Advertisement

Mobile Networking

  • Chris Blondia
  • Nik Van den Wijngaert
  • Gert Willems
  • Olga Casals
  • Llorenc Cerda
  • Marcelo Bagnulo
  • Ignacio Soto
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 2856)

Abstract

We point out the different performance problems that need to be addressed when considering mobility in IP networks. We also define the reference architecture and present a framework to classify the different solutions for mobility management in IP networks. The performance of the major candidate micro-mobility solutions is evaluated for both real-time (UDP) and data (TCP) traffic through simulation and by means of an analytical model. Using these models we compare the performance of different mobility management schemes for different data and real-time services and the network resources that are needed for it. We point out the problems of TCP in wireless environments and review some proposed enhancements to TCP that aim at improving TCP performance. We make a detailed study of how some of micro-mobility protocols namely Cellular IP, Hawaii and Hierarchical Mobile IP affect the behavior of TCP and their interaction with the MAC layer. We investigate the impact of handoffs on TCP by means of simulation traces that show the evolution of segments and acknowledgments during handoffs.

Keywords

Mobile Node Packet Loss Transmission Error Foreign Agent Correspond Node 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Johnson, D., Perkins, C.: Mobility Support in IPv6, Internet draft (July 2001) (work in progress)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Thomson, S., Narten, T.: IPv6 Stateless Address Autoconfiguration, RFC 2462 (December 1998)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Narten, T., Nordmark, E., Simpson, W.: Neighbor Discovery for IP Version 6 (IPv6), RFC 2461 (December 1998)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gruber, J., Strawczynski, L.: Subjective Effects of Variable Delay in Speech Clipping in Dynamically Managed Voice Systems. IEEE Trans-actions on Communications COM-33(8) (August 1985)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hinden, R., O’Dell, M., Deering, S.: An IPv6 Aggregatable Global Unicast Address Format, RFC 2374 (July 1998)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hinden, R., Deering, S.: IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture, RFC 1998 (1998)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Schneier, B.: Applied cryptography. Wiley, Chichester (1996) ISBN 0-471-12845-7Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Eastlake, D., Crocker, S., Schiller, J.: Randomness Recommendations for security, RFC 1750 (December 1994)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Narten, T., Draves, R.: Privacy Extensions for Stateless Address Autoconfiguration in IPv6, RFC 3041 (January 2001)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Montenegro, G., Castelluccia, C.: SUCV Identifiers and addresses, Internet draft (November 2001) (work in progress)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dommety, G.: Fast Handovers for Mobile IPv6, Internet draft (2001) (work in progress)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wasserman, M.: Recommendations for IPv6 in 3GPP Standards. Internet Draft (April 2002) (work in progress)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Perkins, C. (ed.): IP Mobility Support, IETF RFC 2002 (October 1996)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gustafsson, E., Jonsson, A., Perkins, C.: Mobile IP Regional Registration, draft- ietf- mobileip-reg-tunnel-02.txt (March 2000)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Soliman, H., et al.: Hierarchical Mobile IPv6 mobility management (HMIPv6), draft-ietf-mobileip-hmipv6-07.txtGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Valko, A.: Cellular IP – a new approach of Internet host mobility. ACM Computer Communication Reviews (January 1999)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ramjee, R., La Porta, T., Thuel, S., Varadhan, K., Wang, S.: HAWAII: a domain based approach for supporting mobility in wide.area wireless networks. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Network Protocols, ICNP 1999 (1999)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Campbell, A., Gomez, J., Wan, C.Y., Kim, S., Turanyi, Z., Valko, A.: Cellular IP, IETF draft (draft-ietf-mobileip-cellularip-00.txt) (January 2000)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Campbell, A., Gomez, J., Kim, S., Valko, A., Wan, C.-Y., Turanyi, Z.: Design, implementation and evaluation of Cellular IP. IEEE Personal Communications, 42-49 (August 2000)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Perkins, C., Wang, K.-Y.: Optimized smooth handoffs in Mobile IP. In: Proceedings of IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications, Egypt (July 1999)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    El Malki, K., et al.: Low Latency Handoffs in Mobile IPv4, IETF draft-ietf-monileip-lowlatency-handoffs-v4-04.txt (2002)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Blondia, C., Casals, O., De Cleyn, P., Willems, G.: Performance evaluation of IP micro-mobility solutions. In: Carle, G., Zitterbart, M. (eds.) PfHSN 2002. LNCS, vol. 2334, pp. 211–226. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Blondia, C., Casals, O., Cerdà, L., Willems, G.: Performance analysis of a forwarding scheme for handoff in HAWAII. In: Gregori, E., Conti, M., Campbell, A.T., Omidyar, G., Zukerman, M. (eds.) NETWORKING 2002. LNCS, vol. 2345, p. 503. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Blondia, C., Casals, O., Van den Wijngaert, N., Willems, G.: Performance analysis of smooth handoff in Mobile IP. In: Proceedings MSWiM 2002 Performance (2002)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Blondia, C., Casals, O., Cerdà, L., Van den Wijngaert, N., Willems, G., De Cleyn, P.: Comparison of Low Latency Mobile IP schemes. To appear in Proceedings WiOpt (Modeling and Optimization in Mobile, Ad Hoc and Wireless Networks) (March 2003)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Casals, O., Cerdà, L., Willems, G., Blondia, C., Van den Wijngaert, N.: Performance Evaluation of the Post-Registration Method, a Low Latency Handoff in MIPv4. To appear in Proceedings ICC 2003 (2003)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Reinbold, P., Bonaventure, O.: A Comparison of IP mobility protocols, Technical Report infonet-TR-13 (2001), http://www.infonet.fundp.ac.be
  28. 28.
    Braden, B., et al.: Recommendations on Queue Management and Congestion Avoidance in the Internet. RFC 2309 (April 1998)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Fall, K., Floyd, S.: Simulation-based Comparisons of Tahoe, Reno and SACK TCP. ACM Computer Communication Review (July 1996), ftp://ftp.ee.lbl.gov/papers/sacks.ps.Z
  30. 30.
    Floyd, S., Henderson, T.: The NewReno Modification to TCP’s Fast Recovery Algorithm. RFC 2582 (April 1999)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Floyd, S., Jacobson, V.: Random Early Detection Gateways for Congestion Avoidance. IEEE Transactions on Networking (August 1993)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Jacobson, V.: Congestion Avoidance and Control. ACM Computer Communication Review 18(4), 314–329 (1988), ftp://ftp.ee.lbl.gov/papers/congavoid.ps.Z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Mathis, M., Mahdavi, J., Floyd, S., Romanow, A.: TCP Selective Acknowledgment Options. RFC 2018 (October 1996)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Mathis, M., Mahdavi, J., Floyd, S.: Forward Acknowledgement: Refining TCP Congestion Control. ACM Computer Communication Review 26(4) (October 1996)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Montenegro, G., Dawkins, S., Kojo, M., Magret, V., Vaidya, N.: Long Thin Networks, IETF RFC 2757 (January 2000)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Stevens, W.R.: TCP/IP Illustrated: The Protocols, vol. 1. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1994)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Wright, G.R., Stevens, W.R.: TCP/IP Illustrated, the implementation, vol. 2. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1995)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Cerdà, L., Casals, O.: Study of the TCP Unfairness in a Wireless Environment. In: Proceedings of IEEE ICT 2001, Bucharest, Rumania (June 2001)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Vena, F., Cerdà, L., Casals, O.: Study of the TCP Dynamics over Wireless Networks with Micromobility Support Using the ns Simulator. In: European Wireless 2002, Florence, Italy (February 2002)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    The Network Simulator - ns-2, http://www.isi.edu/nsnam/ns
  41. 41.
    ns with micromobility support, http://comet.ctr.columbia.edu/micromobility

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chris Blondia
    • 1
  • Nik Van den Wijngaert
    • 1
  • Gert Willems
    • 1
  • Olga Casals
    • 2
  • Llorenc Cerda
    • 2
  • Marcelo Bagnulo
    • 3
  • Ignacio Soto
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Mathematics and Computer ScienceUniversity of AntwerpenAntwerpenBelgium
  2. 2.Department of Computer Architecture, Jordi GironaTechnical University of CataloniaBarcelonaSpain
  3. 3.Departamento de Ingeniera TelematicaUniversidad Carlos IIIMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations