Advertisement

Interactive Tools for e-Democracy: Examples from Switzerland

  • Jean-Loup Chappelet
  • Pierre Kilchenmann
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3416)

Abstract

Democracy is based on freedom of voting but also on meaningful discussions about matters that are put to the vote or about people who wish to be elected. E-democracy cannot therefore be reduced to e-voting. It should also include Internet-based services that facilitate online interaction between voters, candidates and supporters of various opinions. This paper presents a series of interactive tools that can be used to support such a virtual dialogue. A matrix is proposed to categorize these tools. Examples of such tools used in Switzerland are given. The most sophisticated tools and websites recently developed for Swiss elections or referendums are described in some detail. Possible future research on the impact of these tools is outlined.

Keywords

Liberal Democratic Party Direct Democracy Interactive Tool Federal Election Federal Council 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Ahlert, C.: Weltweite Wahlen im Internet: Möglichkeiten und Grenzen transnationaler Demokratie. Campus Verlag, Frankfurt (2003)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aidemak, J.: A Knowledge Perspective on E-Democracy. In: Traunmüller, R. (ed.) EGOV 2003, vol. 2739, pp. 319–324. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Alvarez, R., Hall, T.: Point, Click, and Vote: The Future of Internet Voting. Brookings Institution Press, Washington (2004)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fédérale, C.: Le vote électronique dans sa phase pilote, Bern (2004)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chappelet, J.-L.: The appropriation of e-mail and Internet by members of the Swiss Parliament. Information Polity 9(1-2), 89–102 (2004)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Christin, T., Trechsel, A.: Who votes via the Internet? A scientific approach to polling in Carouge and Meyrin (2004). Published at: http://edc.unige.ch
  7. 7.
    Dempsey, J.: How E-Government Interacts With Its Citizens (2003) Published at http://www.worldbank.org/transitionnewsletter/janfebmar03/pgs39-41.htm (17.9.2004)
  8. 8.
    Gibson, R., Römmele, A., Ward, S. (eds.): Electronic Democracy: Mobilisation and Participation Online. Routledge, London (2004)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hansard Society (2002), Published at http://www.intelligentcommunities.org.uk/edemocracy
  10. 10.
    IDA, European Commission upgrades "Dialogue with Citizens" service. IDA eGovernment Observatory News (2004), http://europa.eu.int/ida/en/document/3265/194 (17.9.2004)
  11. 11.
    Jeitziner, B.: Wahlen im Internetzeithalter: Informationsvermittler als politische Berater von Wählern und Politikern. In: Schaltegger, C., Schaltegger, S., Hrsg (eds.) Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, vdf Hochschulverlag, Zurich (2004)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kearns, I., Bend, J., Stern, B.: e-participation in local government. PPG, London (2002)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kies, R., Kriesi, H.: Designing Internet Voting: The Potential Impact of a Pre-Voting Public Sphere on Pre-Electoral Opinion Formation. In: Trechsel, A., Mendez, F. (eds.) The European Union and E-voting. Routledge, London (2004)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Moginier, D.: L’école vaudoise tue le Coup de sonde. Lausanne: 24Heures (13.3.04) (2004)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Norris, P.: Preaching to the Converted? Pluralism, Participation and Party Websites. Party Politics 9/1, 21–45 (2003)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    NZZ, Ausbau der Online-Dientse bei Parlament und Bund (1999), www.nzz.ch (17.9.04)
  17. 17.
    NZZ , Erster E-Parteitag in der Schweiz (2001), http://www.nzz.ch (17.9.2004)
  18. 18.
    NZZ, Internet-Diskussionsforum zur Uno (2002), http://www.nzz.ch (17.9.2004)
  19. 19.
    NZZ, Im Internet über Politik streiten (2002), http://www.nzz.ch (17.9.2004)
  20. 20.
    Schweiz, P.: Politiker chatten mit Rauch-Kallat am 15.11.2002 (2002). Published at: www.pressetext.ch/pte.mc?pte=021114023 (17.9.2004)
  21. 21.
    Petignat, Y.: Avec Smartvote.ch, votez futé aux élections fédérales. Genève: Le Temps (2003) (21.9.2004)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rosen, T. E-democracy in practice: Swedish experiences of a new tool. (2001) Published at: http://www.svekom.se/skvad/E-democracy-en.pdf (17.9.2004)
  23. 23.
    Rouiller S., et al.: Wahlumfrage 2003: Eine Umfrage unter den Benutzerinnen und Benutzer der Online-Wahlhilfe smartvote (2004), Published at: www.politools.net (17.9.2004)
  24. 24.
    Rushkoff, D.: Open Source Democracy. Demos, London (2003)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Schaffner, D.: Trotz positiver Erfahrung sollen auf der Website des eidg. Parlaments in Zukunft nur selten Diskussionen stattfinden (2002), http://www.tagesanzeiger.ch (17.9.04)
  26. 26.
    Seydtaghia, A.: Peu interactifs, les sites Web des candidats serviraient-ils avant tout à flatter leur ego? (2004), http://www.letemps.ch (17.9.2004)
  27. 27.
    Waaijenberg A.: Wahlen im Internet: Das Ende der Qual der Wahl – die Wahlplattform smarvote.ch/kandidaten.ch (2003), www.sgvw.ch (17.9.2004)
  28. 28.
    Zendali, M.: Le “Loft” fédéral, Lausanne: Le Matin (2003) 24.08.2003Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jean-Loup Chappelet
    • 1
  • Pierre Kilchenmann
    • 1
  1. 1.IDHEAP Swiss Graduate School of Public AdministrationChavannes-LausanneSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations