Advertisement

Advisory Systems to Support Decision Making

  • Brandon A. Beemer
  • Dawn G. Gregg
Part of the International Handbooks Information System book series (INFOSYS)

Abstract

Both advisory systems and expert systems provide expertise to support decision making in a myriad of domains. Expert systems are used to solve problems in well defined, narrowly focused problem domains, whereas advisory systems are designed to support decision making in more unstructured situations which have no single correct answer. This paper provides an overview of advisory systems, which includes the organizational needs that they address, similarities and differences between expert and advisory systems, and the supportive role advisory systems play in unstructured decision making.

Keywords

Decision Maker Expert System Decision Support System Inference Engine Human Decision Maker 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. AI Developers, EZ-Xpert 3.0, July 1, 2006. Accessed via http://www.ez-xpert.com/index.html.Google Scholar
  2. Arendt, L.A., R.L. Priem and H.A. Ndofor, “A CEO-Advisor Model of Strategic Decision Making,” Journal of Management, 31(5), 2005, 680-699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aronson, J. and E. Turban, Decision Support Systems and Intelligent Systems. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 2001.Google Scholar
  4. Bellman, R.E. and L.A. Zadeh, “Decision-Making in a Fuzzy Environment,” Management Science, 17(4), 1970, 141-164.Google Scholar
  5. Blanning, R.W, “Expert Systems as an Organizational Paradigm,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems, 1987, pp. 232-240.Google Scholar
  6. Bonnisone, P.P. and H.E. Johnson, Expert System for Diesel Electric Locomotive Repair: Knowledge-based System Report. New York, NY: General Electric Company, 1983.Google Scholar
  7. Bradley, J.H, R. Paul and E. Seeman, “Analyzing the structure of Expert Knowledge,” Information and Management, 43(1), 2006, 77-91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bradley, J.H. and R. Hauser, “A Framework for Expert System Implementation,” Expert Systems With Applications, 8(1), 1995, 157-167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brim, O., G.C. David, C. Glass, D.E. Lavin and N. Goodman, Personality and Decision Processes. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1962.Google Scholar
  10. Carroll, J.M. and J. McKendree, “Interface Design Issues For Advice-Giving Expert Systems,” Communications of the ACM, 30(1), 1987, 14-31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Castillo, E., J.M. Gutiérrez and A.S. Hadi, Expert Systems and Probabilistic Network Models. Berlin: Springer, 1997.Google Scholar
  12. Chandler, P. R. and M. Pachter, “Research Issues in Autonomous Control of Tactical UAVs,” in Proceedings of the American Control Conference, 1998, pp. 394-398.Google Scholar
  13. Chau, K., “An Expert System on Design of Liquid-Retaining Structures With Blackboard Architecture,” Expert Systems, 21(4), 2004, 183-191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Davis, F.D., R.P. Bagozzi and P.R. Warshaw, “User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models,” Management Science, 35(8), 1989, 982-1003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Demir, C., S.H. Gultekin and B. Yener, “Learning the Topological Properties of Brain Tumors,” IEEE/ACM Transactions of Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, 1(3), 2005, 262-270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Denver 9 News, “Technology Helps Road Crews Fight Snow,” October 27, 2006. Accessed www.9news.com/news/article.aspx?storyid=41091. Google Scholar
  17. Dewey, J., How We Think. Mineola, NY: Dover, 1910.Google Scholar
  18. Feigenbaum, E., P. McCorduck and H.P. Nii, The Rise of the Expert Company. New York, NY: Times Books, 1988.Google Scholar
  19. Fonseca, D. and E. Richards, “A Knowledge-based System for the Recycling of Non-hazardous Industrial Residuals in Civil Engineering Applications,” Expert Systems, 22(1), 2005, 1-11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Forslund, G., “Toward Cooperative Advice-Giving Systems: A Case Study in Knowledge Based Decision Support,” IEEE Expert, 1995, 56-62.Google Scholar
  21. Giarranto, J.C. and G.D. Riley, Expert Systems : Principles and Programming. Boston, MA: Thompson Course Technology, 2005.Google Scholar
  22. Gefen, D., E. Karahanna and D.W. Straub, “Trust and TAM in Online Shopping: An Integrated Model,” MIS Quarterly, 27(1), 2003, 51-90.Google Scholar
  23. Gregg, D. and S. Walczak, “Auction Advisor: Online Auction Recommendation and Bidding Decision Support System,” Decision Support Systems, 41(2), 2006, 449-471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hata, Y., S. Kobashi, K. Kondo, Y. Kitamura and T. Yanagida, “Transcra- nial Ultrasonography System for Visualizing Skull and Brain Surface Aided by Fuzzy Expert System,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, 35(6), 2005, 1360-1373.Google Scholar
  25. Hill, T.R., “Toward Intelligent Decision Support Systems: Survey, Assessment and Direction,” in Proceedings from International Conference on Information Systems, 1987.Google Scholar
  26. Holsapple, C.W. and A.B. Whinston, Business Expert Systems, Homewood, IL: Dow Jones-Irwin, 1987.Google Scholar
  27. Karbowski, A. and N.S. Malinowski, “A Hybrid Analytic/Rule-based Approach to Reservoir System Management During Flood,” Decision Support Systems, 38(4), 2005, 599-610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lin, W.W., A.K. Wong and T. Dillon, “Application of Soft Computing Techniques to Adaptive User Buffer Overflow Control on the Internet,” IEEE Transaction on Systems, 36(3), 2006, 397-410.Google Scholar
  29. Liker, J. and A. Sindi, “User Acceptance of Expert Systems: A Test of The Theory of Reasoned Action,” Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 14(1), 1997, 147-173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Luger G., Artificial Intelligence: Structures and Strategies for Complex Problem Solving. Addison Wesley, 2005.Google Scholar
  31. Magni, C.A., S. Malagoli and G. Mastroleo, “An Alternative Approach to Firms’ Evaluation: Expert Systems and Fuzzy Logic,” International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 5(1), 2006, 195-225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. March, J.G. and H.A. Simon, Organizations. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 1958.Google Scholar
  33. McGraw, K. and K.A. Harbison-Briggs, Knowledge Acquisition: Principles and Guidelines. NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1989.Google Scholar
  34. Miksch, S., K. Cheng and B. Hayes-Roth, “An intelligent assistant for patient health care,” in Proceedings of the First International Conference on Autonomous Agents, 1997, pp. 458-465.Google Scholar
  35. Mintzberg, H., The Nature of Managerial Work. New York, NY: Harper and Row, 1973.Google Scholar
  36. Mintzberg, H., D. Raisinghani and A. Theoret, “The Structure of ‘Unstructured’ Decision Processes,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 21(2), 1976, 246-275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Moynihan, G., A. Suki and D.J. Fonseca, “An Expert System for the Selection of Software Design Patterns,” Expert Systems, 23(1), 2006, 39-52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Negoita, C. V., Expert Systems and Fuzzy Systems. Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin/Cummings. 1985.Google Scholar
  39. Pryor, A., “Health Evaluation through Logical Processes System,” Med Syst, January 11, 2007. Accessed via www.med.utah.edu/index.html.Google Scholar
  40. Quinlan, J.R., “An Introduction to Knowledge-Based Expert Systems,” Australian Computer Journal, 12(2), 1980, 56-62.Google Scholar
  41. Quinlan, J.R., “Induction, Knowledge, and Expert Systems,” in J.S., Gero and Stanton, R. (eds.), Artificial Intelligence Developments and Applications. Amsterdam: North Holland, 1988, pp. 253-271.Google Scholar
  42. Rapanotti, L., “News,” Expert Systems, 21(3-4), 2004, 229-238.Google Scholar
  43. Roldán, J.L. and A. Leal, “Executive Information Systems in Spain: A Study of Current Practices and Comparative Analysis,” in Mora, M., Forgionne, G., and Gupta, J.N.D. (eds.), Decision Making Support Systems: Achievements, Trends and Challenges for the New Decade. Hershey: Ideal Group Publishing, 2003, pp. 287-304.Google Scholar
  44. Rubio, J. and J. Lizy-Kurian, “Reducing Server Data Traffic Using a Hierarchical Computation Model,” IEEE Transactions on Parallel & Distributed Systems, 16(10), 2005, 933-943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sayles, L.R., Managerial Behavior: Administration in Complex Organizations. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 1964.Google Scholar
  46. Simon, H.A., “Theories of Bounded Rationality,” in McGuire, C.B. and Radner, R. (eds.), Decision and Organization. Amsterdam, North Holland: 1972, pp. 162-176.Google Scholar
  47. Sniezek, J.A., “Judge Advisor Systems Theory and Research and Applications to Collaborative Systems and Technology,” in Proceedings of the 32nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 1999, pp. 1-2.Google Scholar
  48. Sniezek J.A. and T. Buckley, “Cueing and Cognitive Conflict in Judge-Advisor Decision Making,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 62(2), 1995, 159-174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Turban, E. and P.R. Watkins, “Integrating Expert Systems and Decision Support Systems,” MIS Quarterly, 10(2), 1986, 121-136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Vanguard Software Corporation, Decision Script, 2006. Accessed via www.vanguardsw.com/decisionscript/jgeneral.htm.Google Scholar
  51. Waugh, N.C. and D.A. Norman, “Primary Memory,” Psychological Review, 72, 1968, 89-104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Waterman, D.A., A guide to Expert Systems. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1986.Google Scholar
  53. Watson, I., “Case-Based Reasoning is a Methodology Not a Technology,” Knowledge Based Systems, 12(1), 1999, 303-308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Witte, E., “Field Research on Complex Decision-Making Processes - The Phase Theorem,” International Studies of Management and Organization, 2(2), 1972, 156-182.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Brandon A. Beemer
    • 1
  • Dawn G. Gregg
    • 1
  1. 1.Business SchoolUniversity of ColoradoDenverUSA

Personalised recommendations