Advertisement

Development of a pan-European River and Catchment Database

  • Jürgen Vogt
  • Pierre Soille
  • Roberto Colombo
  • Maria Luisa Paracchini
  • Alfred de Jager
Part of the Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography book series (LNGC)

abstract

The availability of a European-wide database of consistent and hierarchically structured river networks and associated drainage basins is a major asset for the implementation and follow-up of environmental policies in the European Union and an important basis for international modelling and monitoring activities. In fact, drainage basins are important reference units for many biophysical processes and rivers represent major transport networks not only for water, but also for sediments, nutrients and pollutants.

Keywords

Digital Elevation Model Drainage Basin River Network Drainage Density European Environment Agency 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Annoni A, Luzet C, Gubler E, IHDE J (eds) (2003) Map Projections for Europe. European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Ispra (Va), EUR 20120 EN. 131p.Google Scholar
  2. Annoni A. (ed.) (2005) European Reference Grids. Proposal for a European Reference System. Proceedings of the European Reference Grid Workshop, 27–29 October 2003, Ispra (VA), Italy. European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Ispra (Va), EUR 21494 EN, 189p.Google Scholar
  3. Bagli S, Soille P (2003) Morphological automatic extraction of coastline from pan-European Landsat TM images. In: Proceedings of the Fifth Int. Symp. on GIS and Computer Cartography for Coastal Zone Management, GISIG and ICCOPS, Genova, 58–59Google Scholar
  4. Boschet AF, de Paepe V, Lack TJ (2000) Inland Waters. Annual topic update. European Environment Agency, Topic Report 1/2000, Luxembourg, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 30 p.Google Scholar
  5. Britton P (2002) Review of Existing River Coding Systems for River Basin Management and Reporting. WED GIS Working Group, October 2002, 29p. http://193.178.L168/River_Coding_Review.htm, 29 p.
  6. Colombo R, Vogt JV, Bertolo F (2001) Deriving drainage networks and catchment boundaries at the European scale. A new approach combining Digital Elevation Data and environmental characteristics. EUR 19805 EN, Luxemberg, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 58 p.Google Scholar
  7. Colombo R, Vogt JV, Soille P, Paracchini ML, de Jager A (2005) On the derivation of river networks and catchments at European scale from medium resolution digital elevation data. CATENA (submitted)Google Scholar
  8. Dietrich WE, Wilson CJ, Montgomery DR, McKean J, Bauer R (1992) Erosion thresholds and land surface morphology. Geology 20:675–679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Döll P, Lehner B (2002) Validation of a new global 30-min drainage direction map. J Hydrol 258:214–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. EEA, European Environment Agency (1997) CORINE Land Cover Technical Guide. European Topic Centre Land Cover (ETC/LC), http://image2000.jrc.it/reports/techn ical_guide.pdf.
  11. ESBSC European Soil Bureau Scientific Committee (1998) Georeferenced soil data-base for Europe, Manual of Procedures. EUR 16393 EN, European Commission — JRC, Ispra, 184 p.Google Scholar
  12. Foster GR, Flanagan DC, Nearing MA, Lane LJ, Risee LM, Finkner SC (1995) Hillslope erosion component.-In: Flanagan DC, Nearing MA (eds) WEPP: USDA-Water Erosion Prediction Project: 11.1-11.12; NSERL Report No. 10, USDA ARS, Lafayette, INGoogle Scholar
  13. Furnans F and Olivera F (2001) Watershed topology: The Pfafstetter system. Proc. 21st ESRI User Conference, ESRI, San Diego, CA.Google Scholar
  14. Gisotti G (1983) Geologia e Pedologia nell’assetto del territorio. Bologna (Ed. Edagricole)Google Scholar
  15. Graham ST, Famiglietti JS, Maidment DR (1999) Five-minute, 1/2 and 1 degree data sets of continental watersheds and river networks for use in regional and global hydrologic and climate system modelling studies. Water Resour Res 35:583–587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hancock GR (2005) The use of digital elevation models in the identification and characterization of catchments over different grid scales. Hydrol. Proc. DOI: 10.1002/hyp.5632Google Scholar
  17. Horton RE (1945) Erosional development of streams and their drainage basins; hydrophysical approach to quantitative morphology. Bull Geol Soc Am 56:275–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ibbit RP, Willgoose GR, Duncan M (1999) Channel network simulation models compared with data from Ashley River (New Zealand). Water Resour Res 35:3875–3890CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ijjasz-Vasquez EJ, Bras RL (1995) Scaling regimes of local slope versus contributing area in digital elevation models. Geomorphology 12:299–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kirkby MJ (1999) Definition and practical demonstration of a pre-operational sysmote sensing methods. 1st Annual Report, MODEM Project, JRC-Space Applications Institute, Ispra (Va), Italy.Google Scholar
  21. McNamara JP, Kane DL, Hinzman LD (1999) An analysis of an arctic channel network using a digital elevation model. Geomorphology 29:339–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Moglen GE, Eltahir EAB, Bras RL (1998) On the sensitivity of drainage density to climate change. Water Resour Res 34:855–862CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Montgomery DR, Foufoula—Georgiou E (1993) Channel network source representation using Digital Elevation Models. Water Resour Res 29:3925–3934CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Montgomery DR, Dietrich WE (1994) A physically-based model for the topographic control on shallow landsliding. Water Resour Res 30:1153–1171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Montgomery DR (2001) Slope distributions, threshold hillslopes, and steady-state topography. American J Science 301:432–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nippel T and Klingl T (1998) Swiss Land Use in the European context. Integration of Swiss Land Use statistics with CORINE Land Cover. Swiss Federal Statistical Office & Swiss Agency for the Environment, Neuchâtel, ISBN 3-303-02045-0, 41 p.Google Scholar
  27. Nixon S, Grath J, Bogestrand J (1998) Eurowaternet. The European Environment European Environment Agency, Technical Report No. 7, Copenhagen (EEA) 47 p.Google Scholar
  28. Oguchi T (1997) Drainage density and relative relief in humid steep mountains with frequent slope failure. Earth Surf Processes and Landforms 22: 107–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Oki T, Sud YC (1998) Design of Total Runoff Integrating Pathways (TRIP) — a global river channel network, Earth Interact 2(2-001):53 pp.Google Scholar
  30. Renssen H, Knoop J (2000) A global river routing network for use in hydrological modeling. J Hydrol 230:230–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Roth G, La Barbera P, Greco M (1996) On the description of the basin effective drainage structure. J Hydrol 187:119–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Saundres W (1999) Preparation of DEMs for use in environmental modelling. http://www.esri.com/library/userconf/proc99/proceed/papers/pap802/p802.ht
  33. Soille P (2002) Advances in the analysis of topographic features on discrete images. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2301:175–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Soille P, Vogt JV, Colombo R (2003) Carving and adaptive drainage enforcement of grid digital elevation models. Water Resour Res 39:1366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Soille P (2003) Morphological image analysis: Principles and applications. 2nd Edition, Springer, New York [Corrected 2nd printing, 2004].Google Scholar
  36. Strahler AN (1952) Hypsometric (area-altitude) analysis of erosional topography. Bull Geol Soc Am 63:1117–1142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Strahler AN (1957) Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology. Trans Am Geophys Union 38: 913–920Google Scholar
  38. Tarboton DG (1997) A new method for the determination of flow directions and upslope areas in grid digital elevation models. Water Resour Res 33:309–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tarboton DG, Bras RL, Rodriquez-Iturbe I (1991) On the extraction of channel networks from digital elevation data. Hydrol Proc 5: 81–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Tucker GE, Gasparini NM, Lancaster ST, Bras RL (1997) An integrated hillslope and channel evolution model as an investigation and prediction tool. Technical Report prepared for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Construction Engineering Research LaboratoriesGoogle Scholar
  41. Tucker GE, Bras RL (1998) Hillslope processes, drainage density, and landscape morphology. Water Resour Res 34: 2751–2764CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Verdin KL (1997) A System for topologically coding global drainage basins and stream networks. Proc. ESRI Users Conference, ESRI, San Diego, CA. http://lpdaac.usgs.gov/gtopo30/hydro/p311.asp Google Scholar
  43. Verdin KL, Jenson SK (1996) Development of continental scale DEMs and extraction of hydrographic features. Third International Conference/Workshop on Integrating GIS and Environmental Modeling. Santa Fe, USA, http://edcdaac.usgs.gov/gtopo30/papers/santafe3.html
  44. Verdin KL, Verdin JP (1999) Topological system for delineation and codification of the Earth’s river basins. J Hydrol 218: 1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Vogt JV, Colombo R, Paracchini ML, Soille P, de Jager A, Folving S (2003a) A European landscape stratification reflecting drainage density In: Helming K, Wiggering H (eds) Sustainable Development of Multifunctional Landscapes. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, pp 95–110Google Scholar
  46. Vogt JV, Colombo R, Bertolo F (2003b) Deriving drainage networks and catchment boundaries. A new approach combining digital elevation data and environmental characteristics. Geomorphology 53:281–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Vogt JV, Colombo R, Paracchini ML, de Jager A, Soille P (2003c): CCM River and Catchment Database, Version 1.0. EUR 20756 EN, European Commission —Joint Research Centre, Ispra (Varese), Italy, 30p. (http://agrienv.jrc.it/activities/pdfs/CCM-Report-EUR20756EN.pdf Google Scholar
  48. Walker JP, Willgoose GR (1999) On the effect of digital elevation model accuracy on hydrology and geomorphology. Water Resour Res 35:2259–2268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Whipple KX, Tucker GE (2002) Implications of sediment-flux dependent river incision models for landscape evolution. J Geoph Res 107(B2):310–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Willgoose GR (1994) A statistic for testing the elevation characteristics of landscape simulation models. J Geoph Res 99(B7):13987–13996CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wolock DM, Price CV (1994) Effects of digital elevation model map scale and data resolution on a topography based watershed model. Water Resour Res 30:1665–1680CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jürgen Vogt
  • Pierre Soille
    • 1
  • Roberto Colombo
  • Maria Luisa Paracchini
  • Alfred de Jager
  1. 1.Spatial Data Infrastructures Unit, Institute for Environment and Sustainability DG Joint Research CentreEuropean CommissionUK

Personalised recommendations