Advertisement

Decision Support for Emergency Situations

  • Bartel van de Walle
  • Murray Turoff
Part of the International Handbooks Information System book series (INFOSYS)

Abstract

Emergency situations occur unpredictably and cause individuals and organizations to shift their focus and attention immediately to deal with the situation. When disasters become large scale, all the limitations resulting from a lack of integration and collaboration among all the involved organizations begin to be exposed and further compound the negative consequences of the event. Often in large-scale disasters the people who must work together have no history of doing so; they have not developed a trust or understanding of one another’s abilities, and the totality of resources they each bring to bear have never before been exercised. As a result, the challenges for individual or group decision support systems (DSS) in emergency situations are diverse and immense. In this contribution, we present recent advances in this area and highlight important challenges that remain.

Keywords

Decision Support System Information Security Emergency Situation Emergency Response Emergency Preparedness 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agarwal, R. and E. Karahanna, “Time Flies When You’re Having Fun: Cognitive Absorption and Beliefs About Information Technology Usage,” MIS Quart, 24(4), 2000, 665-694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barnard, L. and R. Von Solms, “A Formalized approach to the Effective Selection and Evaluation of Information Security Controls,” Comput Secur, 8(3), 2000, 185-194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baumgartner, F.R. and B.D. Jones, Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993.Google Scholar
  4. Bellardo, S., K.R. Karwan and W.A. Wallace, “Managing the Response to Disasters Using Microcomputers,” Interfaces, 14(2), 1984, 29-39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bigley, G. and K. Roberts, “The Incident Command System: High Reliability Organizing for Complex and Volatile Task Environments,” Acad Manage J, 44(6), 2001, 1281-2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bui, T.X. and S.R. Sankaran, “Design Considerations for a virtual information center for humanitarian assistance/disaster relief using workflow modeling,” Decis Support Syst, 31, 2001, 165-179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Doughty, K., “Business continuity: A Business Survival Strategy,” Inform Syst Contr J , 1, 2002, 28-36.Google Scholar
  8. Currion, P., Keynote address at the 3 rd International Conference on Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management ISCRAM2006, Newark, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  9. Drew, S., “Reducing Enterprise Risk with Effective Threat Management,” Inform Sec Manage, January/February, 2005, 37-42.Google Scholar
  10. ECHO Humanitarian Aid Decision 230201, 2005. Decision Reference ECHO/THM/BUD/2005/02000.Google Scholar
  11. Ehrhardt, J. and A. Weiss, RODOS : Decision Support for Off-Site Nuclear Emergency Management in Europe, EUR19144EN, 2000, Luxemburg, European Community.Google Scholar
  12. Ellis, J.S., R.L. Lee, D.A. Sumkawa and T.J. Sullivan, “ARAC and Its Modernisation,” Radiat Prot Dosim, 73(1-4), 1997, 241-245.Google Scholar
  13. FEMA News release 1603-516, By the Numbers: Hurricanes Katrina and Rita Disaster Assistance Update, July 31, 2006. Accessed via http://www.fema.gov/news/newsrelease.fema?id=28379.Google Scholar
  14. Fisher, H.W., “The Role of new Information Technologies in Emergency Mitigation, Planning, Response and Recovery,” Disast Prev Manage, 7(1), 1998, 28-37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fodor, J. and M. Roubens, Fuzzy Preference Modeling and Multicriteria Decision Support. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1994.Google Scholar
  16. French, S., J. Bartzis, J. Ehrhardt, J. Lochard, M. Morrey, N. Papamichail, K. Sinkko and A. Sohier, “RODOS: Decision support for nuclear emergencies,” in Zanakis, S.H., Doukidis, G. and Zopounidis, G. (eds.), Recent Developments and Applications in Decision Making. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2000, pp. 379-394.Google Scholar
  17. French, S. and C. Niculae, “Believe in the Model: Mishandle the Emergency,” J Home Sec Emergen Manage, 2(1), 2005.Google Scholar
  18. Hiltz, S.R., J. Fjermestad, R. Ocker and M. Turoff, “Asynchronous Virtual Teams: Can Software Tools and Structuring of Social Processes Enhance Performance?,” in Galleta, D., Zhang, P. and Sharpe, M.E. (eds.), Volume II: Human-Computer Interaction in Management Information Systems: Applications, 2005.Google Scholar
  19. Humanitarian ICT Yahoo! Group. Accessed via http://groups.yahoo.com/group/humanitarian-ict/.Google Scholar
  20. ISO 17799, 2005. Information technology - Security techniques - Code of practice for information security management. August 2005. Accessed via http://www.iso.org/iso/en/prods-services/popstds/informationsecurity.html.Google Scholar
  21. Janczewski, L., and F. Xinli Shi, “Development of Information Security Baselines for Healthcare Information Systems in New Zealand,” Comput Secur, 21(2), 2002, 172-192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Janis, I.L., Groupthink: Psychological studies of policy decisions and fiascoes. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin, 1982.Google Scholar
  23. Jennex, M., “Emergency Response Systems: the Utility Y2K Experience,” J Inform Technol Theor Appl, 6(3), 2004, 85-102.Google Scholar
  24. Keil, M., A. Tiwana and A. Bush, “Reconciling user and project manager perceptions of IT project risk: a Delphi study,” Inform Syst J, 12, 2002, 103-119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. King, D., “VISTA, a visualization analysis tool for Humanitarian Situational Awareness,” in Van de Walle, B. and Turoff, M. (eds.), Proceedings of the 3 rd International Conference on Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management ISCRAM2006, pp. 11-16.Google Scholar
  26. King, G., “Crisis management and team effectiveness: a closer examination,” J Bus Ethics, 41(3), 2002, 235-249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kobayashi, K., T. Ishigami and T. Akiyama, “COSTA: A Computerized Support System for Emergency Technical Advice,” Radiat Prot Dosim, 73(1-4), 1997, 277-280.Google Scholar
  28. Linstone, H. and M. Turoff, (eds.), The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications. Addison Wesley Advanced Book Program, 1975, now online via http://is.njit.edu/turoff.Google Scholar
  29. Ma, Q. and M. Pearson, “ISO 17799: ‘Best practices’ in information security management?,” Commun ACM, 15, 2005, 577-591.Google Scholar
  30. Markillie, P., “When the Supply Chain Breaks: Being too lean and mean is a dangerous things,” The Economist, June 17, 2006, 16-28, in a special section on “The Physical Internet: A survey of logistics,” 3-18.Google Scholar
  31. Marsden, P. and E. Hollnagel, “Human interaction with technology: The accidental user,” Acta Psychol, 91, 1996, 345-358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mowshowitz, A., Virtual Organization: Toward a Theory of Societal Transformation Stimulated by Information Technology. Westport, CN: Quorum, 2002.Google Scholar
  33. Mowshowitz, A., “On the Theory of Virtual Organization,” Syst Res Behav Sci, 14(6), 1997, 373-384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Niculae, C., “A socio-technical perspective on the use of RODOS in nuclear emergency management,” Ph. D. dissertation, Manchester Business School, 2005.Google Scholar
  35. Nunamaker, J.F., Jr., A.R. Dennis, J.S. Valacich, D.R. Vogel and J.F. George, “Electronic Meeting Systems to Support Group Work: Theory and Practice at Arizona,” Commun ACM, 34(7), 1991, 40-61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Parker, D.B., Fighting Computer Crime, A New Framework for Protecting Information. New York, NY: Wiley, 1998.Google Scholar
  37. Raskob, W., V. Bertsch, J. Geldermann, S. Baig and F. Gering, “Demands to and experience with the Decision Support System RODOS for off-site emergency management in the decision making process in Germany,” in Van de Walle, B. and Carle, B. (eds.), Proceedings of the Second International ISCRAM Conference ISCRAM2005, 2005.Google Scholar
  38. Rice, R.E., “From Adversity to Diversity: Applications of Communication Technology to Crisis Management,” Adv Telecommun Manage, 3, 1990, 91-112.Google Scholar
  39. Roberts, K.H., “Managing High Reliability Organizations,” Calif Manage Rev, Summer 1990, 101-113.Google Scholar
  40. Roberts, K. and R. Bea, “Must Accidents Happen?: Lessons from High Reliability Organizations,” Acad Manage Exec, 15(3), 2001, 70-79.Google Scholar
  41. Rutkowski, A.-F., B. Van de Walle, W. van Groenendaal and J. Pol, “When stakeholders perceive threats and risks differently: the use of group support systems to develop a common understanding and a shared response,” J Home Sec Emergen Manage, 2(1), 2005, 17.Google Scholar
  42. Rutkowski, A.-F., B. Van de Walle and G. Van Den Eede, “The effect of GSS on the emergence of unique information in a risk management process: a field study,” in Proceedings of HICSS40, 2006, 9 pages.Google Scholar
  43. Sahana Wiki Community, 2006. Accessed via http://www.reliefsource.org/foss/index.php/SahanaGoogle Scholar
  44. Shershakov, V.M., R.V. Borodin and V.S. Kosykh, “Radioecological analysis support system (RECASS),” Radiat Prot Dosim, 50, 1993, 181-184.Google Scholar
  45. Spillan, J.E. and M. Hough, “Crisis planning in small businesses: importance, impetus and indifference,” Eur Manage J, 21(3), 2003, 389-407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Staw, B., I. Sandelands and J. Dutton, “Threat-Rigidity Effects in Organizational Behavior: A Multilevel Analysis,” Admin Sci Quart, 26, 1981, 501-524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Stoneburner, G., A. Goguen and A. Feringa, “Risk Management Guide for Information Technology Systems,” in Recommendations of the National Institute of Standards and Technology, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Technology Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, NIST Special Publication 800-30, October 2001.Google Scholar
  48. Suh, B. and I. Han, “The risk analysis based on a business model,” Inform Manage, 2003, 1-9.Google Scholar
  49. Terada, H., A. Furuno and M. Chino, “Improvement of worldwide version of system for prediction of environmental emergency dose information (WSPEEDI),” J Nucl Sci Technol, 41(5), 2004, 632-640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Turoff, M., “Past and Future Emergency Response Information Systems,” Commun ACM, 45(4), 2002, 29-32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Turoff, M., M. Chumer, R. Hiltz, R. Klashner, M. Alles, M. Vasarhelyi and A. Kogan, “Assuring Homeland Security: Continuous Monitoring, Control, and Assurance of Emergency Preparedness,” J Inform Technol Theor Appl, 6(3), 2004, 1-24.Google Scholar
  52. Turoff, M., M. Chumer, B. Van de Walle and X. Yao, “The design of a dynamic emergency response management information system,” J Inform Tech Theor Appl, 5(4), 2004, 1-36.Google Scholar
  53. Turoff, M., M. Chumer and S.R. Hiltz, “Emergency Planning as a Continuous Game,” in Proceedings of ISCRAM 2006 (The third international Conference on Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management), NJIT, Newark NJ, May 2006, pp. 477-488.Google Scholar
  54. U.K. Airport News 2006. Accessed via http://www.uk-airport-news.info/heathrow-airport-news-140806b.htm.Google Scholar
  55. Van Den Eede, G., B. Van de Walle and A.-F. Rutkowski, “Dealing with risk in incident management: an application of High Reliability Theory,” in Proceedings of HICSS40, 2006, 10 pages.Google Scholar
  56. Van Den Eede, G., W. Muhren, R. Smals and B. Van de Walle, “Incident Response Information Systems Capability: the role of the DERMIS design premises,” in Van de Walle, B. and Turoff, M. (eds.), Proceedings of the 3 rd International Conference on Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management ISCRAM2006, 2006, pp.251–261.Google Scholar
  57. Van de Walle, B., B. De Baets and E.E. Kerre, “Characterizable Fuzzy Preference structures,” Ann Oper Res, 80, 1998, 105–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Van de Walle, B., “A relational analysis of decision makers’ preferences,” Int J Intell, 18, 2003, 775–791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Van de Walle, B., and A.-F. Rutkowski, “A Fuzzy Decision Support System for IT Service Continuity Threat Assessment,” Decis Support Syst, 2006, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  60. Van de Walle, B. and M. Turoff, “ISCRAM: growing a global R&D Community in Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management,” Int J Emerg Manage, 2006, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  61. Vogus, T.J., and T.M. Welbourne, “Structuring for high reliability: HR practices and mindful processes in reliability-seeking organizations,” J Organ Behav, 24, 2003, 877–903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Von Solms, R., “Information security management (3): the Code of Practice for Information Security Management (BS 7799),” Inform Manage Comput Sec, 6(5), 1998, 224-225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Weick, K., “Organizational Culture as a Source of High Reliability,” Calif Manage Rev, 29(2), 1987, 112-127.Google Scholar
  64. Weick, K.E., K.M. Sutcliffe and D. Obstfeld “Organizing for High Reliability: Processes of Collective Mindfulness,” Res Organ Behav, 21, 1999, 81-123.Google Scholar
  65. Weick, K.E. and K.M. Sutcliffe, Managing the unexpected: Assuring High Performance in an Age of Complexity. San Francisco, CalCA: Wiley, 2001.Google Scholar
  66. Williams, T.M., F. Ackermann and C. Eden, “Project Risk: Systemicity, cause mapping and a scenario approach,” in Kahkonen, K. and Artoo, K.A. (eds.), Managing Risks in Projects. London: E&FN spon, 1997, 343-352.Google Scholar
  67. Wolf, F., “Operationalizing and testing normal accidents in petrochemical plants and refineries,” Prod Oper Manag, 10(3), 2001, 292-305.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bartel van de Walle
    • 1
  • Murray Turoff
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Information Systems and ManagementTilburg UniversityTilburgNetherlands
  2. 2.Department of Information SystemsNew Jersey Institute of TechnologyNewarkUSA

Personalised recommendations