Computer-Assisted Surgery for Correction of Skeletal Deformities

  • M. A. Hafez
  • E. H. Schemitsch
  • M. Fadel
  • G. Hosny

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Verma I (2001) Burden of genetic disorders in India. Indian J Pediatr. 2000; 67-893-898. Erratum in: Indian J Pediatr 68(1): 25Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fehring TK, Odum S, Griffin WL, Mason JB, Nadaud M (2001) Early failure in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 392: 315–318PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sharkey PF, Hozack WJ, Rothman RH, Shastri S, Jacoby SM (2002) Insall Award paper. Why are knee replacements failing today? Clin Orthop Relat Res 404: 7–13PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chillag KJ, Nichollas PJ (1984) High tibial osteotomy: A retrospective analysis of 30 cases. Orthopaedics 7: 1821Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Coventry MB, Ilstrup DM, Wallrichs SL (1993) Proximal tibial osteotomy. A critical long-term study of eighty-seven cases. J Bone Joint Surg 75-A-2: 196–201PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sparmann M, Wolke B, Czupalla H, Banzer D, Zink A (2003) Positioning of total knee arthroplasty with and without navigation support. A prospective, randomised study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 85: 830–835PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chauhan SK, Scott RG, Breidahl W, Beaver RJ (2004) Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty versus a conventional jig-based technique. A randomised, prospective trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86-3: 372–377PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Saragaglia D, Picard F, Chaussard E, Montbarbon F, Leitner F, Cinquin P (2001) Computer assisted total knee arthroplasty: comparison with a conventional procedure. Results of a 50 case prospective randomized study. First Annual Meeting of Computer Assisted Orthopedic Surgery. Davos, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chin PL, Yang KY, Yeo SJ, Lo NN (2005) Randomized control trial comparing radiographic total knee arthroplasty implant placement using computer navigation versus conventional technique. J Arthroplasty 20: 618–626PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Decking R, Markmann Y, Fuchs J, Puhl W, Scharf HP (2005) Leg axis after computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized trial comparing computer-navigated and manual implantation. J Arthroplasty 20: 282–288PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Victor J, Hoste D (2004) Image-based computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty leads to lower variability in coronal alignment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 428: 131–139PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Stockl B, Nogler M, Rosiek R, Fischer M, Krismer M, Kessler O (2004) Navigation improves accuracy of rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 426: 180–186PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nabeyama R, Matsuda S, Miura H, Mawatari T, Kawano T, Iwamoto Y (2003) The accuracy of image guided knee replacement based on computed tomography. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86: 366–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Perlick L, Bathis H, Tingart M et al. (2004) Navigation in total-knee arthroplasty: CT-based implantation compared with the conventional technique. Acta Orthrop Scand 75: 464–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bolognesi M, Hoffman A (2005) Computer navigation versus standard instrumentation for TKA: a single-surgeon experience. Clin Orthop Relat Res 440: 162–169PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Anderson KC, Buehler KC, Markel DC (2005) Computer assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty: comparison with conventional methods. J Arthroplasty 20 (Suppl 7): 132–138PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kim SJ, MacDonald M, Hernandez J, Wixson RL (2005) Computer assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty: improved coronal alignment. J Arthroplasty 20 (Suppl 3): 123–131PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Haaker RG, Stockheim M, Kamp M, Proff G, Breitenfelder J, Ottersbach A (2005) Computer-assisted navigation increases precision of component placement in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 433: 152–159PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kalairajah Y SD, Cossey AJ, Verral GM, Spriggins AJ (2005) Blood loss after total knee replacement: Effects of computer-assisted surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87: 1480–1482PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hafez M, Smith R, Matthews S, Kalap N, Sherman K (2005) Radiation exposure to the hands of orthopaedic surgeons: Are we underestimating the risk? Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 125: 330–335PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hafez MA, Chelule K, Seedhom BB, Sherman KP (2006) Computerassisted total knee arthroplasty using patient-specific templating. Clin Orthop Relat Res 444: 184–192PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hafez MA, Jaramaz B, Di Gioia A III (2006) Computer Assisted Surgery of the Knee: An overview. In: Insall JN, Scott N (eds) Surgery of the Knee, 4th edn, vol. 2. Churchill Livingston, Philadelphia, pp 1655–1674Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hosny G (2005) Treatment of tibial hemimelia without amputation: preliminary report. J Pediatr Orthop B 14: 250–255PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hosny G, Fadel M (2003) Ilizarov external fixator for open fractures of the tibial shaft. Int Orthop 27: 303–306PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Taylor J (2002) Six-axis deformity analysis and correction. In: Paley D (ed) Principles of Deformity Correction. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 411–436Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Taylor JC (2005) The correction of general deformities with the taylor spatial frame fixator,« http://www.jcharlestaylor.comGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Rodl R LB, Bohm A, Winkelmann W (2003) Correction of deformities with conventional and hexapod frames—comparison of methods. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 141: 92–98PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Rozbruch SR HD, Blyakher A (2002) Distraction of hypertrophic non-union of tibia with deformity using Ilizarov/Taylor Spatial Frame: reportof two cases. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 122: 295–298PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Seide K WD, Kortmann HR (1999) Fracture reduction and deformity correction with hexapod Ilizarov fixator. Clin Orthop Relat Res 363: 186–195PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Sluga M PM, Kotz R, Nehrer S (2003) Lower limb deformities in children: two-stage correction using the Taylor spatial frame. J Pediatr Orthop B 12: 123–128PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Fadel M, Hosny G (2005) The Taylor spatial frame for deformity correction in the lower limbs. Int Orthop 29: 125–129PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Paley D (2002) Radiographic assessment of lower limb deformities. In: In: Paley D, ed. Principles of Deformity Correction. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 31–60Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Tucker HKJ, Kinnebrew TE (1992) Management of unstable open and closed tibial fractures using the Ilizarov method. Clin Orthop Relat Res 280: 125–135PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ilizarov G (1992) Transosseous osteosynthesis. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 287–543Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Feldman DS, Madan S, Koval KJ (2003) Correction of tibial malunion and nonunion with six-axis analysis deformity correction using the Taylor Spatial Frame. J Orthop Trauma 17: 549–554PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Tetsworth KD, Paley D (1994) Accuracy of correction of complex lower extremity deformities by the Ilizarov method. Clin Orthop Relat Res301: 102–110PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Medizin Verlag Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. A. Hafez
    • 1
    • 2
  • E. H. Schemitsch
    • 3
    • 4
  • M. Fadel
    • 5
  • G. Hosny
    • 6
  1. 1.The Institute for Computer Assisted Orthopaedic SurgeryPittsburghUSA
  2. 2.Western Pennsylvania HospitalPittsburghUSA
  3. 3.Orthopaedic DepartmentSt Michael HospitalCanada
  4. 4.Orthopaedic DepartmentUniversity of TorontoCanada
  5. 5.El-Minia University HospitalEl-MiniaEgypt
  6. 6.Faculty of MedicineBenha UniversityBenhaEgypt

Personalised recommendations