ECDL 2003: Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries pp 101-112 | Cite as
Identifying Useful Passages in Documents Based on Annotation Patterns
Abstract
Many readers annotate passages that are important to their work. If we understand the relationship between the types of marks on a passage and the passage’s ultimate utility in a task, then we can design e-book software to facilitate access to the most important annotated parts of the documents. To investigate this hypothesis and to guide software design, we have analyzed annotations collected during an earlier study of law students reading printed case law and writing Moot Court briefs. This study has allowed us to characterize the relation-ship between the students’ annotations and the citations they use in their final written briefs. We think of annotations that relate directly to the written brief as high-value annotations; these annotations have particular, detectable characteristics. Based on this study we have designed a mark parser that analyzes freeform digital ink to identify such high-value annotations.
Keywords
Multiple Mark Annotation Type Marked Passage Annotation Pattern High EmphasisPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.Adler, A., Gujar, A., Harrison, B.L., O’Hara, K., Sellen, A.: A Diary Study of Work-Related Reading: Design Implications for Digital Reading Devices. In: Proceedings of CHI 1998, pp. 241–248. ACM Press, New York (April 1998)Google Scholar
- 2.Chiu, P., Wilcox, L.: A Dynamic Grouping Technique for Ink and Audio Notes. In: Proceedings of UIST 1998, pp. 195–202. ACM Press, New York (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Graham, J.: The Reader’s Helper: A Personalized Document Reading Environment. In: Proceedings of CHI 1999, pp. 481–488. ACM Press, New York (1999)Google Scholar
- 4.Marshall, C.C., Price, M.N., Golovchinsky, G., Schilit, B.N.: Introducing a digital library reading appliance into a reading group. In: Proceedings of ACM Digital Libraries 1999, pp. 77–84. ACM Press, New York (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Marshall, C.C., Price, M.N., Golovchinsky, G., Schilit, B.N.: Designing e-Books for Legal Research. In: Proceedings of JCDL 2001, pp. 41–49. ACM Press, New York (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.O’Hara, K., Sellen, A.: A comparison of reading paper and on-line documents. In: Proceedings of CHI 1997, pp. 335–342. ACM Press, New York (1997)Google Scholar
- 7.Phelps, T., Wilensky, R.: Multivalent Annotations. In: Proceedings of the 1997 European Conference on Digital Libraries, pp. 287–303. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)Google Scholar
- 8.Schilit, B.N., Golovchinsky, G., Price, M.N.: Beyond Paper: Supporting Active Reading with Free Form Digital Ink Annotations. In: Proceedings of CHI 1998, pp. 249–256. ACM Press, New York (1998)Google Scholar
- 9.Wolfe, J.L.: Effects of Annotations on Student Writers. In: Proceedings of ACM Digital Libraries 2000, pp. 19–26. ACM Press, New York (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar