Robust TCP (TCP-R) with Explicit Packet Drop Notification (EPDN) for Satellite Networks

  • Arjuna Sathiaseelan
  • Tomasz Radzik
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3421)

Abstract

Numerous studies have shown that packet reordering is common, especially in satellite networks. Reordering of packets decreases the TCP performance of a network, mainly because it leads to overestimation of the congestion of the network. We consider satellite networks and analyze the performance of such networks when reordering of packets occurs. We propose a solution that could significantly improve the performance of the network when reordering of packets occurs in the satellite network. We report results of our simulation experiments, which support this claim. Our solution is based on enabling the senders to distinguish between dropped packets and reordered packets.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Blanton, E., Allman, A.: On Making TCP More Robust to Packet Reordering. ACM Computer Communication Review 32(1) (2002)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chinoy, B.: ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review.  23(4), 45–52 (1993)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ward, C., Choi, H., Hain, T.: A data link control protocol for LEO satellite networks providing a reliable datagram service. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking 3(1), 91–103 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Floyd, S., Mahdavi, J., Mathis, M., Podolsky, M.: An Extension to the Selective Acknowledgement (SACK) Option for TCP, RFC 2883 (2000)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jacobson, V.: Symposium proceedings on Communications architectures and protocols, California, pp. 314–329 (1988)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    McCanne, S., Floyd, S.: Network Simulator, http://www.isi.edu/nsnam/ns/
  7. 7.
    Pattan, B.: Satellite-Based Global Cellular Communications. McGraw-Hill, New York (1997)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Postel, J.: Transmission Control Protocol, RFC 793 (1981)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sathiaseelan, A., Radzik, T.: RD-TCP: Reorder detecting TCP. In: Freire, M.M., Lorenz, P., Lee, M.M.-O. (eds.) HSNMC 2003. LNCS, vol. 2720, pp. 471–480. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sathiaseelan, A., Radzik, T.: Improving the performance of TCP in the case of packet reordering. In: Mammeri, Z., Lorenz, P. (eds.) HSNMC 2004. LNCS, vol. 3079, pp. 63–73. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zhang, M., Karp, B., Floyd, S., Peterson, L.: RR-TCP: A Reordering-Robust TCP with DSACK. In: 11th IEEE International Conference on Network Protocols (ICNP 2003), Georgia (2003)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Arjuna Sathiaseelan
    • 1
  • Tomasz Radzik
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceKing’s College LondonStrand, London

Personalised recommendations