Advertisement

Semantic Web Enabled Web Services: State-of-Art and Industrial Challenges

  • Vagan Terziyan
  • Oleksandr Kononenko
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 2853)

Abstract

Semantic Web technology has a vision to define and link Web data in a way that it can be understood and used by machines for automation, integration and reuse of data across various applications. Ontological definition of every resource as it is assumed in Semantic Web, along with new techniques for semantics processing and new vision Intelligent Web Services is expected to bring Web on its new level. At present, Web Services technology is stressed by the search of a right way for further development. Combination of Semantic Web and Web Services concepts may address many of difficulties of existing technology. It is not a question of whether Semantic Web is coming or not, but a question of when it will come. However without mature standards, proof and actually working industrial cases Semantic Web has small chances to be adopted by industry. In this paper a survey of Web Services recent needs is made, state of the art of Semantic Web technology is discussed in the context of industrial applications. Some new challenges brought by Semantic Web were observed and the industrial maintenance case related to some of these challenges was considered.

Keywords

Resource Description Framework Service Composition Service Discovery Service Description Predictive Maintenance 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Ankolekar, A., Burstein, M., Hobbs, J.R., Lassila, O., Martin, D.L., McDermott, D., McIlraith, S.A., Narayanan, S., Paolucci, M., Payne, T.R., Sycara, K.: DAML-S: Web Service Description for the Semantic WebGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., Lassila, O.: The Semantic Web. Scientific American, Singapore (May 2001)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bussler, C., Fensel, D., Franzens, L.: Semantic Web Services and Their Role in Enterprise Application Integration and E-Commerce. Special Issue of the International Journal of Electronic Commerce, IJEC (2003)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Connolly, D., van Harmelen, F., Horrocks, I., McGuinness, D.L., Patel-Schneider, P.F., Stein, L.A.: DAML+OIL (March 2001) Reference Description, W3C Note, December 18 (2001)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dean, M., Connolly, D., van Harmelen, F., Hendler, J., Horrocks, I., McGuinness, D.L., Patel-Schneider, P.F., Stein, L.A. (eds.): Web Ontology Language (OWL) Reference Version 1.0, November 12 (2002), This W3C Working Draft is available at, http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-owl-ref-20021112/
  6. 6.
    Fensel, D., Bussler, C.: The Web Service Modeling Framework WSMF. In: White Paper and Internal Report Vrije Unversiteit Amsterdam (2002), Available at www.cs.vu.nl/ swws/download/wsmf.paper.pdfGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fensel, D., Bussler, C., Maedche, A.: Semantic Web Enabled Web Services. In: Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference 2002. LNCS, pp. 1–2. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fensel, D., Bussler, C., Ding, Y., Kartseva, V., Klein, M., Korotkiy, M., Omelayenko, B., Siebes, R.: Semantic Web Application Areas. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Workshop on Applications of Natural Language to Information Systems, Stockholm - Sweden, June 27-28 (2002)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fensel, D., Musen, M.A.: The Semantic Web: A Brain for Humankind. In: Intelligent Systems. IEEE, Los Alamitos (March/April 2001)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mitra, N. (ed.): SOAP: Version 1.2, W3C Recommendation, May 7 (2003), URL: http://www.w3.org/TR/soap12-part0/
  11. 11.
    Newcomer, E.: Introducing Web Services, May 31. Addison Wesley, Reading (2002), URL: http://www.iona.com/devcenter/NEWCOMER.ch01.qk.pdf Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ohlms, C.: A Perspective on the Market Adoption of Semantic Web Technologies. In: Proceedings of AIK-Symposium (2002)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Paolucci, M., Kawamura, T., Payne, T.R., Sycara, K.: Importing the Semantic Web in UDDI. In: Proceedings of Web Services, Ebusiness and Semantic Web Workshop (2001)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sankar, K., Liu, K., Booth, D. (eds.): Web Services Description (WSDL) Version 1.2: Primer, World Wide Web Consortium, March 3 (2003), The editors’ version of the Web Services Description Version 1.2: URL: http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/
  15. 15.
    Sirin, E., Hendler, J., Parsia, B.: Semi-Automatic Composition of Web Services Using Semantic Descriptions. In: Web Services: Modeling, Architecture and Infrastructure workshop in conjunction with ICEIS2003 (2002) (accepted to)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sliwa, C.: From e-Speak to Web Services, Computerworld, December 2 (2002), URL: http://www.computerworld.com/developmenttopics/development/webservices/story/0,10801,76207,00.html
  17. 17.
    Sollazzo, T., Handschuh, S., Staab, S., Frank, M.: Semantic Web Service Architecture – Evolving Web Service Standards toward the Semantic Web. In: Proceedings of the 15th International FLAIRS Conference, Pensacola, Florida, May 16-18. AAAI Press, Menlo Park (2002)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sycara, K.: Autonomous Semantic Web Services. In: Proceedings of the 15th Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering, Velden, Austria (2003), http://www-2.cs.cmu.edu/~softagents/presentations/parisseminarcolor.pdf
  19. 19.
    Trastour, D., Bartolini, C., Gonzalez-Castillo, J.: A Semantic Web Approach to Service Description for Matchmaking of Services. In: Proc. International Semantic Web Working Symposium (SWWS), Stanford, CA, USA (July 2001)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    UDDI: The UDDI technical white paper (2000), URL: http://www.uddi.org/

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vagan Terziyan
    • 1
  • Oleksandr Kononenko
    • 1
  1. 1.Industrial Ontologies Group, MIT DepartmentUniversity of JyvaskylaJyvaskylaFinland

Personalised recommendations