Anatomically Guided Registration of Whole Body Mouse MR Images

  • N. Kovacevic
  • G. Hamarneh
  • M. Henkelman
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 2879)


A new methodology for three-dimensional (3D) non-linear registration of articulate objects is presented. This approach is described in the context of a program to screen for mutant mouse phenotypes based on high resolution MR images of whole animals. The screening process requires statistical definition of the normal (non-mutant) mouse anatomy and its variation. The registration algorithm is designed to remove postural differences between mice and thus enable meaningful comparisons between images. The main focus of our approach is anatomical content and its preservation under deformations. Prior knowledge guides the registration through an evolutionary process based on a hierarchical tree of mouse anatomy.


Reference Image Sample Image Registration Algorithm Single Label Gaussian Blur 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Toga, A.W. (ed.): BrainWarping. Academic Press, San Diego (1999)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bookstein, F.L.: Principal warps:thin-plate splines and the decomposition of deformations. IEEE Trans. on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 11(6), 567–585 (1989)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Collins, D.L., Evans, A.C.: Animal:ValidationAndApplications Of Non-Linear Registration-Based Segmentation. International Journal and Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence 11, 1271–1294 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hajnal, J., Hawkes, D., Hill, D. (eds.): Medical Image Registration. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2001)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Thompson, P.M., Toga, A.W.: A Framework For Computational Anatomy. Comput. Visual. Sci. 5, 13–34 (2002)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Woods, R.P., Grafton, S.T., Holmes, C.J., Cherry, S.R., Mazziotta, J.C.: Automated Image Registration: I. General Methods and Intrasubject, Intramodality Validation. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography 22, 139–152 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Johnson, J.A., Cofer, G.P., Gewalt, S.L., Hedlund, L.W.: Morphologic Phenotyping With MR Microscopy: The Visible Mouse. Radiology 222(3), 789–793 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. Kovacevic
    • 1
  • G. Hamarneh
    • 1
  • M. Henkelman
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Mouse Imaging CentreHospital for Sick ChildrenTorontoCanada
  2. 2.University of TorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations