DSS Systems Analysis and Design: The Role of the Analyst as Change Agent

  • Kenneth E. Kendall
  • Julie E. Kendall
Chapter
Part of the International Handbooks Information System book series (INFOSYS)

Abstract

We explore the critical role played by decision support system (DSS) developers (also called systems analysts or DSS designers) as they enact the role of the change agent. In DSS development, systems analysts actively strive to change the decision maker directly through the DSS application and its presentation. We suggest that the role of change advocate serves DSS development the best, chiefly because decision makers’ enhanced interest in emerging information technologies has made it possible for decision makers to accept new Web-based DSS technologies. We also briefly explore some of the issues in the development of decision support systems over time and the importance they will play in the future. We illustrate what a systems analyst should take into consideration in designing a DSS display today, using a dashboard as an example. We then describe new tools used for DSS development such as widgets, gadgets, and mashups that once again may change the way decision makers solve problems. We see a promising future for changing decision makers as they interact with the analyst as a change agent and can visualize decision makers evolving through their DSS interactions, thereby improving decision quality, and creating a strong, contributory role for analysts to play in DSS development.

Keywords

Decision Maker Decision Support System Application Program Interface Cognitive Style Change Agent 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aboutairportparking.com, 2007. Accessed via http://www.aboutairportparking.com/.Google Scholar
  2. Akin, G. and I. Palmer, “Putting Metaphors to Work for Change in Organizations,” Organizational Dynamics, Winter 2000, 67-79.Google Scholar
  3. Apple Computer, 2007. Accessed via http://www.apple.com/downloads/dashboard/.Google Scholar
  4. Baebo, 2007. Accessed via http://baebo.francisshanahan.com/.Google Scholar
  5. Bennis, W., “Change Agents,” Executive Excellence, 10(9), 1993,18-19.Google Scholar
  6. Blipstar, 2007. Accessed via http://www.webmashup.com/cgi-bin/jump.cgi?ID=141.Google Scholar
  7. Bogozo, 2007. Accessed via http://www.bogozo.com/house/?new+york.Google Scholar
  8. Brousseau K.R., M. Driver, G. Hourihan and R. Larsson, “The Seasoned Executive’s Decision Making Style,” Harvard Bus Rev, 84, February 2006, 111-121.Google Scholar
  9. Business Week, “Mix, Match, and Mutate,” 2005. Accessed via http://www.businessweek.com/@@76IH*ocQ34AvyQMA/magazine/content/05_30/b3944108_mz063.htm.Google Scholar
  10. Census Dashboard, 2007. Accessed via http://www.cynergysystems.com/blogs/blogs/andrew.trice/strikeiron/Dashboard.html.Google Scholar
  11. Craigslist, 2007. Accessed via http://newyork.craigslist.org/.Google Scholar
  12. Davidson, J. and R. Dornfest, Mac OS X Panther Hacks: 100 Industrial-Strength Tips and Tools. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly, 2004, pp. 49-57.Google Scholar
  13. de Berranger, P., D. Tucker and L. Jones, “Internet Diffusion in Creative Micro-Businesses: Identifying Change Agent Characteristics as Critical Success Factors,” J Org Comp Elect Com, 11(3), 2001, 197-214.Google Scholar
  14. Dologite, D.G., R.J. Mockler, W. Bai and P.F. Viszhanyo, “IS Change Agents in Practice in a US-Chinese joint Venture,” J Glob Inf Manag, October, 2004.Google Scholar
  15. Eckerson, W., Performance Dashboards : Measuring, Monitoring, and Managing Your Business. Indianapolis, IN: Wiley, 2005.Google Scholar
  16. Eom, S.B., “Decision Support Systems Research: Current State and Trends,” Ind Manage Data Syst, 99(5), 1999, 213-222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Few, S., Information Dashboard Design: The Effective Visual Communication of Data. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly, 2006.Google Scholar
  18. Gachet, A. and P. Haettenschwiler, “A Decentralized Approach to Distributed Decision Support Systems,” J Decis Syst, 12(2), 2003, 141-158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Garg, R.K. and T.P. Singh, “Status of Socio-Technical Change in Indian Automobile Industry-A Longitudinal Study,” Global J Flex Syst Manage, 2005, 6(3-4), 25-37.Google Scholar
  20. Gerber, R.S., “Mixing It Up on the Web: Legal Issues Arising from Internet ‘Mashups,”’ Intell Prop Tech Law J, 18(8), August 2006, 11-14.Google Scholar
  21. Gibson, R. and S. Erle, Google Maps Hacks. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly, 2006.Google Scholar
  22. Global Incident Map, 2007. Accessed via http://www.globalincidentmap.com/home.php.Google Scholar
  23. Google, 2007. Accessed via http://desktop.google.com/plugins/.Google Scholar
  24. Google Maps, 2007. Accessed via http://Aboutairportparking.com.Google Scholar
  25. Hawkee Social Price Comparison, 2007. Accessed via http://www.hawkee.com/.Google Scholar
  26. Health Care That Works, 2007. Accessed via http://www.healthcarethatworks.org/maps/nyc/.Google Scholar
  27. Homethinking, 2007. Accessed via http://www.homethinking.com/.Google Scholar
  28. Huber, G., “Cognitive Style as a Basis For MIS and DSS Designs: Much Ado About Nothing?,” Manage Sci, 29(5), 1983, 567-577.Google Scholar
  29. Hugos, M., “How to Become a Change Agent,” CIO Magazine, October 15, 2005. Accessed via http://www.cio.com/archive/101505/leadership.html.Google Scholar
  30. IBM, The ultimate mashup – Web services and the semantic Web, 2006. Accessed via http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/edu/x-dw-x-ultimashup1.html.Google Scholar
  31. Jarvenpaa, S., “The Effect of Task Demands and Graphical Format on Information Processing Strategies,” Manage Sci, 35(3), 1989, 285-303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Joyce, J., “The Fabulous Konfabulator,” Sci Comput, 23(1), 2005, 14-54.Google Scholar
  33. Kendall, J.E. and K.E. Kendall, “Metaphors and their Meaning for Information Systems Development,” Eur J Inform Syst, 3(1), 1994, 37-47.Google Scholar
  34. Kendall, J.E., K.E. Kendall and S. Kong, “Improving Quality Through The Use Of Agile Methods in Systems Development: People and Values in the Quest for Quality,” in Duggan, E.W. and Reichgelt, H. (eds.), Measuring Information Systems Delivery Quality. Hershey, PA: Idea Group, 2006, Chapter IX, pp. 201-222.Google Scholar
  35. Kendall, J.E., K.E. Kendall, S. Smithson and I.O. Angell, “SEER: A Divergent Methodology Applied to Forecasting the Future Roles of the Systems Analyst,” Hum Syst Manage, 11(3), 1992, 123-135.Google Scholar
  36. Kendall, J.E. and M.J. Schniederjans, “Implementing a Markov-based Accounts Receivable DSS: A Prototyping Approach,” J Microcomput Syst Manage, 3(4), 1991, 2–9.Google Scholar
  37. Kendall, K.E., “A Decentralized Information and Control System for Blood Management,” J Syst Software, 1, 1980, 299-306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kendall, K.E., J.E. Kendall, and J.R. Buffington, “The Relationship of Organizational Subcultures to DSS User Satisfaction,” Hum Syst Manage, 7, 1987, 31-39.Google Scholar
  39. Kendall, K.E., J.E. Kendall and J.R. Buffington, “Implications of Organizational Subcultures for DSS Design,” in Klein, H.K. and Kumar, K. (eds.), Systems Development for Human Progress. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: North Holland, 1989, pp. 157-167.Google Scholar
  40. Kendall, K.E. and B.A. Schuldt, “Decentralizing Decision Support Systems: A Field Experiment with Drug and Criminal Investigators,” Decis Support Syst, 9, 1993, 259-268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kendra, K.A. and L.J. Taplin, “Change Agent Competencies for Information Technology Project Managers,” Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 56(1), 2004, 20-34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. King, R., “When Companies Do the Mash,” Business Week Online, November 13, 2006, p. 11.Google Scholar
  43. Koch, C., “Beyond Execution,” The State of the CIO Survey, 2007. Accessed via http://www.cio.com/state/fea_state_overview.html?action=print.Google Scholar
  44. Lee, C., H.K. Cheng and H. Cheng, “An Empirical Study of Mobile Commerce in Insurance Industry: Task-technology Fit and Individual Differences,“ Decis Support Syst, 43(1), 2007, 95-110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. MarketWatch: Technology, “Enterprise Mashups,” January, 2007a, 6(1), 183. Accessed via http://www.butlergroup.com.Google Scholar
  46. MarketWatch: Technology, “Don’t Let Mashups Become Smash-ups,” February, 2007b, 6(2), 20-21. Accessed via http://www.butlergroup.com.Google Scholar
  47. Markus, M.L. and R.I. Benjamin, “Change Agentry: The New IS Frontier,” MIS Quart, 20(4), 1996, 385-405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Markus, M.L. and R.I. Benjamin, “The Magic Bullet Theory in IT-enabled Transformation,” MIT Sloan Manage Rev, 1997, 38(2), 55-68.Google Scholar
  49. mpire, 2007. Accessed via http://www.mpire.com/buyer/search.page.Google Scholar
  50. Olsen, D., Developing User Interfaces. Morgan Kaufmann: 1998, pp. 195-214.Google Scholar
  51. On NY Turf, 2007. Accessed via http://www.onnyturf.com/citycouncil/freedomzones/.Google Scholar
  52. programmableweb, 2007. Accessed via http://www.programmableweb.com/.Google Scholar
  53. Ramaprasad, A., “Cognitive Process as a Basis for MIS And DSS Design,” Manage Sci, 33(2), 1987, 139-148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Robey, D., “Cognitive Style and DSS Design: A Comment on Huber’s Paper,” Manage Sci, 29(5), 1983, 580-582.Google Scholar
  55. Sauter, V.L and D. Free, “Competitive Intelligence Systems: Qualitative DSS for Strategic Decision Making,” Data Base Adv Inf Sy, 36(2), 2005, 43-57.Google Scholar
  56. Schuldt, B.A. and K.E. Kendall, “Case Progression Decision Support System Improves Drug and Criminal Investigator Effectiveness,” Omega, 21(3), 1993, 319-328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sprague, R., Jr. and E. Carlson, Building Effective Decision Support System s. Prentice Hall, 1982.Google Scholar
  58. Streeteasy, 2007. Accessed via http://www.streeteasy.com/.Google Scholar
  59. toolpack.com/change.html, “Resistance and Change Management,” 2007. Accessed via http://www.toolpack.com/change.html.Google Scholar
  60. Tufte, E., The Visual Display of Quantitative Information. Cheshire, CT: Graphics, 1983.Google Scholar
  61. Tufte, E., Visual Explanations. Cheshire, CT: Graphics, 1990.Google Scholar
  62. Tufte, E., Envisioning Information. Cheshire, CT: Graphics, 1997.Google Scholar
  63. Walter, G., “The CIO as Enterprise Change Agent (When IT Really Matters),” Analyst Corner, 2006. Accessed via http://www2.cio.com/analyst/report2632.html.Google Scholar
  64. Wenz, C., Programming Atlas. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly, 2006.Google Scholar
  65. Winston, E.R., “IS Consultants and the Change Agent Role,“ ACM SIGCPR Comput Personnel, 20(4), 1999, 55-74.Google Scholar
  66. Yahoo! Widgets, 2007. Accessed via http://widgets.yahoo.com/.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kenneth E. Kendall
    • 1
  • Julie E. Kendall
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Business-CamdenRutgers UniversityCamdenUSA

Personalised recommendations