Distributed Intelligent Management of Active Networks

  • G. Di Fatta
  • S. Gaglio
  • G. Lo Presti
  • G. Lo Re
  • I. Selvaggio
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 2829)

Abstract

This paper focuses on improving computer network management by the adoption of artificial intelligence techniques. A logical inference system has being devised to enable automated isolation, diagnosis, and even repair of network problems, thus enhancing the reliability, performance, and security of networks. We propose a distributed multi-agent architecture for network management, where a logical reasoner acts as an external managing entity capable of directing, coordinating, and stimulating actions in an active management architecture. The active networks technology represents the lower level layer which makes possible the deployment of code which implement teleo-reactive agents, distributed across the whole network. We adopt the Situation Calculus to define a network model and the Reactive Golog language to implement the logical reasoner. An active network management architecture is used by the reasoner to inject and execute operational tasks in the network. The integrated system collects the advantages coming from logical reasoning and network programmability, and provides a powerful system capable of performing high-level management tasks in order to deal with network fault situations.

Keywords

Distributed Intelligent Systems Automated Reasoning Situation Calculus Network Management 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Al Shaer, E.: Active Management Framework for Distributed Multimedia Systems. Journal of Networks and Systems Management 8(1), 49–72 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barone, A., Chirco, P., Di Fatta, G., Lo Re, G.: A Management Architecture For Active Networks. In: Proc. of IEEE Workshop on Active Middleware Services, Edinburgh, UK (July 2002)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Covo, A.A., Moruzzi, T.M., Peterson, E.D.: AI-assisted Telecommunications Network Management. In: IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference (GLOBECOM 1989), Dallas, TX, USA, November 1989, pp. 487–496 (1989)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cebulka, K.D., Muller, M.J., Riley, C.A.: Applications of artificial intelligence for meeting network management challenges of the 1990s. In: IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference (GLOBECOM 1989), Dallas, TX, USA, November 1989, pp. 501–506 (1989)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kawamura, R., Stadler, R.: Active Distributed Management for IP Networks. IEEE Communications Magazine 38(4), 114–121 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kerschberg, L., Baum, R., Waisanen, A., Huang, I., Yoon, J.: Managing Faults in Telecommunications Networks: A Taxonomy to Knowledge-Based Approaches, pp. 779–784. IEEE, Los Alamitos (1991)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hick, M., et al.: PLAN: A Packet Language for Active Networks. In: Proc. of 3rd ACM SIGPLAN International Conference on Functional Programming, pp. 86–93. ACM, New York (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mazumdar, S., Lazar, A.: Objective-Driven Monitoring for Broadband Networks. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 8(3), 391–402 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    McCarthy, J.: Situations, actions and causal laws, Technical Report Stanford University, Reprinted in Semantic Information Processing (M. Minsky ed.). MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, pp. 410-417 (1963)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mills, D.L.: On the accuracy of Clocks Synchronized by the Network Time Protocol in the Internet System. ACM Computer Communication Review 20(1), 65–75 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nilson, N.J.: Intelligenza Artificiale, Apogeo (2002)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lakshmi, R.: OSI Systems and Network Management. IEEE Communications Magazine 36(3), 46–53 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Raymond, R.: Knowledge in action: Logical Foundations for specifying and implementing Dynamical Systems. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2001)MATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sidor, D.J.: TMN standards: Satisfying Todays Need While Preparing for Tomorrow. IEEE Communications Magazine 36(3), 54–64 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Stallings, W.: SNMP and SNMPv2: The Infrastructure for Network Management. IEEE Communicatiions Magazine 36(3), 37–45 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tennenhouse, D.L., Smith, J.M., Sincoskie, W.D., Wetherall, D.J., Minde, G.J.: A Survey of Active Network Research. IEEE Communications Magazine 35(1), 8 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tennenhouse, D.L., Wetherall, D.J.: Towards an Active Network Architecture. Computer Communication Review 26(2) (April 1996)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Di Fatta
    • 1
  • S. Gaglio
    • 1
  • G. Lo Presti
    • 1
  • G. Lo Re
    • 1
  • I. Selvaggio
    • 1
  1. 1.ICAR, Istituto di Calcolo e Reti ad Alte Prestazioni, C.N.R.Universita’ degli Studi di PalermoPalermoItaly

Personalised recommendations