COW, a Flexible Platform for the Enactment of Learning Scenarios

  • Thomas Vantroys
  • Yvan Peter
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 2806)

Abstract

Open and Distance Learning platforms are more than systemis delivering pedagogical resources. They require mechanisms for the enactment and coordination of pedagogical modules and learning activities. A common solution to express learning paths in learning management systems (LMS) can be the use of Educational Modelling Languages (EML). The next step will be the enactment of these models. For that purpose, workflow management systems can be used. These systems formerly reserved for highly structured procedures can be used in dynamic and reactive environments such as virtual campuses platforms, thanks to an enhanced flexibility in the execution of models and in the management of exceptions. In this article we shall present COW our flexible workflow engine dedicated to open and distant learning. We will compare EML and workflow approach and see how to pass from a pedagogical modelisation to a workflow modelisation. We shall see how it is possible to organize the pedagogical modules and the learning paths to answer the expectation within the framework of individual courses (lifelong learning orientation) or within the framework of group courses (closer to the traditional face to face learning).

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    OMG Model Driven Architecture, http://www.omg.org/mda
  2. 2.
    Object Management Group, http://www.omg.org
  3. 3.
    Rodriguez-Artacho, M.: PALO Language Overview, technical report LSI Dept/TR-2002-01, Universidad Nacional de Educatión a Distancia (January 2002), http://sensei.lsi.uned.es/palo/PALO-TR.pdf
  4. 4.
    Educational Modelling Language. Open University of Nederland, http://eml.ou.nl
  5. 5.
    Brickley, D.: Towards an open question-interchange framework, University of Bristol, http://www.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/netquest/about/lang/motivation.html
  6. 6.
    CEN/ISSS WS/LT Learning Technologies Workshop. Survey of Educational Modelling Languages (EMLs), version 1, September 19 (2002)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    IMS Global Learning Consortium. IMS Learning Design Information Model, version 1.0 Final Specification, January 20 (2003), http://www.imsproject.org/learningdesign/index.cfm
  8. 8.
    IMS Global Learning Consortium. IMS Question & Test Interoperability: An Overview, version 1.2, February 11 (2002), http://www.imsproject.org/question/index.cfm
  9. 9.
    Bourguin, G., Derycke, A., Tarby, J.-C.: Beyond the Interface: Co-evolution Inside Interactive Systems – A Proposal Founded on Activity Theory. In: Proceeding of IHM-HCI 2001, Lille, France (September 2001)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Vantroys, T., Peter, Y.: Un système de workflows flexible pour la formation ouverte et à distance. In: Proceedings of TICE2002 (November 2002), http://tice2002.insa-lyon.fr
  11. 11.
    Lin, J., Ho, C., Sadiq, W., Orlowska, M.E.: On Workflow Enabled e-Learning Services. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, ICALT 2001, Madison, USA, August 6-8 (2001)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Distributed Systems Technology Centre, http://www.dstc.edu.au
  13. 13.
    Workflow Management Coalition. Workflow Process Definition Interface – XML Process Definition Language, WfMC-TC-1025, version 1.0, October 25 (2002), http://www.wfmc.org/standards/docs/TC-1025_10_xpdl_102502.pdf
  14. 14.
    Workflow Management Coalition. The Workflow Reference Model, WfMC-TC- 1003, Version 1.1, January 19 (1995), http://www.wfmc.org/
  15. 15.
    Object Management group. Workflow Management Facility, Version 1.2 (2000), http://www.omg.org/technology/documents/formal/workflow_management.htm
  16. 16.
    Kiczales, G.: Jim des Rivières et Daniel G. Bobrow – The Art of the Metaobject Protocol. MIT Press, Cambridge (1991) ISBN : 0-26-261074-4Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bourguin, G.: Un support informatique à l’activité coopérative fondé sur la Théorie de l’activité: le projet DARE, Ph’D Thesis, Université des Sciences et Technologies de Lille, July 13, Lille, France (2000)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Viéville, C.: Learning Activities in a Virtual Campus. In: Hazemi, R., Hailes, S. (eds.) The Digital University – Building a learning Community, Ch. 15, pp. 215–227. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Archimed, S.A.: http://www.Archimed.fr
  20. 20.
    DeMichiel, L.G., Yalçinalp, L.Ü., Krishnan, S.: Enterprise JavaBeansTM Specification, version 2.0, Sun Microsystems, Inc. (2001)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    W3C. XML Protocol specification, http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/
  22. 22.
    W3C. Web Services Description Language (WSDL) 1.1, http://www.w3.org/TR/wsdl
  23. 23.
    Vantroys, T., Rouillard, J.: Workflow and Mobile Devices in Open Distance Learning. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies ICALT 2002, Kazan, Tatarstan, Septembre 9-12 (2002), http://lttf.ieee.org/icalt2002/

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas Vantroys
    • 1
    • 2
  • Yvan Peter
    • 1
  1. 1.TRIGONE Laboratory, NOCE TeamVilleneuve d’AscqFrance
  2. 2.Archimed SALilleFrance

Personalised recommendations