Performance Evaluation of Live Video Streaming Service in 802.11b WLAN Environment under Different Load Conditions

  • Yevgeni Koucheryavy
  • Dmitri Moltchanov
  • Jarmo Harju
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 2899)


Live video streaming service, which is common nowadays in the Internet, is supposed to be very challenging and demanding service in next-generation wireless networks. However, both limited quality of service (QoS) support and unstable quality of the air interface can restrain its wide deployment. In this paper we consider live video streaming over IEEE 802.11b wireless local area network (WLAN), which is claimed to be used as a part of layered infrastructure of next-generation mobile systems to provide coverage in highly populated areas. We performed our experiments under different signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) and different competing TCP and UDP traffic volumes. The main conclusion of our study is that despite a common belief live streaming multimedia services are not ready for wide implementation in hot-spot areas where both high traffic volume and relatively weak signal strength (less than 30 dB) may deny the service easily.


Mobile Node Wireless Local Area Network Round Trip Time Streaming Service Live Streaming 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Droma, M., Ganchev, I., Morabito, G., Narcisi, R., Passas, N., Paskalis, S., Frid-erikos, V., Jahan, A., Tsontsis, E., Bader, C., Rotrou, J., Chaouchi, H.: Always best connected enabled 4G wireless world. In: 1ST Mobile and Wireless Communications Summit (2003)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fitzek, F., Kopsel, A., Krishnam, M., Reisslein, M.: Providing application-level QoS in 3G/4G wireless systems: A comprehensive framework based on multi-rate CDMA. IEEE Wireless Communications 9(2), 42–47 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Leijonhufvud, G.: Multi access networks and always best connected (ABC). In: Proc. of MMC workshop, Berlin, Germany (November 2001)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    National science foundation workshop on network research testbeds. NSF (2002) (final report), Available at:,
  5. 5.
    Kuang, T., Williamson, C.: A measurement study of realmedia audio/video streaming traffic. In: Proceedings of SPIE ITCOM, Boston, USA, July 2002, pp. 68–79 (2002)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Koucheryavy, Y., Moltchanov, D., Jarmo, H.: Impact of mobility on entertainment services’ performance in heterogeneous wireless environment. Submitted to ATNAC 2003, Melbourne, Australia (December 2003)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Helix server, Available at:
  8. 8.
    NLANR. Network performance and measurements tools, Available at:
  9. 9.
    Etherial software, Available at:
  10. 10.
    Kurose, J., Ross, K.: Computer networking: A top-down approach featuring the Internet, 2nd edn. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2003)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yevgeni Koucheryavy
    • 1
  • Dmitri Moltchanov
    • 1
  • Jarmo Harju
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Communication EngineeringTampere University of TechnologyTampereFinland

Personalised recommendations