Classification of Aerial Missions Using Hidden Markov Models

  • Maria Andersson
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 2711)

Abstract

This paper describes classification of aerial missions using first-order discrete Hidden Markov Models based on kinematic data. Civil and military aerial missions imply different motion patterns as described by the altitude, speed and direction of the aircraft. The missions are transport, private flying, reconnaissance, protection from intruders in the national airspace as well as on the ground or the sea. A procedure for creating a classification model based on HMMs for this application is discussed. An example is presented showing how the results can be used and interpreted. The analysis indicates that this model can be used for classification of aerial missions, since there are enough differences between the missions and the kinematic data can be seen as observations from unknown elements, or states, that form a specific mission.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Appriou, A.: Multisensor Data Fusion in Situation Assessment Processes. In: Nonnengart, A., Kruse, R., Ohlbach, H.J., Gabbay, D.M. (eds.) FAPR 1997 and ECSQARU 1997. LNCS, vol. 1244, Springer, Heidelberg (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aircraft (In Swedish). Gummessons, Falkoping, Sweden (1999) ISBN 91-973255-8-9 Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bharadwaj, P., Runkle, P., Carin, L., Berrie, J.A., Hughes, J.A.: Multiaspect Classification of Airborne Targets via Physics-Based HMMs and Matching Pursuits. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems 37(2), 595–606 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bjornfot, J., Svensson, P.: Modeling the Column Recognition Problem in Tactical Information Fusion. In: Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. on Information Fusion, Paris, July 10–13, pp. 24–30 (2000)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Blackman, S., Popoli, R.: Design and Analysis of Modern Tracking Systems, Artech House, Norwood, MA (1999)SBN 1-58053-006-0Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Caromicoli, A., Kurien, T.: Multitarget Identification in Airborne Surveillance. SPIE. Aerospace Pattern Recognition 1098, 161–176 (1989)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chang, K.-C., Fung, R.: Target Identification with Bayesian Networks in a Multiple Hypothesis Tracking System. Optical Engineering 36(3), 684–691 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chant, C., Taylor, M.J.H. (eds.): TheWorlds Greatest Aircraft: Specialized Aircraft. Grange Books, Kent, UK (2002) ISBN: 1 84013 467 4Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Choi, H.-I., Rhee, P.-K.: Head Gesture Recognition using HMMs. Expert Systems with Application 17, 213–221 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cho, W., Lee, S.-W., Kim, J.H.: Modeling and Recognition of Cursive Words with Hidden Markov Models. Pattern Recognition 28(12), 1941–1953 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Liander, P.: Flying Defenders – Swedish Fighters of Today (In Swedish). Gummessons, Falkoping, Sweden (1993) ISBN 91-85496-59-6Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nilubol, C., Mersereau, R.M., Smith, M.J.T.: A SAR Target Classifier Using Radon Transforms and Hidden Markov Models. Digital Signal Processing 12, 274–283 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rabiner, L.R.: A Tutorial on Hidden Markov Models and Selected Applications in Speech Recognition. In: Proc. of the IEEE, vol. 77(2), pp. 257–286 (February 1989)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Stromberg, D., Andersson, M., Lantz, F.: On Platform-Based Sensor Management. In: Proc. of the 5th Int. Conf. on Information Fusion, Vol, Annapolis, USA, pp. 600–607 (July 2002)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    de la Torre, A., Peinado, A.M., Rubio, A.J.: Discriminative Feature Weighting for HMM-Based Continuous Speech Recognizers. Speech Communications 38, 267–286 (2002)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wigren, T.: Noncooperative Target Type Identification in Multi-sensor Tracking. In: Proc. of the IRCTR Colloquium on Surveillance Sensor Tracking, Delft, June 26, pp. 1–12 (1997)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maria Andersson
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Command and Control SystemsSwedish Defence Research Agency FOILinkopingSweden

Personalised recommendations