Advertisement

Dynamic Planet pp 467-472 | Cite as

Tilt Observations Around the KTB-Site / Germany: Monitoring and Modelling of Fluid Induced Deformation of the Upper Crust of the Earth

  • T. Jahr
  • G. Jentzsch
  • H. Letz
  • A. Gebauer
Part of the International Association of Geodesy Symposia book series (IAG SYMPOSIA, volume 130)

Abstract

At the German Continental Deep Drilling site (KTB) the pilot borehole of a depth of 4000 m was used to inject water with a medium rate of 180 litres/minute over a period of one year. To monitor the expected surface deformation five borehole tiltmeters of the ASKANIA type Gbp10 were installed in the surrounding area of the KTB location in mid 2003. The deformation was detected at kilometre scale, together with the observations of induced seismicity in the area. We observed elastic as well as inelastic responses: changes of the rheologic properties due to pore pressure increase caused changes in the tidal parameters. First we quantified the expected additional drift for different injection scenarios at each tiltmeter site by numerical modelling. It could be demonstrated that for long term injection phases of up to four months a maximum tilt effect of about 40 nrad is modelled, which should be detectable. We expected changes of the drift curve, slow variations correlating with the injection rate as well as with changes of the rate.

First results of the monitoring are presented: they reveal a slight increase of the tidal parameters (main tidal constituent O1 and M2, north-south component) and drifts associated with the long-term injection. Comprehensive numerical modelling using the Finite Element software ABAQUS is in preparation.

Keywords

Surface tilt measurements fluid injection KTB drill hole ASKANIA tiltmeter tidal parameters upper Earth crust 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baitenberg, C, and M. Zadro, (2001). Time Series Modelling of the Hydrologic Signal in Geodetic Measurements. Proc. 14 th International Symposium on Earth Tides, Special Issue of the Journal of the Geodetic Soc. of Japan, Vol. 47/1, pp. 95–100.Google Scholar
  2. Fujimori, K., H. Ishii, A. Mukai, S. Nakao, S. Matsumoto, and Y. Hirata, (2001). Strain and tilt changes measured during a water injection experiment at the Nojima Fault zone, Japan. The Island Arc, 10, pp. 228–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ishii, H., G. Jentzsch, S. Graupner, S. Nakao, M. Ramatschi, and A. Weise, (2001). Observatory Nokogiriyama / Japan: Comparison of different tiltmeters. Proc. 14 th International Symposium on Earth Tides, Special Issue of the Journal of the Geodetic Soc. of Japan, 47/1, 155–160.Google Scholar
  4. Jahr, T., G. Jentzsch, H. Letz, H., and M. Sauter (2005a) Fluid injection and surface deformation at the KTB location: Modelling of expected tilt effects. Geofluids 5, pp. 20–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Jahr, T., Letz, H. & Jentzsch, G., (2005b) The ASKANIA borehole tiltmeter array at the KTB location / Germany. — Journ. of Geodynamics (accepted).Google Scholar
  6. Jentzsch, G., and S. Koß, (1997). Interpretation of long-period tilt records at Blå Sjø, Southern Norway, with respect to the variations of the lake level. Phys. Chem. Earth, 22, pp. 25–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Jentzsch, G., P. Malischewsky, M. Zadro, C. Braitenberg, A. Latynina, E. Bojarsky, T. Verbytzkyy, A. Tikhomirov, and A. Kurskeev, (2001). Relations between different geodynamic parameters and seismicity in areas of high and low seismic hazards. Proc. 14 th International Symposium on Earth Tides, Special Issue of the Journal of the Geodetic Soc. of Japan, 47/1, 82–87.Google Scholar
  8. Kümpel, H.-J., J.A. Peters, and D.R. Bower, (1988). Nontidal tilt and water table variations in a seismically active region in Quebec, Canada, Tectonophysics, 152, pp. 253–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Weise, A., G. Jentzsch, A. Kiviniemi, and J. Kääriäinen, (1999). Comparison of long-period tilt measurements: Results from the two clinometric stations Metsähovi and Lohja, Finland. J. of Geodynamics, 27, pp. 237–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Westerhaus, M., and J. Zschau, (2001). No clear evidence for temporal variations of tidal tilt prior to the 1999 Izmit and Düzce earthquakes in NW-Anatolia. Proc. 14 th International Symposium on Earth Tides, Special Issue of the Journal of the Geodetic Soc. of Japan, 47/1, 448–455.Google Scholar
  11. Zoback, M.D., and H.-P. Harjes, (1997). Injection-induced earthquakes and crustal stress at 9 km depth at the KTB deep drilling site, Germany. J. Geophys. Res., 102(B8), pp. 18477–18492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. Jahr
    • 1
  • G. Jentzsch
    • 1
  • H. Letz
    • 1
  • A. Gebauer
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Geosciences, Department of Applied GeophysicsUniversity of JenaJenaGermany

Personalised recommendations