Using the Discrete Hilbert Transform for the comparison between Tracé Alternant and High Voltage Slow patterns extracted from full-term neonatal EEG

  • Danilo Barbosa Melges
  • A. F. C. Infantosi
  • F. R. Ferreira
  • D. B. Rosas
Part of the IFMBE Proceedings book series (IFMBE, volume 14)


This work aims at statistically evaluating the differences between two quiet sleep patterns, Tracé Alternant (TA) and High Voltage Slow (HVS) of EEG signals collected from derivation F4–P4 of 25 full-term newborns. Firstly, 124 artifact-free segments (30 s duration) during TA and 46 during HVS were selected. Then, each segment was filtered (6th order Butterwoth, zero-phase) in three distinct bands: slow delta (0.25–2 Hz), fast delta (2–4 Hz) and theta (4–8 Hz). By applying the Discrete Hilbert Transform (DHT) to these filtered signals, the envelope (A[n]) and the modulus of the instantaneous frequency (|Fi[n]|) were estimated. From these DHT dynamic spectral parameters, the sample distributions were determined and the medians obtained for each data segment. Based on this procedure, the medianvectors of HVS (mHVS) and of TA (mTA) for each parameter and each frequency band were formed. The time evolution of A[n] and |Fi[n]| for any pattern resembles the same characteristics (amplitude and frequency) of the original EEG signal. Moreover, applying the Wilcoxon rank sum test to mHVS and mTA, showed statistically significant differences (α = 0.05) between TA and HVS for A[n] in the three frequency bands. On the other hand, when this test is applied to |Fi[n]|, only the slow delta band presents significant difference. Hence, these findings could be used for distinguishing between HVS and TA.


neonatal EEG Sleep patterns Discrete Hilbert Transform 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Sher M S. (1999) Electroencephalography of the newborn: normal and abnormal features, in Niedermeyer E and Lopes da Silva, F (Eds): Electroencephalography: basic principles, clinical application, and related fields, Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, pp. 896–946.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Scher M S, Steppe D A, Banks D L. (1996) Prediction of Lower Developmental Performances of Healthy Neonates by Neonatal EEG-sleep measures. Paediatric Neurology 14:137–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Schwab K, Putsche P, Eiselt M, Helbig M, Witte H (2004) On the rhytimicity of quadratic phase coupling in the trace alternant EEG in healthy neonates. Neuroscience Letters 369: 179–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Acharya R U, Faust O, Kannathal N, Chua T, Laxminarayan S. (2005) Non-linear analysis of EEG signals at various sleep stages. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 80:37–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Corsi-Cabrera M, Muñoz-Torres Z, del Río-Protilla Y, Guevara M A. (2006) Power and coherent oscillations distinguish REM sleep, stage 1 and wakefulness. International Journal of Psychophysiology 60:59–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Witte H, Eisel M, Patakova I, Petranek S, Griessbach G, Krajca V, Rother M. (1991) Use of discrete Hilbert transformation for automatic spike mapping: a methodological investigation. Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing 29:242–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Melges D B, Infantosi A F C. (2004) Transformada Discreta de Hilbert na Diferenciação de Padrões de Sono do EEG de Recém-Nascidos. IFMBE Proc. vol. 5, Congresso Latino-americano de Engenharia Biomédica, João Pessoa (PB), Brazil, 2004, pp 1219–1222, CDROMGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Stockard-Pope J E, Werner S S, Bickford R G, Curran J S. (1992) Development of Sleep — Wake States, in Bickford R G, Stockard-Pope J E, Werner S S (Eds): Atlas of neonatal electroencephalography, New York: Raven Press, pp. 93–104Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lombroso C T. (1993) Neonatal EEG polygraphy in normal and abnormal newborns, in Niedermeyer E and Lopes da Silva F (Eds): Electroencephalography: basic principles, clinical applications, and related fields, Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, pp. 803–875.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Whalen A D (1971) Detection of Signals in Noise. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Oppenheim A V, Schafer R W (1975) Digital Signal Processing. Prentice-Hall, New JerseyMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Barlow J S (1985) Computer characterization of Tracé Alternant and REM sleep patterns in the neonatal EEG by adaptative segmentation — an exploratory study. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 60:163–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Federation for Medical and Biological Engineering 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Danilo Barbosa Melges
    • 1
  • A. F. C. Infantosi
    • 1
  • F. R. Ferreira
    • 1
  • D. B. Rosas
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Biomedical Engineering ProgramFederal University of Rio de JaneiroRio de JaneiroBrazil
  2. 2.UnigranrioRio de JaneiroBrazil

Personalised recommendations