Advertisement

Dynamic Planet pp 473-479 | Cite as

Understanding Time-variable Gravity due to Core Dynamical Processes with Numerical Geodynamo Modeling

  • W. Jiang
  • W. Kuang
  • B. Chao
  • M. Fang
  • C. Cox
Chapter
Part of the International Association of Geodesy Symposia book series (IAG SYMPOSIA, volume 130)

Abstract

On decadal time scales, there are three major physical processes in the Earth’s outer core that contribute to gravity variations: (i) the mass redistribution due to advection in the outer core, (ii) the mantle deformation in response to (i), and (iii) the (core) pressure loading on the core-mantle boundary. Except the last one, they cannot be evaluated from surface observations. In this paper we use MoSST core dynamics model and PREM model to understand the gravity anomalies from the three processes. Our numerical results show that, the gravity anomalies are comparable in magnitude, though that from the process (i) is in general the strongest. The gravity anomalies from the first two processes tend to offset each other (“mantle shielding”). Consequently the pressure loading effect contributes more to axisymmetric part of the net gravity variation, while the net effect from the first two processes is more important to non axisymmetric components.

Keywords

Gravity anomalies core convection numerical model 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. AGU, Contributions of Space Geodesy to Geodynamics: Technology (eds. D. E. Smith and D. L. Turcotte), Geodynamics Series 25, AGU, Washington, D.C., 1993Google Scholar
  2. Braginsky, S. I. (1967), Magnetic waves in the Earth’s core, Geomagnetism and Aeronomy, 7, pp. 851–859.Google Scholar
  3. Chao, B. F., V. Dehant, R. S. Gross, R. D. Ray, D. A. Salstein, M. M. Watkins, and C. R. Wilson (2000), Space geodesy monitors mass transports in global geophysical fluids, EOS, Trans. Amer. Geophys. Union, 81, pp. 247–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chao, B. F. (2005), On inversion for mass distribution from global (time-variable) gravity field, Journal of Geodynamics, 39, pp. 223–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cox, C. M., and B. F. Chao (2002), Detection of a large-scale mass redistribution in the terrestrial system since 1998, Science, 297, pp. 831–833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dumburry, M. and J. Bloxham (2004), Variation in the Earth’s gravitational field caused by torsional oscillations in the core. Geophysical Journal International, 159, pp. 417–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fang, M., B. H. Hager and T. A. Herring (1996), Surface deformation caused by pressure changes in the fluid core. Geophysical Research Letters, 23, p.p. 1493–1496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fang, M., B. H. Hager, W. Kuang and B. F. Chao (2005), On the Core Tides, submitted to Journal of Geophysical Research.Google Scholar
  9. Greff, M., Pais and J.-L. LeMouël (2004), Surface gravitational field and topography changes induced by the Earth’s fluid core motions, Journal of Geodesy, 78, pp. 386–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Heiskanen W. A. and H. Moritz, 1968. Physical Geodesy, Freeman & Company.Google Scholar
  11. Jault, D., C. Gire and J.-L. LeMou 1 (1988), Westward drift, core motions and exchanges of angular momentum between core and mantle, Nature, 333, pp. 353–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kuang, W. (1999), Force balances and convective state in the Earth’s core, Physics of Earth and Planetary Interiors, 116, pp. 65–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kuang, W. and J. Bloxham (1999), Numerical Modeling of Magnetohydrodynamic Convection in a Rapid Rotating Spherical Shell: Weak and Strong Field Dynamo Action. Journal of Computational Physics 153, pp. 51–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kuang, W. and B. F. Chao (2003), Geodynamo modeling and core-mantle interaction. In: The core-mantle boundary region (eds. Dehandt, Creager, Karato and Zatman) Geodynamics Series, 31, AGU, pp. 193–212.Google Scholar
  15. Kuang, W., B. F. Chao, C. Cox and M. Fang (2004), Time-variable Gravity Signal From Core Mass Flow Based on Geodynamo Simulation, submitted to Geophysical Journal International.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. Jiang
    • 1
  • W. Kuang
    • 2
  • B. Chao
    • 2
  • M. Fang
    • 3
  • C. Cox
    • 4
  1. 1.Joint Center for Earth Systems TechnologyUniversity of Maryland at Baltimore CountyBaltimoreUSA
  2. 2.Space Geodesy LaboratoryNASA Goddard Space Flight CenterGreenbelt
  3. 3.Dept. Earth and Space SciencesMassachusetts Institute of TechnologyCambridge
  4. 4.Raytheon at Space Geodesy LaboratoryNASA Goddard Space Flight CenterUSA

Personalised recommendations