Abstract
In chapter 4, we have explained why nuclear cross-sections, in the domain where the density of compound states is high, are very rapidly varying functions of energy. This led us to consider energy-averaged cross-sections, with the averaging interval I subject to the conditions (4.2.4), and to the decompositions (4.1.11) and (4.2.5) of the average cross-section into a shape-elastic or direct part, and into a compound-nucleus contribution. These two parts can be viewed as representing the fast and the slow contributions, respectively, to the average cross-section, as explained in the paragraph following eq. (4.1.14). This interpretation leads to the expectation that the shape-elastic or direct part can be described by simple models involving only a few degrees of freedom. The most important of these models were described in chapters 5 and 7. We now turn to the evaluation of the compound-nucleus contributions to the energy-averaged cross-sections.
Keywords
Angular Distribution Master Equation Transmission Coefficient Compound Nucleus Direct ReactionPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- AB 70.E. Abramson, R.A. Eisenstein, I. Plesser, Z. Vager, J.P. Wurm, Nucl.Phys. A144 (1970) 321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- AG 75a.D. Agassi and H.A. Weidenmüller, Phys. Lett. 56B (1975) 305Google Scholar
- AG 75b.D. Agassi, H.A. Weidenmüller and G. Mantzouranis, Phys. Lett. 22C (1975)145Google Scholar
- AY 75.S. Ayik, B. Schürmann and W. Nörenberg, Z.Physik (in press)Google Scholar
- BE 37.H.A. Bethe, Revs. Mod. Phys. 9 (1937) 71ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- BL 71.M. Blann, Phys. Rev. Lett. 27 (1971) 337ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- BL 73a.M. Blann, in Lecture Notes in Physics, vol, 22, ed. by N. Cindro et al. (Springer Verlag, Berlin - Heidelberg - New York, 1973) p. 43Google Scholar
- BL 73b.M. Blann, Nucl, Phys. A213 (1973) 570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- BL 75a.E. Blanke, H. Genz, A. Richter and G. Schrieder, Phys.Lett. 58B (1975) 289Google Scholar
- BL 75b.M. Blann, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Science 25 (1975) 123ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- BO 36.N. Bohr, Nature 137 (1936) 344ADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- CL 71.C.K. Cline and M. Blann, Nucl, Phys. A172 (1971) 225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- CL 72.C.K. Cline, Nucl. Phys. A193 (1972) 417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- DA 75.S. Davis, C. Glashausser, A.B. Robbins, G. Bissinger, R. Albrecht, J.P. Wurm, Phys. Rev. Letts. 34 (1975) 215ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- EB 69.K.A. Eberhard, P. von Brentano, M. Böhning and R.O. Stephen, Nucl. Phys. Al25 (1969) 673Google Scholar
- ER 58.T. Ericson and V.M. Strutinsky, Nucl, Phys. 8 (1958) 284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- ER 66.T. Ericson and T. Mayer-Ruckuk, Ann. Revs. Nucl. Science 16 (1966) 183ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- FR 55.F.L. Friedman and V.F. Weisskopf, in “Niels Bohr and the Development of Physics”, ed. by W. Pauli ( Pergamon Press, New York, 1955 ) p. 134Google Scholar
- GA 72.Statistical Properties of Nuclei, ed. by J.B. Garg ( Plenum Press, New York - London, 1972 )Google Scholar
- GA 73.E. Gadioli and L. Milazzo-Colli, in Lecture Notes in Physics, vol. 22, ed. by N. Cindro et al. ( Springer Verlag, Berlin - Heidelberg - New York, 1973 ) p. 86Google Scholar
- GH 50.S.N.Ghoshal, Phys. Rev, 80 (1950) 939Google Scholar
- GR 66.J.J. Griffin, Phys. Rev, Lett. 17 (1966) 478Google Scholar
- GR 67.J.J. Griffin, Phys. Lett. B24 (1967) 5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- GR 74.G. Grave, H. Clement, J.H. Feist, W. Kretschmar and P. Pröschel, Phys. Rev. C10 (1974) 2340Google Scholar
- HA 52.W. Hauser and H. Feshbach, Phys. Rev. 87 (1952) 366ADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- HA 68.G.D. Harp, J.M. Miller and B.J. Berne, Phys. Rev. 165 (1968) 1166Google Scholar
- HA 71.G.D. Harp and J.M. Miller, Phys. Rev. C3 (1971) 1847ADSGoogle Scholar
- HO 74.H.M. Hofmann, J. Richert, W. Tepel and H.A. Weidenmüller, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 90 (1975) 403ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- HO 76.H. Hofmann and P. Siemens, Nucl. Phys. A257 (1976) 165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- JO 67.R.R. Johnson and N.M. Hintz, Phys. Rev. 153 (1967) 1169Google Scholar
- KA 73.M. Kawai, A.K. Kerman, and K.W. McVoy, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 72 (1973) 156ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- LA 57.A.M. Lane and J.E. Lynn, Proc. Phys. Soc. (London) A70 (1957) 557ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- MA 75] G. Mantzouranis, D. Agassi and H.A. Weidenmüller, Phys. Lett. 57B (1975)220Google Scholar
- MO 69.P.A. Moldauer, Phys. Rev. 177 (1969) 1841Google Scholar
- MO 75a.P.A. Moldauer, Phys.Rev. C11 (1975) 426ADSGoogle Scholar
- MO 75b.L.G. Moretto and J.S. Sventek, Phys. Lett. 58B (1975) 26Google Scholar
- NÖ 74a.W. Nörenberg, Proc.Int.Conf. on Reactions between Complex Nuclei, Nashville, U.S.A., 1974 (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1974 ) vol. 1, p. 90Google Scholar
- NÖ 74b.W. Nörenberg, Phys. Lett. 52B (1974) 289Google Scholar
- NÖ 75.W. Nörenberg, Z. Physik A274 (1975) 241ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- PA 28.W. Pauli, Festschrift zum 60. Geburtstag Sommerfelds, ed. by P. Debye ( Hirzel-Verlag, Leipzig, 1928 ) p. 30Google Scholar
- PO 65.C.E. Porter, Statistical theories of spectra: Fluctuations (Academic Press, Inc., New York, 1965 )Google Scholar
- RI 74.A. Richter, in Nuclear Spectroscopy and Reactions, ed. by J. Cerny,( Academic Press, New York, 1974 )Google Scholar
- VO 66.W. von Witsch, P. von Brentano, T. Mayer-Kuckuk, A. Richter, Nucl.Phys. 80 (1966) 394Google Scholar
- VE 69.V.V. Verbinsky and W.R. Burrus, Phys.Rev. 177 (1969) 1671ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- WE 40.V.F. Weisskopf and D.H. Ewing, Phys. Rev. 57 (1940). 472–935ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- WE 66.R.W. West, Phys. Rev. 141 (1966) 1033Google Scholar
- WO 51.L. Wolfenstein, Phys. Rev. 82 (1951) 690ADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar