Advertisement

Principles of Mobile Maude

  • Francisco Durán
  • Steven Eker
  • Patrick Lincoln
  • José Meseguer
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 1882)

Abstract

Mobile Maude is a mobile agent language extending the rewriting logic language Maude and supporting mobile computation. Mobile Maude uses reflection to obtain a simple and general declarative mobile language design and makes possible strong assurances of mobile agent behavior. The two key notions are processes and mobile objects. Processes are located computational environments where mobile objects can reside. Mobile objects have their own code, can move between different processes in different locations, and can communicate asynchronously with each other by means of messages. Mobile Maude’s key novel characteristics include: (1) reflection as a way of endowing mobile objects with “higher-order” capabilities; (2) object-orientation and asynchronous message passing; (3) a high-performance implementation of the underlying Maude basis; (4) a simple semantics without loss in the expressive power of application code; and (5) security mechanisms supporting authentication, secure message passing, and secure object mobility. Mobile Maude has been specified and prototyped in Maude. Here we present the Mobile Maude language for the first time, and illustrate its use in applications by means of Milner’s cell-phone example. We also discuss security and implementation issues.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Abadi, M., Gordon, A.: A calculus for cryptographic protocols: the spi calculus. Information and Computation 148, 1–70 (1999); An extended version of this paper appears as Research Report 149, Digital Equipment Corporation Systems Research Center (January 1998)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cardelli, L., Gordon, A.: Mobile ambients. In: Nivat, M. (ed.) FOSSACS 1998. LNCS, vol. 1378, pp. 140–155. Springer, Heidelberg (1998); (to appear in TCS July 2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ciancarini, P., Wolf, A.L. (eds.): COORDINATION 1999. LNCS, vol. 1594. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Clavel, M., Durán, F., Eker, S., Lincoln, P., Martí-Oliet, N., Meseguer, J., Quesada, J.: Maude: specification and programming in rewriting logic. SRI International (January 1999), http://maude.csl.sri.com
  5. 5.
    Clavel, M., Durán, F., Eker, S., Meseguer, J.: Building equational proving tools by reflection in rewriting logic. In: Proc. of the CafeOBJ Symposium 1998, Numazu, Japan, April 1998. CafeOBJ Project (1998), http://maude.csl.sri.com
  6. 6.
    Denker, G., Meseguer, J., Talcott, C.: Formal specification and analysis of active networks and communication protocols: the Maude experience. In: Proc. DARPA Information Survivability Conference and Exposition DICEX 2000, Hilton Head, South Carolina, vol. 1, pp. 251–265. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fournet, C., Gonthier, G.: The reflexive cham and the join-calculus. In: Proceedings of 23rd ACM Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages, pp. 52–66. ACM, New York (1996)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gray, R.S., Kotz, D., Cybenko, G., Rus, D.: D’Agents: Security in a multiple language, mobile-agent system. In: Vigna, G. (ed.) Mobile Agents and Security. LNCS, vol. 1419, pp. 154–187. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kotz, D., Gray, R.S.: Mobile agents and the future of the Internet. ACM Operating Systems Review 33(3), 7–13 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lange, D., Oshima, M.: Programming and Deploying Java Mobile Agents with Aglets. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1998)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lange, D.B., Oshima, M.: Seven good reasons for mobile agents. Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery 42, 88–89 (1999)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Martin, D., Cheyer, A., Moran, D.: The open agent architecture: A framework for building distributed software systems. Applied Artificial Intelligence 13, 91–128 (1999), (available via), http://www.ai.sri.com/~cheyer/papers/aai/oaa.html CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Meseguer, J.: Rewriting logic and Maude: a wide-spectrum semantic framework for object-based distributed systems. In: Proc. FMOODS 2000. Kluwer, Dordrecht (2000) (to appear) Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Meseguer, J.: Conditional rewriting logic as a unified model of concurrency. Theoretical Computer Science 96(1), 73–155 (1992)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Milner, R., Parrow, J., Walker, D.: A calculus of mobile processes (Parts I and II). Information and Computation 100, 1–77 (1992)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Roman, G., McCann, P., Plun, J.: Mobile UNITY: Reasoning and specification in mobile computing. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology 6, 250–282 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tripathi, A., Karnik, N., Vora, M., Ahmed, T., Singh, R.: Mobile agent programming in ajanta. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Confernce on Distributed Computing Systems, ICDCS 1999 (1999)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    White, J.: Telescript technology: the foundation for the electronic marketplace. General Magic White Paper, General Magic, Inc. (1994)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Francisco Durán
    • 1
  • Steven Eker
    • 1
  • Patrick Lincoln
    • 1
  • José Meseguer
    • 1
  1. 1.SRI InternationalMenlo ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations