Decision Support in Turbulent and High-Velocity Environments

  • Sven A. Carlsson
  • Omar A. El Sawy
Part of the International Handbooks Information System book series (INFOSYS)


This chapter examines issues concerned with supporting managers and organizations with information and communication technologies as they decide and act in turbulent and highvelocity environments. In particular, the chapter identifies five key tensions in this context: (i) the tension between the need for quick decisions and the need for analytical decision processes; (ii) the tension involving managerial need for action and the need for the safest execution of decisions that may be bold and risky; (iii) the tension around empowering middle managers and management teams at various organizational levels in the midst of powerful and impatient top executives; (iv) the tension between programmed, quick-action learning loops and the increased requirement for emergence and improvisation; and (v) the tension between expending effort to eliminate the digital divide with other organizations versus finding expedient ways to communicate through heterogeneous digital infrastructures. Each of the tensions, and how it can be managed, is illustrated through a case example. The chapter ends by suggesting that the management of these critical tensions needs to be fused into the day-to-day fabric of management practices for decision support processes.


Decision Support Digital Divide Harvard Business School Successful Organization Turbulent Environment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bekier, M.M., A.J. Bogardus and T. Oldham, “Why Mergers Fail,” McKinsey Q, 4, 2001.Google Scholar
  2. Bourgeois, L.J. and K.M. Eisenhardt, “Strategic Decision Processes in Silicon Valey: The Anatomy of a “Living Dead”,” Calif Manage Rev, 30, 1987, 143-159.Google Scholar
  3. Bourgeois, L.J. and K.M. Eisenhardt, “Strategic Decision Processes in High Velocity Environments: Four Cases in the Microcomputer Industry,” Manage Sci, 34(7), 1988, 816-835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boyd, J., Patterns of Conflict. Unpublished manuscript, USAF, 1986.Google Scholar
  5. Brunsson, N., The Organization of Hypocrisy: Talk, Decisions and Actions in Organizations. New York: Wiley, 1989.Google Scholar
  6. Carlsson, S.A., “Designing DSS Based on an Attention-Based View of the Firm,” in Adam, F., Brézillon, P., Humphreys, P. and Pomerol, J.-C.(eds.), Decision Making and Decision Support in the Internet Age. Cork, Ireland: Oak Tree, 2002, pp. 635-646.Google Scholar
  7. Carlsson, S.A., D.E. Leidner and J.J. Elam, “Individual and Organizational Effectiveness: Perspectives on the Impact of ESS in Multinational Organizations,” in Humphreys, P., Bannon, L., McCosh, A., Migliarese, P. and Pomerol, J.C. (eds.), Implementing Systems for Supporting Management Decisions: Concepts Methods and Experiences. London: Chapman and Hall, 1996, pp. 91-107.Google Scholar
  8. Chung, R. and K. Paddack, “CEMEX: global growth through superior information capabilities,” International Institute for Management Development, Case IMD134, Lausanne, Switzerland, 2003.Google Scholar
  9. Curtis, R. and D. Campbell, “Avoiding Information Overload through the Understanding of OODA Loops,” in Proceedings of the Command & Control Technology Research Symposium, 2001.Google Scholar
  10. Daft, R.L. and R.H. Lengel, “Organizational Information Requirements, Media Richness, and Structural Design,” Manage Sci, 32(5), 1986, 554-571.Google Scholar
  11. Daft, R.L., J. Sourmunen and D. Parks, “Chief Executive Scanning, Environmental Characteristics, and Company Performance: An Empirical Study,” Strategic Manage J, 9, 1988, 123-139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Davenport, T.H. and J.G. Harris, Competing on Analytics: The New Science of Winning. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 2007.Google Scholar
  13. Eckerson, W.W., Performance Dashboards: Measuring, Monitoring, and Managing Your Business. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2006.Google Scholar
  14. Eisenhardt, K.M., “Making Fast Strategic Decisions in High-Velocity Environments,” Acad Manage J, 32(3), 1989, 543-576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Eisenhardt, K.M., “Speed and Strategic Choice: How Managers Accelerate Decision Making,” Calif Manage Rev, Spring, 1990, 39-54.Google Scholar
  16. Eisenhardt, K.M. and L.J. Bourgeois, “Politics of Strategic Decision Making in High-Velocity Environments: Toward a Midrange Theory,” Acad Manage J, 31(4), 1988, 737-770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Eisenhardt, K.M. and L.J. Bourgeois, “Charting Strategic Decisions in the Microcomputer Industry: Profile of an Industry Star,” in Von Glinow and Mohrman (eds.), Managing Complexity in High Technology Organizations. New York: Oxford University Press, 1990, pp. 554-571.Google Scholar
  18. El Sherif, H. and O.A. El Sawy, “Issue-Based Decision Support Systems for the Egyptian Cabinet,” MIS Q, 12(4), 1988, 550-569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. El Sawy, O.A., “Personal Information Systems for Strategic Scanning in Turbulent Environments: Can the CEO Go On-line?,” MIS Q, 9(1), 1985, 53-60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. El Sawy, O.A. and P. Pavlou, “Strategic Management of IT-Enabled Capabilities in Turbulent Environments: What Happens When the Music Speeds Up,” SIM Academic Workshop, Milwaukee, Dec 2006.Google Scholar
  21. El Sawy, O.A. and A. Majchrzak, “Critical Issues in Research on Real-Time Knowledge Management in Enterprises,” J Knowl Manage, 8(4), 2004, 21-37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ghemawat, P. and J.L. Matthews, “The Globalization of CEMEX,” Harvard Business School, Case 9-701-017, Boston, MA, 2004.Google Scholar
  23. Gladwell, M., Blink: The Power of Thinking without Thinking. New York, NY: Little, Brown, 2005.Google Scholar
  24. Haeckel, S., Adaptive Enterprise: Creating and Leading Sense-and-Respond Organizations. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 1999.Google Scholar
  25. Haeckel, S. and R. Nolan, “Managing by Wire,” Harvard Bus Rev, Sep-Oct, 1993, 122-132.Google Scholar
  26. Henry, D., “There’s No Magic in Mergers,” Business Week, 60, 2002.Google Scholar
  27. Houghton, B., O.A. El Sawy, P. Gray, C. Donegan and A. Joshi, “Vigilant Information Systems for Managing Enterprises in Dynamic Supply Chains: Real-Time Dashboards at Western Digital,” MIS Q Exec, 3(1), 2004, 19-35.Google Scholar
  28. Huber, G.P., The Necessary Nature of Future Firms: Attributes of Survivors in a Changing World. London: Sage, 2003.Google Scholar
  29. KPMG. World Class Transactions: Insights into Creating Shareholder Value through Mergers and Acquisitions. KPMG, 2001.Google Scholar
  30. Krogh, E., O.A. El Sawy and P.Gray, “Managing Online in Perpetual Perfect Storms: Insights from IndyMac Bank,” MIS Q Exec, 4(4), 2005, 426-442.Google Scholar
  31. Majchrzak, A., D. Logan, R. McCurdy and M. Kirchmer, “Four Keys to Managing Emergence,” Sloan Manage Rev, 47(2), 2006, 14-18.Google Scholar
  32. Norton, L., “Merger Mayhem,” Barron’s, 1998.Google Scholar
  33. Pfeffer, J., Managing with Power: Politics and Influence in Organizations. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 1992.Google Scholar
  34. Porter, M.E., Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors. New York, NY: Free, 1980.Google Scholar
  35. Simons, R., Levers of Control: How Managers Use Innovative Control Systems to Drive Strategic Renewal. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 1995.Google Scholar
  36. Sirower, M.L., “Investor Communications: New Rules for M&A Success,” Financ Exec, 19(1), 2003, 26-30.Google Scholar
  37. Stalk, G. and T. Hout, Competing Against Time. New York, NY: Free, 1990.Google Scholar
  38. Walls, J., G. Widmeyer and O. El Sawy, “Building an Information System Design Theory for Vigilant EIS,” Inform Syst Res, 3(1), 1992, 36-59.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sven A. Carlsson
    • 1
  • Omar A. El Sawy
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Economics and ManagementLund UniversityLundSweden
  2. 2.Marshall School of BusinessUniversity of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations