Computing Refined Buneman Trees in Cubic Time
Reconstructing the evolutionary tree for a set of n species based on pairwise distances between the species is a fundamental problem in bioinformatics. Neighbor joining is a popular distance based tree reconstruction method. It always proposes fully resolved binary trees despite missing evidence in the underlying distance data. Distance based methods based on the theory of Buneman trees and refined Buneman trees avoid this problem by only proposing evolutionary trees whose edges satisfy a number of constraints. These trees might not be fully resolved but there is strong combinatorial evidence for each proposed edge. The currently best algorithm for computing the refined Buneman tree from a given distance measure has a running time of O(n 5) and a space consumption of O(n 4). In this paper, we present an algorithm with running time O(n 3) and space consumption O(n 2). The improved complexity of our algorithm makes the method of refined Buneman trees computational competitive to methods based on neighbor joining.
KeywordsBinary Tree Evolutionary Tree Dissimilarity Measure Space Usage Central Edge
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 3.Berry, V., Bryant, D.: Faster reliable phylogenetic analysis. In: Proc. 3rd International Conference on Computational Molecular Biology (RECOMB), pp. 69–69 (1999)Google Scholar
- 7.Buneman, P.: The recovery of trees from measures of dissimilarity. In: Hodson, F., Kendall, D., Tautu, P. (eds.) Mathematics in Archaeological and Historical Sciences, pp. 387–395. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh (1971)Google Scholar
- 10.Huson, D.: Splitstree: a program for analyzing and visualizing evolutionary data. Bioinformatics 14(1), 68–73 (1998), http://www-ab.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de/software/splits/welcome_en.html CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Nei, M., Kumar, S.: Molecular Evolution and Phylogenetics. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2000)Google Scholar
- 14.Saitou, N., Nei, M.: The neighbor-joining method: A new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Molecular Biology Evolution 4, 406–425 (1987)Google Scholar