Perceived Value: A Low-Cost Approach to Evaluate Meetingware

  • Pedro Antunes
  • Carlos J. Costa
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 2806)


Meetingware supports, manages, guides and stimulates participation in meetings. The evaluation of meetingware has not yet produced concluding results due to many reasons, one of them concerning the high cost (in time, money and logistics) of the evaluation process. This paper proposes a low-cost approach to evaluate meetingware. The approach is centered on a variable – Perceived Value – measuring several external product attributes of meetingware that can be negotiated between developers and users. The proposed approach was used by an organization with the purpose of evaluating a meetingware prototype developed by the authors.


Quality Function Deployment Software Product Line Organizational Memory Group Memory Organizational Role 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Aiken, M., Vanjani, M.: An automated GDSS facilitator. In: 28th Annual Conference of the Southwest Decision Sciences Institute, Dallas, Texas (1998)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Araujo, R., Santoro, F., Borges, M.: The CSCW lab for groupware evaluation. In: Haake, J.M., Pino, J.A. (eds.) CRIWG 2002. LNCS, vol. 2440, p. 222. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Baeza-Yates, R., Pino, J.: A first step to formally evaluate collaborative work. In: Proceedings of the International ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work, Phoenix, Arizona (1997)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Baker, K., Greenberg, S., Gutwin, C.: Empirical development of a heuristic evaluation methodology for shared workspace groupware. In: Proceedings of the 2002 ACM conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, New Orleans (2002)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Beyer, H., Holtzblatt, K.: Contextual Design: Defining Customer-Centered Systems. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1998)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bostrom, R., Aiken, M., Motiwalla, L., Sheng, O., Nunamaker, J.: ESP: An expert system for pre-session group decision support systems planning. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Third Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences, Kailua-Kona, Hawaii, pp. 279–286 (1990)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Briggs, B., Nunamaker, J., Tobey, D.: The technology transition model: A key to selfsustaining and growing communities of GSS users. In: Proceedings of the 34th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii (2001)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Briggs, R., Adkins, M., Mittleman, D., Kruse, J., Miller, S., Nunamaker, J.: A technology transition model derived from field investigation of GSS use aboard the USS Coronado. Journal of Management Information Systems 15(3) (1999)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Briggs, R., Vreede, G.: ThinkLets: Achieving predictable, repeatable, patterns of group interaction with group support systems (GSS). In: Proceedings of the 34th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (2001)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chiasson, M., Lovato, C.: Factors influencing the formation of a user’s perceptions and use of a DSS software innovation. The DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems 32(3), 16–35 (2001)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Collazos, C., Guerrero, L., Pino, J., Ochoa, S.: Evaluating collaborative learning processes. In: Haake, J.M., Pino, J.A. (eds.) CRIWG 2002. LNCS, vol. 2440, p. 203. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Conklin, E.: Capturing organizational memory. In: Proceedings of GroupWare 1992, California, pp. 133–137 (1992)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Costa, C., Antunes, P.: Handheld CSCW in the meeting environment. In: Haake, J.M., Pino, J.A. (eds.) CRIWG 2002. LNCS, vol. 2440, pp. 47–60. Springer, Heidelberg (2002) ISBN: 3-540-44112-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    DeBaud, J., Schmid, K.: A systematic approach to derive the scope of software product lines. In: Proceedings of the 21st international conference on Software engineering, Los Angeles (1999)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dennis, A., Nunamaker, J., Vogel, D.: A comparison of laboratory and field research in the study of electronic meeting systems. Journal of Management Information Systems 7(3), 107–135 (1991)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    DeSanctis, G., Snyder, J., Poole, M.: The meaning of the interface: A functional and holistic evaluation of a meeting software system. Decision Support Systems 11, 319–335 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fjermestad, J., Hiltz, S.: An assessment of group support systems experimental research: Methodology and results. Journal of Management Information Systems 15(3), 7–149 (1999)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Grudin, J.: Groupware and social dynamics: Eight challenges for developers. Communications of the ACM 37(1), 92–105 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hollingshead, A., McGrath, J.: Computer-assisted groups: A critical review of the empirical research. In: Guzzo, R., Salas, E. (eds.) Team Effectiveness and Decision Making in Organizations, Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco (1995)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hughes, J., King, V., Rodden, T., Andersen, H.: Moving out from the control room: ethnography in system design. In: Proceedings of CSCW 1994, pp. 429–439 (1994)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    McGrath, J.: Groups: Interaction and performance. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1984)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Millen, D., Fontaine, M., Muller, M.: Understanding the benefits and costs of communities of practice. Communications of the ACM 45(4), 69–73 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Munkvold, B., Anson, R.: Organizational Adoption and Diffusion of Electronic Meeting Systems: A Case Study. In: Proceedings of the 2001 International ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work, Boulder, Colorado, pp. 279–287 (2001)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Nunamaker, J., Dennis, A., Valacich, J., Vogel, D., George, J.: Electronic meeting systems to support group work: Theory and practice at Arizona. Communications of the ACM 34(7), 40–61 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Nunamaker, J., Vogel, D., Heminger, A., Martz, B.: Experiences at IBM with group support systems: A field study. Decision Support Systems 5, 183–196 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Orlikowski, W., Gash, D.: Technological frames: making sense of information technology in organizations. ACM Transactions on Information Systems 12(2), 174–207 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ovaska, S.: Lots of data, lots of evaluation – lots of findings? SIGGROUP Bulletin 20(2), 33–35 (1999)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Pervan, G.: The measurement of GSS effectiveness: A meta-analysis of the literature and recommendations for future GSS research. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences, Hawaii (1994)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Pidd, M.: Tools for Thinking. Wiley, Chichester (1996)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Pinelle, D., Gutwin, C.: A review of groupware evaluations. In: Proceedings of 9th IEEE WETICE Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises (2000)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Pinsonneault, A., Kraemer, K.: The impact of technological support on groups: An assessment of the empirical research. Decision Support Systems 5(3), 197–216 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Pressman, R.: Software Engineering a Practitioner’s Approach, Trans. European Adaptation, 5th edn. McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York (2000)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Romano, N., Nunamaker, J.: Meeting analysis: Findings from research and practice. In: Proceeding of the 34th Hawaii International Conference on Systems Science, Hawaii (2001)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Stylianou, A., Kumar, R., Khouja, M.: A total quality management-based systems development process. The DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems 28(3), 59–71 (1997)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    The 3M Meeting Management Team, Mastering Meetings. McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York (1994)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Tung, L., Turban, E.: A proposed framework for distributed group support systems. Decision Support Systems 23, 175–188 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Vicente, K.: HCI in the global knowledge-based economy: Designing to support worker adaptation. In: Carrol, J. (ed.) Human Computer Interaction in the New Millennium. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2002)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Yin, R.: Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Sage, Thousand Oaks (1994)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Zigurs, I.: Methodological and measurement issues in group support systems research. In: Jessup, L., Valacich, J. (eds.) Group Support Systems: New Perspectives, pp. 112–122. Macmillan, Basingstoke (1993)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pedro Antunes
    • 1
  • Carlos J. Costa
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of InformaticsFaculty of Sciences of the University of LisboaLisboaPortugal
  2. 2.Departamento de Ciências e Tecnologias de InformaçãoISCTELisboaPortugal

Personalised recommendations