, Wu J (2001) The ecology of urban landscapes: Modeling housing starts as a density-dependent colonization process. Landscape Ecology 16(1): 33–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fink J (2005) Vice President for Research and Economic Affairs, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona (personal communication)Google Scholar
  15. Fujii K, Arikawa T (2002) Urban object reconstruction using airborne laser elevation image and aerial image. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 40:2234–2240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gammage G Jr (1999) Phoenix in perspective: Reflection on developing the desert. Arizona State University, Tempe, AZGoogle Scholar
  17. GEOSYSTEMS GmbH (1997) ATCOR2 for ERDAS Imagine user manual. GEOSYSTEMS GmbH, Germering GermanyGoogle Scholar
  18. Gober P (2000) In search of synthesis. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 90:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gober P, Burns EK (2002) The size and shape of Phoenix’s urban fringe. Journal of Planning Education and Research 21:379–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gong P, Howarth PJ (1990) The use of structural information for improving land — cover classification accuracies at the rural — urban fringe. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 56:67–73Google Scholar
  21. GP2100 (2003) Greater Phoenix regional atlas: A preview of the region’s 50-year future. Arizona State University, Tempe, AZGoogle Scholar
  22. Grimm NB, Grove JM, Redman CL, Pickett STA (2000) Integrated approaches to long-term studies of urban ecological systems. BioScience 70:571–584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Grimm NB, Redman CL (2004) Approaches to the study of urban ecosystems: The case of Central Arizona-Phoenix. Urban Ecosystems 7:199–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Grossman-Clarke S, Zehnder JA, Stefanov WL, Liu Y, Zoldak MA (2005) Urban modifications in a mesoscale meteorological model and the effects on near surface variables in an arid metropolitan region. Journal of Applied Meteorology 44:1281–1297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Harlan SL, Brazel AJ, Prashad L, Stefanov WL, Larsen L (2006) Neighborhood microclimates and vulnerability to heat stress. Social Science & Medicine 63:2847–2863CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hawkins TW, Brazel AJ, Stefanov WL, Bigler W, Safell EM (2004) The role of rural variability in urban heat island determination for Phoenix, Arizona. Journal of Applied Meteorology 43:476–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Herold M, Gardner ME, Roberts DA (2003) Spectral resolution requirements for mapping urban areas. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 41:1907–1919CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hope D, Gries C, Zhu W, Fagan WF, Redman CL, Grimm NB, Nelson AL, Martin C, Kinzig A (2003) Socioeconomics drive urban plant diversity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 1000(15):8788–8792CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Huete AR (1988) A soil-adjusted vegetation index (SAVI). Remote Sensing of Environment 25:295–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Irons JR, Petersen GW (1981) Texture transforms of remote sensing data. Remote Sensing of Environment 11:359–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jenerette GD, Harlan SL, Brazel A, Jones N, Larsen L, Stefanov WL (2007) Regional relationships between surface temperature, vegetation, and human settlement in a rapidly urbanizing ecosystem. Landscape Ecology 22:353–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jenerette GD, Wu J (2001) Analysis and simulation of land use change in the central Arizona — Phoenix region. Landscape Ecology 16:611–626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jensen JR (1996) Introductory image processing: A remote sensing perspective (2nd ed). Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJGoogle Scholar
  34. Jensen JR (2000) Remote sensing of the environment: An Earth resource perspective. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJGoogle Scholar
  35. Kahle AB, Palluconi FD, Christensen PR (1993) Thermal emission spectroscopy: Application to the Earth and Mars. In: Pieters CM, Englert PAJ (eds) Remote geochemical analysis: Elemental and mineralogical composition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 99–120Google Scholar
  36. Knowles-Yánez K, Moritz C, Bucchin M, Redman C, Fry J, McCartney P, Marruffo J (1999) Historic land use team: Generalized land use for CAP LTER study area. Central Arizona-Phoenix Long-Term Ecological Research (CAP LTER) First Annual Poster Symposium, Tempe, AZ, p 22Google Scholar
  37. Kupel DE (2003) Fuel for growth: Water and Arizona’s urban environment. University of Arizona Press, Tucson, AZGoogle Scholar
  38. MacMahon JA (1988) Warm deserts. In: Barbour MG, Billings WD (eds) North american terrestrial vegetation. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, pp 231–264Google Scholar
  39. Mesev V (2003) Remotely sensed cities: An introduction. In: Mesev V (ed) Remotely sensed cities. Taylor and Francis, New York, NY, pp 1–19Google Scholar
  40. Moeller M[S] (2004) Monitoring long term transition processes of a metropolitan area with remote sensing. Proceeding of the IGARRS 2004 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, Anchorage, AK, pp 3398–3401Google Scholar
  41. Moeller MS (2005) Remote sensing for the monitoring of urban growth patterns. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing, and Spatial Information Sciences 36 (on CDROM)Google Scholar
  42. PAG (2004) Pima Association of Governments, 177 North Church Avenue, Suite #405, Tucson, AZ 85701, http://www.pagnet.org/default.htm, accessed 6-March-2007
  43. Quay R (2004) Bridging the gap between ecological research and land use policy: The North Sonoran Collaboration. Urban Ecosystems 7:283–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Redman CL (1999) Human impacts on the ancient environment. University of Arizona Press, Tucson, AZGoogle Scholar
  45. Reynolds J, Wu J (1999) Do landscape structural and functional units exist? In: Tenhunen JD, Kabat P (eds) Integrating hydrology, ecosystem dynamics, and biogeochemistry in complex landscapes. John Wiley, New York, NY, pp 273–296Google Scholar
  46. Roessner S, Segl K, Heiden U, Kaufmann H (2001) Automated differentiation of urban surfaces based on airborne hyperspectral imagery. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 39:1525–1532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sabins FF (1997) Remote sensing: principles and interpretation (3rd ed). W. H. Freeman, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  48. Salisbury JW, Walter LS, Vergo N, D’Aria DM (1991) Infrared (2.1–25 micrometers) spectra of minerals. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MDGoogle Scholar
  49. Stefanov WL (2000) 1985, 1990, 1993, 1998 Land cover maps of the Phoenix, Arizona metropolitan area. Geological Remote Sensing Laboratory, Department of Geological Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe. 4 Plates, scale 1:115,200Google Scholar
  50. Stefanov WL (2002) Remote sensing of urban ecology at the Central Arizona-Phoenix Long Term Ecological Research site. Arid Lands Newsletter 51, http://ag.arizona.edu/OALS/ALN/aln51/stefanov.html, accessed 6-March-2007
  51. Stefanov WL, Netzband M (2005) Assessment of ASTER land cover and MODIS NDVI data at multiple scales for ecological characterization of an arid urban center. Remote Sensing of Environment 99(1–2):31–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Stefanov WL, Netzband M (2007) Characterization and monitoring of urban/periurban ecological function and landscape structure using satellite data. In: Rashed T, Jürgens C (eds) Remote Sensing of urban and suburban areas. Springer, New York, NY (in press)Google Scholar
  53. Stefanov WL, Ramsey MS, Christensen PR (2001) Monitoring urban land cover change: An expert system approach to land cover classification of semiarid to arid urban centers. Remote Sensing of Environment 77:173–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Stefanov WL, Ramsey MS, Christensen PR (2003) Identification of fugitive dust generation, deposition, and transport areas using remote sensing. Environmental and Engineering Geoscience 9:151–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Stefanov WL, Prashad L, Eisinger C, Brazel A[J], Harlan S (2004) Investigations of human modification of landscape and climate in the Phoenix Arizona metropolitan area using MASTER data. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing, and Spatial Information Sciences 35:1339–1347Google Scholar
  56. Stuckens J, Coppin PR, Bauer ME (2000) Integrating contextual information with per-pixel classification for improved land cover classification. Remote Sensing of Environment 71:282–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Vogelmann JE, Sohl T, Howard SM (1998) Regional characterization of land cover using multiple sources of data. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 64:45–57Google Scholar
  58. Voogt JA, Oke TR (2003) Thermal remote sensing of urban climates. Remote Sensing of Environment 86:370–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wentz EA, Stefanov WL, Gries C, Hope D (2006) Land use and land cover mapping from diverse data sources for an arid urban environments. Computers, Environment, and Urban Systems 30(3):320–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Woodcock CE, Strahler AH (1987) The factor of scale in remote sensing. Remote Sensing of Environment 21:311–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Wu J (1999) Hierarchy and scaling: Extrapolating information along a scaling ladder. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing 25(4): 367–380Google Scholar
  62. Wu J (2004) Effects of changing scale on landscape pattern analysis: Scaling relations. Landscape Ecology 19:125–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Wu J, David JL (2002) A spatially explicit hierarchical approach to modeling complex ecological systems: Theory and applications. Ecological Modeling 153:7–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Wu J, Jelinski DE, Luck M, Tueller PT (2000) Multiscale analysis of landscape heterogeneity: Scale variance and pattern metrics. Geographic Information Sciences 6(1):6–19Google Scholar
  65. Wu J, Shen W, Sun W, Tueller PT (2002) Empirical patterns of the effects of changing scale on landscape metrics. Landscape Ecology 17:761–782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Zehnder JA (2002) Simple modifications to improve fifth-generation Pennsylvania State University-National Center for Atmospheric Research mesoscale model performance for the Phoenix, Arizona metropolitan area. Journal of Applied Meteorology 41:971–979CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • William L. Stefanov
    • 1
  • Maik Netzband
    • 2
  • Matthias S. Möller
    • 3
  • Charles L. Redman
    • 3
  • Chris Mack
    • 4
  1. 1.Image Science & Analysis LaboratoryNASA Johnson Space CenterHoustonUSA
  2. 2.F & U ConsultUFZ-Helmholtz Centre for Environmental ResearchLeipzigGermany
  3. 3.Global Institute of SustainabilityArizona State UniversityTempeUSA
  4. 4.GIS DepartmentTown of Marana, MaranaUSA

Personalised recommendations