The Dexterous human-arm like manipulator for Laparoscopic Surgery

Conference paper
Part of the IFMBE Proceedings book series (IFMBE, volume 14)

Abstract

This paper describes design of the dexterous manipulator for laparoscopic surgery that performs like a human whole arm and the FEM simulation result to measure the force of its tool-tip for including force-feedback loop. Though a human whole arm has 7 degrees of freedom, we have designed overall 8 degrees of freedom because of considering one dof translation motion that corresponds with human body movement. Some researchers reported that if we could develop either mechanical or electromechanical tele-operators which enable surgeons to move a MIS system in a manner analogous to an open instrument, we could potentially reduce the time of current laparoscopic procedures by at least 15% and we could perhaps also enable surgeons to perform procedures which are currently too difficult. Accordingly, we are expecting that the suggested design provides surgeon with improved dexterity during minimally invasive surgery.

Keywords

Laparoscopy Robotic surgery Teleoperation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Nowlin et al., “Grip strength with tactile feedback for robotic surgery”, U.S. Patent 6,594,552 B1, July 15, 2003Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    R. Mukherjee, G. Song and R. Satava, “An articulated manipulator for enhanced dexterity in minimally invasive surgery,” Proc. IEEE Eng. Med. Bio., 1996, pp.220–222Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    S. S. Sastry, M. Cohn and F. Tendick, “Millirobotics for remote, minimally invasive surgery”, Robotics and Autonomous Systems, Vol. 21, 1997, pp.305–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    R. D. Howe and Y. Matsuoka, “Robotics for surgery,” Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng., 1999, pp.211–240Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    J. Ruurda, T. Vroonhoven and I. Broeders, “Robot-assisted surgical systems: A new era in laparoscopic surgery,” Ann. R. Coll. Surg. Engl. Vol. 84, 2002, pp. 223–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    A. J. Hodgson, R. A. Pantazopol, M. D. Visser, S. E. Salcudean and A. G. Nagy, “Assessing potential benefits of enhanced dexterity in laparoscopic surgery,” Proc. IEEE/EMBS, Oct. 1997, pp.1966–1969Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    C. R. Wagner, N. Stylopoulos, and R. D. Howe, “The role of force feedback in surgery: Analysis of blunt dissection”, Tenth Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, Mar. 2002, 24–25Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    J. Arata, M. Mitsuishi, S. Warisawa, K. Tanaka, T. Yoshizawa and M. Hashizume, “Development of a dexterous minimally invasive surgical system with augmented force feedback capability”, IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. on Intelligent Robots and System, 2005, pp 3838–3743Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    A. J. Madhani, “Design of Teleoperated Surgical Instruments for Minimally Invasive Surgery,” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. Mech. Eng., MIT, Cambridge, MA, U.S.A, Feb. 1998, pp121–124Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Federation for Medical and Biological Engineering 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Mechanical EngineeringKAISTRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations