35 Years of Testing Relativistic Gravity: Where Do We Go from Here?

  • Slava G. Turyshev
  • James G. Williams
  • Kenneth Nordtvedt Jr.
  • Michael Shao
  • Thomas W. Murphy Jr.
Part VIII Space Missions and General Relativity
First Online:
Part of the Lecture Notes in Physics book series (LNP, volume 648)

Abstract

This paper addresses the motivation, technology and recent results in the tests of the general theory of relativity in the solar system. We specifically discuss Lunar Laser Ranging (LLR), the only technique available to test the Strong Equivalence Principle (SEP) and presently the most accurate method to test for the constancy of the gravitational constant G. After almost 35 years since beginning of the experiment, LLR is poised to take a dramatic step forward by proceeding from cm to mm range accuracies enabled by the new Apache Point Observatory Lunar Laser-ranging Operation (APOLLO) currently under development in New Mexico. This facility will enable tests of the Weak and Strong Equivalence Principles with a sensitivity approaching 10–14, translating to a test of the SEP violation parameter, η, to a precision of ~ 3× 10–5. In addition, the v2/c2 general relativistic effects would be tested to better than 0.1%, and measurements of the relative change in the gravitational constant, \(\dot{G}/G\), would be ~0.1% the inverse age of the universe.

This paper also discusses a new fundamental physics experiment that will test relativistic gravity with an accuracy better than the effects of the second order in the gravitational field strength, ∝ G2. The Laser Astrometric Test Of Relativity (LATOR) will not only improve the value of the parameterized post-Newtonian (PPN) γ to unprecedented levels of accuracy of 1 part in 108, it will also be able to measure effects of the next post-Newtonian order (c–4) of light deflection resulting from gravity’s intrinsic non-linearity, as well as measure a variety of other relativistic effects. LATOR will lead to very robust advances in the tests of fundamental physics: this mission could discover a violation or extension of general relativity, or reveal the presence of an additional long range interaction in the physical law. There are no analogs to the LATOR experiment; it is unique and is a natural culmination of solar system gravity experiments.

Keywords

Dark Energy International Space Station Equivalence Principle Lunar Orbit Gravitational Physic 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1. I.I. Shapiro et al.: JGR 82 4329 (1977); R.D. Reasenberg et al.: ApJ Lett. 234 L219 (1979)Google Scholar
  2. 2. I.I. Shapiro, C.C. Counselman III, & R.W. King: Phys. Rev. Lett. 36, 555 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3. D.S. Robertson, W.E. Carter & W.H. Dillinger: Nature 349 768 (1991); D.E. Lebach et al.: Phys. Rev. Lett. 75 1439 (1995)Google Scholar
  4. 4. J.G. Williams, X.X. Newhall, & J.O. Dickey: Phys. Rev. D 53 6730 (1996)Google Scholar
  5. 5. J.O. Dickey et al: Science 265 482 (1994)Google Scholar
  6. 6. K. Nordtvedt, Jr.: Phys. Rev. 170 1168 (1968); K. Nordtvedt, Jr.: Phys. Rev. D 43 10 (1991); K. Nordtvedt, Jr.: CQG 15 3363 (1998)Google Scholar
  7. 7. J.G. Williams et al.: BAAS 33 836 (2001); J.D. Anderson et al.: BAAS 34 833 (2002)Google Scholar
  8. 8. J.D. Anderson & J.G. Williams: CQG 18 2447-2456 (2001)Google Scholar
  9. 9. L. Iess, G. Giampieri, J.D. Anderson & B. Bertotti: CQG 16 1487 (1999)Google Scholar
  10. 10. J.D. Anderson, E.L. Lau, G. Giampieri: arXiv:gr-qc/0308010Google Scholar
  11. 11. B. Bertotti, L. Iess & P. Tortora: Nature 425 374 (2003)Google Scholar
  12. 12. T. Damour & K. Nordtvedt, Jr.: Phys. Rev. Lett. 70 2217 (1993); T. Damour & K. Nordtvedt, Jr.: Phys. Rev. D 48 3436 (1993)Google Scholar
  13. 13. T. Damour, G.W. Gibbons & G. Gundlach: Phys. Rev. Lett. 64 123 (1990) T. Damour, & J.H. Taylor: Phys. Rev. D 45 1840 (1992)Google Scholar
  14. 14. T. Damour, & A.M. Polyakov: GRG 26 1171 (1994) T. Damour, & A.M. Polyakov: Nucl. Phys., B 423 532 (1994)Google Scholar
  15. 15. K. Nordtvedt, Jr.: arXiv:gr-qc/0301024Google Scholar
  16. 16. S.G. Turyshev, M. Shao & K. Nordtvedt, Jr.: ‘New Experiment to Test General Relativity: The LATOR Mission’. In: NASA Workshop on fundamental Physics (Oxnard, CA, June 2003, in press)Google Scholar
  17. 17. T.W. Murphy, Jr., et al.: ‘The Apache Point Observatory Lunar Laser-Ranging Operation (APOLLO)’. In: 12th International Workshop on Laser Ranging. (Matera, Italy, November 2000, in press, 2002)Google Scholar
  18. 18. T.W. Murphy, Jr., et al.: ‘APOLLO: Multiplexed Lunar Laser Ranging,’ In: 13th International Workshop on Laser Ranging. (Washington, D. C., USA, 2002)Google Scholar
  19. 19. K. Nordtvedt, Jr.: Phys. Rev. 169 1014 (1968); Phys. Rev., 169 1017 (1968)Google Scholar
  20. 20. C.M. Will & K. Nordtvedt, Jr.: ApJ 177 757 (1972)Google Scholar
  21. 21. C.M. Will: Theory and Experiment in Gravitational Physics. (Cambridge, 1993)Google Scholar
  22. 22. K. Nordtvedt, Jr.: CQG 13 A11 (1996); K. Nordtvedt Jr.: Icarus 114 51 (1995)Google Scholar
  23. 23. C.M. Will: “General Relativity at 75: How Right was Einstein?” Science 250 770 (1990); C.M. Will: The Confrontation between General Relativity and Experiment, (2001) [arXiv:grqc/0103036]Google Scholar
  24. 24. P.L. Bender et al.: Science 182 229 (1973)Google Scholar
  25. 25. E.V. Pitjeva: Celest. Mech. & Dyn. Astr. 55 313 (1993)Google Scholar
  26. 26. P. de Bernardis et al.: Nature 404 955 (2000)Google Scholar
  27. 27. J.A. Peacock et al.: Nature 410 169(2001)Google Scholar
  28. 28. S. Perlmutter et al.: ApJ 517 565 (1999)Google Scholar
  29. 29. A. Riess et al.: ApJ 116 1009 (1998)Google Scholar
  30. 30. M.T. Murphy et al.: MNRAS 327 1208 (2001); T. Banks, M. Dine, M.R. Douglas: Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 131301 (2002)Google Scholar
  31. 31. E.G. Adelberger: CQG 18 2397 (2001)Google Scholar
  32. 32. S. Baessler: Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 3585 (1999)Google Scholar
  33. 33. J.L. Tonry et al.: arXiv:astro-ph/0305008Google Scholar
  34. 34. C.L. Bennett et al.: arXiv:astro-ph/0302207Google Scholar
  35. 35. N.W. Halverson et al.: ApJ 568 38 (2002); C.B. Netterfield et al.:ApJ 571 604 (2002)Google Scholar
  36. 36. S.M. Carroll: Living Rev. Rel. 4 1 (2001); P.J. Peebles & B. Ratra: Rev. Mod. Ph. 75 599 (2003)Google Scholar
  37. 37. S.M. Carroll et al.: arXiv:astro-ph/0306438; S.M. Carroll, M. Hoffman, & M. Trodden: arXiv:astro-ph/0301273; G. Dvali & M.S. Turner: arXiv:astro-ph/0301510; K. Freese, & M. Lewis: Phys. Lett. B 540 1 (2002)Google Scholar
  38. 38. J.G. Williams et al.: ‘Lunar Laser Tests of Gravitational Physics’. In: Ninth Marcel Grossmann Meeting. (World Scientific Publ., eds. V. G. Gurzadyan, R. T. Jantzen, and R. Ruffini, 2002) p. 1797Google Scholar
  39. 39. W.J. Marciano: Phys. Rev. Lett. 52 489 (1984)Google Scholar
  40. 40. T. Goldman et al.: Phys. Lett. B 281 219 (1992)Google Scholar
  41. 41. O. Bertolami, J.M. Mouráo, J. Pérez-Mercader: Phys. Lett. B 311 27 (1993)Google Scholar
  42. 42. K. Nordtvedt, Jr.: CQG 16 A101 (1999)Google Scholar
  43. 43. J. G. Williams & J.O. Dickey: ‘Lunar Geophysics, Geodesy, and Dynamics’. In: 13th International Workshop on Laser Ranging, October 7-11, 2002, Washington, D. C., available at http://cddisa.gsfc.nasa.gov/lw13/lw-proceedings.htmlGoogle Scholar
  44. 44. J. Müller & K. Nordtvedt, Jr.: Phys. Rev. D 58 200 (1998)Google Scholar
  45. 45. K. Nordtvedt, Jr., J. Muller & M. Soffel: A&A 293 L73 (1995)Google Scholar
  46. 46. T. Damour & D. Vokrouhlicky: Phys. Rev. D 53 4177 (1996); T. Damour & D. Vokrouhlicky: Phys. Rev. 53 6740 (1996)Google Scholar
  47. 47. J.G. Williams et al.: Phys. Rev. Lett. 36 551 (1976)Google Scholar
  48. 48. J. Müller, K. Nordtvedt, Jr., & D. Vokrouhlicky: Phys. Rev. D 54 R5927 (1996)Google Scholar
  49. 49. K. Nordtvedt, Jr.: ApJ 437 529 (1994)Google Scholar
  50. 50. J. Müller et al.: ‘Determination of Relativistic Quantities by Analyzing Lunar Laser Ranging Data’. In: Seventh Marcel Grossmann Meeting. (World Scientific Publ., eds. R. T. Jantzen, G. M. Keiser, and R. Ruffini, 1996) p. 1517Google Scholar
  51. 51. R. Epstein & I. I. Shapiro, Phys. Rev. D 22 2947 (1980)Google Scholar
  52. 52. E. Fishbach & B.S. Freeman: Phys. Rev. D 22 2950 (1980)Google Scholar
  53. 53. G.W. Richter & R.A. Matzner: Phys. Rev. D 26, 1219 (1982); G.W. Richter & R.A. Matzner: Phys. Rev. D 26, 2549 (1982); Richter, G. W. & Matzner, R. A., Phys. Rev. D 28, 3007 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54. K. Nordtvedt, Jr.: ApJ 320 871 (1987)Google Scholar
  55. 55. A. Gerber et al.: “LATOR 2003 Mission Analysis,” JPL Advanced Project Design Team (Team X) Report #X-618 (2003)Google Scholar

Authors and Affiliations

  • Slava G. Turyshev
    • 1
  • James G. Williams
    • 1
  • Kenneth Nordtvedt Jr.
    • 2
  • Michael Shao
    • 1
  • Thomas W. Murphy Jr.
    • 3
  1. 1.Jet Propulsion Laboratory, 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, CA 91109USA
  2. 2.Northwest Analysis, 118 Sourdough Ridge Road, Bozeman, MT 59715USA
  3. 3.Physics Department, University of California, San Diego, CASS-0424, 9500 Gilman Dr., La Jolla, CA 92093USA

Personalised recommendations