Impact of Traffic Load on SCTP Failovers in SIGTRAN

  • Karl-Johan Grinnemo
  • Anna Brunstrom
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3420)

Abstract

With Voice over IP (VoIP) emerging as a viable alternative to the traditional circuit-switched telephony, it is vital that the two are able to intercommunicate. To this end, the IETF Signaling Transport (SIGTRAN) group has defined an architecture for seamless transportation of SS7 signaling traffic between a VoIP network and a traditional telecom network. However, at present, it is unclear if the SIGTRAN architecture will, in reality, meet the SS7 requirements, especially the stringent availability requirements. The SCTP transport protocol is one of the core components of the SIGTRAN architecture, and its failover mechanism is one of the most important availability mechanisms of SIGTRAN. This paper studies the impact of traffic load on the SCTP failover performance in an M3UA-based SIGTRAN network. The paper shows that cross traffic, especially bursty cross traffic such as SS7 signaling traffic, could indeed significantly deteriorate the SCTP failover performance. Furthermore the paper stresses the importance of configuring routers in a SIGTRAN network with relatively small queues. For example, in tests with bursty cross traffic, and with router queues twice the bandwidth-delay product, failover times were measured which were more than 50% longer than what was measured with no cross traffic at all. Furthermore, the paper also identifies some properties of the SCTP failover mechanism that could, in some cases, significantly degrade its performance.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Ong, L., Rytina, I., Garcia, M., Schwarzbauer, H., Coene, L., Lin, H., Juhasz, I., Holdrege, M., Sharp, C.: Framework architecture for signaling transport. RFC 2719, IETF (1999)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Stewart, R., Xie, Q., Morneault, K., Sharp, C., Schwarzbauer, H., Taylor, T., Rytina, I., Kalla, M., Zhang, L., Paxson, V.: Stream control transmission protocol. RFC 2960, IETF (2000)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    George, T., Bidulock, B., Dantu, R., Schwarzbauer, H.J., Morneault, K.: Signaling system 7 (SS7) message transfer part 2 (MTP2) - user peer-to-peer adaptation layer (M2PA). Internet draft, IETF (2004), draft-ietf-sigtran-m2pa-12.txtGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    ITU-T: Specifications of signalling system no. 7 - message transfer part: Signalling network functions and messages. ITU-T Recommendation 704, ITU (1996)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sidebottom, G., Morneault, K., Pastor-Balbas, J.: Signaling system 7 (SS7) message transfer part 3 (MTP3) - user adaptation layer (M3UA). RFC 3332, IETF (2002)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    ITU-T: Specifications of signalling system no. 7 - signalling connection control part: Signalling connection control part procedures. ITU-T Recommendation 714, ITU (1996)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    ITU-T: Specifications of signalling system no. 7 - ISDN user part: ISDN user part signalling procedures. ITU-T Recommendation 764, ITU (1997)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fu, S., Atiquzzaman, M.: SCTP: State of the art in research, products, and technical challenges. IEEE Communications Magazine 42, 64–76 (2004)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    ITU-T: Specifications of signalling system no. 7 - message transfer part signalling performance. ITU-T Recommendation 706, ITU (1993)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kuhn, R.: Sources of failure in the public switched telephone network. IEEE Computer 30, 31–36 (1997)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jungmaier, A., Rathgeb, E.P., Tuexen, M.: On the use of SCTP in failover scenarios. In: 6th World Multiconference on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics (SCI), Orlando, Florida, USA (2002)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Grinnemo, K.J., Brunstrom, A.: Performance of SCTP-controlled failovers in M3UA-based SIGTRAN networks. In: Advanced Simulation Technologies Conference (ASTC), Applied Telecommunication Symposium (ATS), Arlington, Virginia, USA, pp. 86–91 (2004)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Labovitz, C., Ahuja, A., Bose, A., Jahanian, F.: Delayed Internet routing convergence. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking 9, 293–306 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Scholtz, F.J.: Statistical analysis of common channel signaling system no. 7 traffic. In: 15th Internet Traffic Engineering and Traffic Management (ITC) Specialist Seminar, Wurzburg, Germany (2002)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Andersen, A.T.: Modelling of packet traffic with matrix analytic methods. PhD thesis, Informatics and Mathematical Modelling, Technical University of Denmark, DTU (1995)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Allman, M.: TCP byte counting refinements. ACM Computer Communications Review 3 (1999)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Karl-Johan Grinnemo
    • 1
  • Anna Brunstrom
    • 2
  1. 1.TietoEnator ABKarlstadSweden
  2. 2.Dept. of Computer ScienceKarlstad UniversityKarlstadSweden

Personalised recommendations