Public eProcurement in Action: Policies, Practices and Technologies

  • Catherine Hardy
  • Susan P. Williams
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3416)

Abstract

This paper examines how abstract governmental eProcurement policies are translated into practice. We adopt a social constructionist perspective on policy and argue that the processes of eProcurement in public sector organizations are interwoven in broader policy processes and heterogeneous networks. Using the case study method we provide an empirical illustration of how this perspective could be drawn upon to make sense of eProcurement in action.

Keywords

Public Administration Public Procurement Public Sector Organisation Government Procurement Electronic Marketplace 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Panayiotou, N.A. et al: An e-procurement system for governmental purchasing. International Journal of Production Economics. 90 (2004) 79-102 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Carayannis, E.G and Popescu, D.: Profiling a methodology for economic growth and convergence: learning from the EU e-procurement experience for central and eastern European countries. Technovation (2004) (in press) Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chu, P.-Y., et al.: Exploring success factors for Taiwan’s government electronic tendering system: behavioral perspectives from end-users. Government Information Quarterly 21(2), 219–234 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Colebatch, H.K.: Policy, 2nd edn. Open University Press, Maidenhead (2002)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    European Union: E-procurement/Italy: Catching up in Europe. Interchange of Data between Administrations (IDA) program E-Government Observatory Publications Available at (accessed on 27/8/04), http://europa.eu.int/ida/en/document/686/197
  6. 6.
    Ministero dell’Economia e delle Finanze: Italy’s Report on Economic Reform – November 2000 (from European Commission. Economic and Financial Affairs, Economic Policy Committee Archives (2001) Available at, http://europa.eu.int/comm/economy_finance/publications/epc/it-report_en.pdf (accessed on 27/8/04)
  7. 7.
    CONSIP Rationalization Program on Public Spending for goods and services, Frame Contracts System participation information document provided during presentation of 25 June (2004)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Department of Treasury and Finance - Procurement Reform Web Site Available at, http://www.dtf.wa.gov.au/cms/ref_content.asp?ID=792 (accessed on 3 September 2004)
  9. 9.
    Deloitte Touche Tomatsu: Business Solution and Implementation Plan (Deliverable C) report (accessed on 3 September 2004), Available at: http://www.dtf.wa.gov.au/cms/ref_content.asp?ID=792
  10. 10.
    AOT Consulting Pty Ltd.: Review of the GEM Purchasing E-Procurement Business System (2003), Available at: http://www.dtf.wa.gov.au/cms/pro_index.asp?id=454 (accessed on 15 July 2004)
  11. 11.
    HM Treasury & Cabinet Office: Efficiency in Civil Government Procurement. Published by The Stationery Office (July 1998) ISBN 0947819 592Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gershon, P.: Review of the Civil Service in Government (1999), Available at http://archive.treasury.gov.uk/docs/1999/pgfinalr.html (accessed on: 1st September 2004)
  13. 13.
    Scottish Executive: Efficient Government Initiative News Release (2004), Available at: http://www.scotland.gov.uk/News/Releases/2004/06/5713 (accessed on: 1st September 2004)
  14. 14.
    Law, J., Hassard, J.: Actor network theory and after. Blackwell Publishers, Oxford (1999)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Catherine Hardy
    • 1
  • Susan P. Williams
    • 1
  1. 1.Discipline of Business Information Systems, School of BusinessThe University of SydneySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations