Mapping of Field-Aligned Current Patterns during Northward IMF

  • Peter Stauning
  • Freddy Christiansen
  • Jürgen Watermann
  • Tina Christensen
  • Ole Rasmussen

Summary

Magsat and Ørsted high-precision magnetic measurements have been combined to provide detailed and consistent mapping of ionospheric field-aligned current (FAC) patterns during intervals of northward interplanetary magnetic field (NBZ) conditions. The satellite observations indicate that the NBZ FAC currents extend from two rounded ionospheric regions centered at 85° geomagnetic latitude and magnetic local times of approximately 0900 for the upward and 1500 for the downward FAC. The analysis has revealed that the locations of the NBZ FAC regions are almost invariant to seasonal variations and to variations in the magnitude of IMF B z . The NBZ FAC currents are sizeable for summer conditions only; they almost vanish during equinox and winter seasons. The NBZ FAC intensity is a strongly non-linear function of IMF B z rising strongly above a marked threshold at around +5 nT. The observations support experiences from polar magnetometer observations, among other from Greenland, on the gradual development of high-latitude convection changes following IMF changes.

Key words

Magnetosphere ionosphere field-aligned currents convection polar cap NBZ conditions 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Akima H (1978) A method for bivariate interpolation and smooth surface fitting for irregularly distributed data points, Assoc Comput Trans Math Software, 4 (2), 148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Araki T, Kamei T, and Iyemori T (1984) Polar cap vertical currents associated with northward interplanetary magnetic field, Geophys Res Lett, 11, 23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Langel RJ (1987) The Main Field, in: Jacobs JA (ed), Geomagnetism, Vol 1, Ch4, Academic Press.Google Scholar
  4. Neubert T et al (2001), Ørsted satellite captures high-precision geomagnetic field data, EOS, 82 (7), 81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Newell PT, Meng C-I, Sibeck DG, and Lepping R (1989) Some low-altitude cusp dependencies on the interplanetary magnetic field, J Geophys Res, 94, 8921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Olsen N et al (2000) Oersted Initial Field Model, Geophys Res Lett, 27, 3607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Potemra T (1994) Sources of large-scale Birkeland currents, in: Holtet JA and Egeland A (eds), Physical Signatures of Magnetospheric Boundary Layer Processes, p3, Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  8. Weimer DR (2001) Maps of ionospheric field-aligned currents as a function of interplanetary magnetic field derived from Dynamics Explorer 2 data, J Geophys Res, 106, 12,889.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter Stauning
    • 1
  • Freddy Christiansen
    • 1
  • Jürgen Watermann
    • 1
  • Tina Christensen
    • 1
  • Ole Rasmussen
    • 1
  1. 1.Danish Meteorological InstituteCopenhagenDenmark

Personalised recommendations