Plant Species Migration as a Key Uncertainty in Predicting Future Impacts of Climate Change on Ecosystems: Progress and Challenges

  • Guy F. Midgley
  • Wilfried Thuiller
  • Steven I. Higgins
Part of the Global Change — The IGBP Series book series (GLOBALCHANGE)

11.5 Summary and Conclusions

As we show above, a failure to incorporate migration limitations into models of vegetation response to climate change greatly compromises their predictive capability, and the uncertainty due to migration is therefore substantial. Species range shifts have been a ubiquitous response by plant species during Pleistocene climate change, and early signs of this response are evident in modern assemblages. Recent work has increased our understanding of the dispersal limitations to migration rate, but there has been far less focus on the issues which govern population establishment and growth rate, especially at the edge of species’ ranges.

An overall understanding of community responses to climate change would also benefit from better understanding of in situ adaptive responses, as these appear to be significant in some species. Much has been learned from reconstructions of past migration patterns in the paleo-record, and from studies of alien invasive plants, but these “natural experiments” are limited in that they represent special cases where species migration occurs over landscapes unfragmented by human activities (paleo- record), or are experiencing release from predators and pathogens (alien species).

Finally, promising approaches are being developed that address the issue of how human transformation of landscapes will modify migration rates, and that combine mechanistic migration models with spatially explicit models of species geographic ranges at spatial scales relevant to simulating plant propagule dispersal and demographic behavior. These approaches will provide useful insights into biodiversity change under climate and landuse change scenarios. However, the potential increase in spatial resolution of DGVM simulations, and their increasing capacity to simulate more finely defined plant functional types, will allow them to provide an independent alternative assessment of the role of migration in determining the future structure and function of the ecosystems of the Earth.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anderson RP, Gomez-Laverde M, Peterson AT (2002) Geographical distributions of spiny pocket mice in South America: insights from predictive models. Global Ecology and Biogeography 11:131–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Araújo MB, Williams P (2000) Selecting areas for species persistence using occurrence data. Biological Conservation 96:331–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Araújo MB, Cabeza M, Thuiller W, Hannah L, Williams PH (2004) Would climate change drive species out of reserves? An assessment of existing reserve-selection methods. Global Change Biology 10:1618–1626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Austin MP, Smith TM (1989) A new model for the continuum concept. Vegetatio 83:35–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Austin MP, Nicholls AO, Doherty MD, Meyers JA (1994) Determining species response functions to an environmental gradient by means of a beta-function. Journal of Vegetation Science 5:215–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bachelet D, et al. (2003) Simulating past and future dynamics of natural ecosystems in the United States. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 17(2), 1045, doi:10.1029/2001GB001508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bakkenes M, Alkemade JRM, Ihle F, Leemans R, Latour JB (2002) Assessing effects of forecasted climate change on the diversity and distribution of European higher plants for 2050. Global Change Biology 8:390–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barnosky CW (1987) Response of vegetation to climate changes of different duration in the late Neogene. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 2:247–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Beier C, et al. (2004) Novel approaches to study climate change effects on terrestrial ecosystems in the field: Drought and passive nighttime warming. Ecosystems 7:583–597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Birks HJB (1986) Late-Quaternary biotic changes in terrestrial and lacustrine environments, with particular reference to north-west Europe. In: Berglund BE (ed) Handbook of Holocene Paleoecology and Paleohydrology. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  11. Birks HJB (1993) Quaternary paleoecology and vegetation science — current contributions and possible future developments. Rev. Paleobot. Palynol. 79:153–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bond WJ, Midgley JJ (2001) Ecology of sprouting in woody plants: the persistence niche. TREE 16:45–51Google Scholar
  13. Bond WJ, Midgley GF, Woodward FI (2003) The importance of low atmospheric CO2 and fire in promoting the spread of grasslands and savannas. Global Change Biology 9:973–982CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Box EO (1996) Plant functional types and climate at the global scale. Journal of Vegetation Science 7:309–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Brewer AM, Gaston KJ (2003) The geographical range structure of the holly leaf-miner. II. Demographic rates. Journal of Animal Ecology 72:82–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Clark JS (1998) Why trees migrate so fast: confronting theory with dispersal biology and the paleo-record. American Naturalist 152:204–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Clark JS, et al. (1998) Reid’s paradox of rapid plant migration: dispersal theory and interpretation of palaeoecological records. BioScience 48:13–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Clark JS, Lewis M, McLachlan JS, HilleRisLambers J (2003) Estimating population spread: What can we forecast and how well? Ecology 84:1979–1988Google Scholar
  19. Collingham YC, Huntley B (2000) Impacts of habitat fragmentation and patch size upon migration rates. Ecological Applications 10:131–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Collingham YC, Hill MO, Huntley B (1996) The migration of sessile organisms: a simulation model with measurable parameters. Journal of Vegetation Science 7:831–846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cramer W, et al. (2001) Global response of terrestrial ecosystem structure and function to CO2 and climate change: results from six dynamic global vegetation models. Global Change Biology 7:357–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Cwynar LC, MacDonald GM (1987) Geographical variation of lodgepole pine in relation to population history. American Naturalist 129:463–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Davis MB (1976) Pleistocene biogeography of temperate deciduous forests. Geoscience and Man 13:13–26Google Scholar
  24. Davis MB (1983) Holocene vegetational history of the eastern United States. In: Wright HE (ed) Late-Quaternary environments of the United States. University of Minneapolis, Minneapolis, MN, USAGoogle Scholar
  25. Davis MB, Shaw RG (2001) Range shifts and adaptative responses to quaternary climate change. Science 292:673–679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Davis AJ, Jenkinson LS, Lawton JH, Shorrocks B, Wood S (1998a) Making mistakes when predicting shifts in species range in response to global warming. Nature 391:783–786CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Davis AJ, Lawton JH, Shorrocks B, Jenkinson LS (1998b) Individualistic species responses invalidate simple physiological models of community dynamics under global environmental change. Journal of Animal Ecology 67:600–612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Foley JA, Levis S, Prentice IC, Pollard D, Thompsons SL (1998) Coupling dynamics models of climate and vegetation. Global Change Biology 4:561–579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Franco M, Silvertown J (2004) A comparative demography of plants based upon elasticities of vital rates. Ecology 85:531–538Google Scholar
  30. Graham RW (1992) Late pleistocene faunal changes as a guide to understanding effects of greenhous warming on the mammalian fauna of North America. In: Peters RL, Lovejoy T (eds) Global warming and biological diversity. Yale University, New Haven and LondonGoogle Scholar
  31. Guisan A, Zimmermann NE (2000) Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. Ecological Modelling 135:147–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hampe A (2004) Bioclimate envelope models: what they detect and waht they hide. Global Ecology & Biogeography 13:469–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hampe A, Petit RJ (2005) Conserving biodiversity under climate change: the rear edge matters. Ecology Letters 8(5):461–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hannah L, Midgley GF, Millar D (2002) Climate change integrated conservation strategies. Global Ecology and Biogeography 11:485–495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Higgins SI, et al. (2003) Forecasting plant migration rates: managing uncertainty for risk assessment. Journal of Ecology 91:341–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Higgins SI, Richardson DM (1999) Predicting plant migration rates in a changing world: The role of long-distance dispersal. American Naturalist 153:464–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Higgins SI, Richardson DM, Cowling RM (2001) Validation of a spatial simulation model of a spreading alien plant population. Journal of Applied Ecology 38:571–584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Higgins SI, Nathan R, Cain ML (2003) Are long-distance dispersal events in plants usually caused by nonstandard means of dispersal? Ecology 84(8):1945–1956Google Scholar
  39. Hobbs RJ (2000) Land-use changes and invasions. In: Mooney HA, Hobbs HA (eds) The impact of global change on alien species. Island Press, Washington D.CGoogle Scholar
  40. Hodkinson DJ, Thompson K (1997) Plant dispersal: the role of man. Journal of Applied Ecology 34:1481–1496Google Scholar
  41. Hoffman MH (2001) The distribution of Senecio vulgaris: capacity of climate change models for predicting adventitious ranges. Flora 196:395–403Google Scholar
  42. Holoyac M (2000) Spatiotemporal dynamic models of plant populations and communities. The American Naturalist 156:378–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hughes L (2000) Biological consequences of global warming: is the signal already apparent? TREE 15:56–61Google Scholar
  44. Huntley B (1990) European post-glacial forests: compositional changes in response to climate change. Journal of Vegetation Science 1:507–518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Huntley B, Birks HJB (1983) An atlas of past and present pollen maps for Europe o-13000 years ago. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  46. Huntley B, Webb TI (1988) Vegetation history. Kluwer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  47. Huntley B, Berry PM, Cramer W, McDonald AP (1995) Modelling present and potential future ranges of some European higher plants using climate response. Journal of Biogeography 22:967–1001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Iverson LR, Prasad AM (2002) Potential redistribution of tree species habitat under five climate change scenarios in the eastern US. Forest Ecology and Management 155:205–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Iverson LR, Schwartz MW, Prasad A (2004) How fast and far might tree species migrate in the eastern United States due to climate change? Global Ecology & Biogeography 13:209–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Jansson R (2003) Global patterns in endemism explained by past climatic change. Proceedings of the Royal Society London B 270:583–590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Janzen DH, Martin PS (1982) Neotropical anachronisms: the fruits the gomphotheres ate. Science 215:19–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Keane R, Crawley MJ (2002) Exotoc plant invasions and the enemy release hypothesis. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 17:164–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Kirilenko AP, Belotelov NV, Bogatyrev BG (2000) Global model of vegetation migration: incorporation of climatic variability. Ecological Modelling 132:125–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Lavorel S, Garnier E (2002) Predicting changes in community composition and ecosystem functioning from plant trait: revisiting the Holy Grail. Functional Ecology 16:545–556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Lavorel S, Gardner RH, O’Neill RV (1995) Dispersal of annual plants in hierarchically structured landscapes. Landscape Ecology 10: 277–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Leathwick JR, Austin MP (2001) Competitive interactions between tree species in New Zealand’s old-growth indigenous forests. Ecology 82:2560–2573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Leibold MA (1995) The niche concept revisited: mechanistic models and community context. Ecology 76:1371–1382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Loehle C, LeBlanc D (1996) Model-based assessments of climate change effects on forests: A critical review. Ecological Modelling 90:1–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. MacDonald GM (1993) Fossil pollen analysis and the re-construction of plant invasions. Advances in Ecological Research 24:67–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Malanson GP (2003) Dispersal across continuous and binary representations of landscapes. Ecological Modelling 169:17–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Malcolm JR, Markham A, Neilson RP, Garaci M (2002) Estimated migration rates under scenarios of global climate change. Journal of Biogeography 29:835–849CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. McClachlan JS, Clark JS (2004) Reconstructing historical ranges with fossil data at continental scales. Forest Ecology and Management 197:139–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. McDonald DJ, Cowling RM (1995) Towards a profile of an endemic mountain fynbos flora: implications for conservation. Biological Conservation 72:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Mooney HA, Hobbs RJ (2000) Invasive species in a changing world. Island Press, Washington, D.C, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  65. Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, Da Fonseca GAB, Kent J (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403:853–858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Nakicenovic N, Swart R (eds) (2000) Emissions Scenarios: A Special Report of Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  67. Nathan R, Perry G, Cronin JT, Strand AE, Cain ML (2003) Methods for estimating long-distance dispersal. Oikos 103:261–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Neilson RP, Pitelka LF, Solomon AM, Nathan R, Midgley GF, Fragoso JMV, Lischke H, Thompson K (2005) Forecasting regional to global plant migration in response to climate change. BioScience 55:749–759CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Neubert M, Caswell H (2000) Demography and dispersal: Calculation and sensitivity analysis of invasion speed for structured populations. Ecology 81:1613–1628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Nowak CL, Nowak RS, Tausch RJ, Wigand PE (1994) Tree and shrub dynamics in northwestern Great Basin woodland and shrub steppe during the late-Pleistocene and Holocene. American Journal of Botany 81:265–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Parmesan C, Yohe G (2003) A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems. Nature 421: 37–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Parmesan C, et al. (1999) Poleward shifts in geographical ranges of butterfly species associated with regional warming. Nature 399:578–583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Pearson RG, Dawson TE (2003) Predicting the impacts of climate change on the distribution of species: are bioclimate envelope models useful? Global Ecology & Biogeography 12: 361–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Peterson AT (2001) Predicting species’ geographic distributions based on ecological niche modeling. The Condor 103:599–605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Peterson AT (2003) Predicting the geogaphy of species’ invasions via ecological niche modellingg. The Quarterly Review of Biology 78:419–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Peterson AT, Vieglais DA (2001) Predicting species invasions using ecological niche modeling: new approaches from bioinformatics attack a pressing problem. BioScience 51:363–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Peterson AT, et al. (2002) Future projections for Mexican faunas under global climate change scenarios. Nature 416:626–629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Peterson AT, Papes M, Kluza DA (2003) Predicting the potential invasive distributions of four alien plant species in North America. Weed Science 51:863–868CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Pitelka LF, et al. (1997) Plant migration and climate change. American Scientist 85:464–501Google Scholar
  80. Prentice IC (1986) Vegetation response to past climatic variation. Vegetatio 67:131–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Prentice IC, Cramer W, Harrison SP, Leemans R, Monserud RA, Solomon AM (1992) A global biome model based on plant physiology and dominance, soil properties and climate. Journal of Biogeography 19:117–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Pulliam HR (2000) On the relationship between niche and distribution. Ecology Letters 3:349–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Rehfeldt GE, Ying CC, Spittlehouse DL, Hamilton jr. DA (1999) Genetic responses to climate in Pinus contorta: Niche breadth, climate change, and reforestation. Ecological Monographs 69: 375–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Rejmanek M, Richardon DM, Higgins SI, Pitcairn MJ, Grotkopp E (2004) Ecology of invasive plants: state of the art. In: Mooney HA, McNeely JA, Neville L, Schei PJ, Waage J (eds) Invasive alien species: searching for solutions, Island, Washington, D.CGoogle Scholar
  85. Richardson DM, et al. (2000) Invasive alien organisms and global change: A South African Perspective. In: Mooney HA, Hobbs HA (eds) The impact of global change on alien species. Island Press, Washington D.CGoogle Scholar
  86. Ridley HN (1930) The dispersal of plants throughout the world. Reeve, Ashford, UKGoogle Scholar
  87. Sagarin RD, Gaines SD (2002) The ‘abundant centre’ distribution: to what extent is it a biogeographical rule? Ecology Letters 5:137–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Schwartz MW, Iverson LR, Prasad AM (2001) Predicting the potential future distribution of four tree species in Ohio using current habitat availability and climatic forcing. Ecosystems 4:568–581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Shigesada N, Kawasaki K, Takeda, Y (1995) Modelling stratified diffusion in biological invasions. American Naturalist 146:229–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Shugart HH, Smith TM, Post WM (1992) The application of individual-based simulation models for assessing the effects of global change. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 23:15–38Google Scholar
  91. Sitch S, et al. (2003) Evaluation of ecosystem dynamics, plant geography and terrestrial carbon cycling in the LPJ Dynamic Global Vegetation Model. Global Change Biology 9:161–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Skellam JG (1951) Random dispersal in theoretical populations. Biometrika 38:196–218Google Scholar
  93. Smith TM, Shugart HH, Woodward FI (1997) Plant Functional Types, Their Relevance to Ecosystem Properties and Global Change. Cambridge Univ. Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  94. Smith B, Prentice IC, Sykes MT (2001) Representation of vegetation dynamics in modelling of European ecosystems: comparison of two contrasting approaches. Global Ecology & Biogeography 10 (ETEMA special issue):621–637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Solomon AM (1986) Transient response of forests to CO2-induced climate change: simulation modeling experiments in eastern North America. Oecologia 68:567–579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Sutherst RW, Maywald HF, Russel BL (2000) Estimating vulnerability under global change: modular modelling of pests. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 82:303–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Thomas CD, et al. (2004) Extinction risk from climate change. Nature 427:145–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Thuiller W (2003) BIOMOD: Optimising predictions of species distributions and projecting potential future shifts under global change. Global Change Biology 9:1353–1362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Thuiller W (2004) Patterns and uncertainties of species’ range shifts under climate change. Global Change Biology 10:2020–2027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. van Rheede van Oudtshoorn K, van Rooyen MW (1999) Dispersal biology of desert plants. Springer-Verlag, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  101. Vucetich JA, Waite TA (2003) Spatial patterns of demography and genetic processes across the species’ range: Null hypotheses for landscape conservation genetics. Conservation Genetics 4:639–645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Walther G-R, Burga CA, Edwards PJ (2001) Fingerprints of climate change — adapted behaviour and shifting species ranges. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  103. Walther G-R, et al. (2002) Ecological responses to recent climate change. Nature 416:389–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Webb TI (1981) The past 11,000 years of vegetational change in eastern North America. BioScience 31:501–506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Webb TI (1992) Past changes in vegetation and climate: lessons for the future. In: Peters RL, Lovejoy TE (eds) Global warming and biological diversity. Yale University, New Haven and LondonGoogle Scholar
  106. Welk E, Schubert K, Hoffman MH (2002) Present and potential distribution of invasive garlic mustard (Allaria petiolata) in North America. Diversity and Distribution 8:219–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Woodward FI, Smith TM, Emanuel WR (1995) A global land primary productivity and phytogeography model. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 9:471–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Guy F. Midgley
    • 1
  • Wilfried Thuiller
    • 2
  • Steven I. Higgins
    • 3
  1. 1.Global Change Research GroupSouth African National Biodiversity InstituteClaremont, Cape TownSouth Africa
  2. 2.Laboratoire d’Ecologie Alpine, UMR-CNRS 5553Université J. FourierGrenobleFrance
  3. 3.Lehrstuhl für VegetationsökologieTechnische Universität MünchenFreising-WeihenstephanGermany

Personalised recommendations