Enhancing QoS Through Alternate Path: An End-to-End Framework

  • Thierry Rakotoarivelo
  • Patrick Senac
  • Aruna Seneviratne
  • Michel Diaz
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3420)

Abstract

In the next generation Internet, the network should not only be considered as a communication medium, but also as an endless source of services available to the end-systems. These services (i.e. Overlay Applications) would be composed of multiple cooperative distributed software elements that dynamically build an ad hoc communication mesh (i.e. an Overlay Association). In this paper we propose and evaluate a collaborative distributed method to provide enhanced QoS between end-points within an overlay association.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Fu, X., et al.: Cans: Composable, adaptive network services infrastructure. In: Proc. of the UNSENIX Symposium on Internet Technologies and Systems (2001)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Raman, B., et al.: The SAHARA model for service composition across multiple providers. IEEE Pervasive Computing (2002)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rakotoarivelo, T., et al.: TOP: a Transport Overlay Protocol for Peer-to-Peer Applications. In: Proc. of International Conference on Internet Computing (2004)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wang, Z., Crowcroft, J.: QoS routing for supporting multimedia applications. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications (1996)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Savage, S., et al.: The end-to-end effects of internet path selection. In: Proc. of ACM SIGCOMM Conference (1999)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    RIPE NCC Test Traffic Measurements project, see http://www.ripe.net/test-traffic/
  7. 7.
    Beyah, R., Sivakumar, R., Copeland, J.: Application layer switching: A deployable technique for providing quality of service. In: Proc. of IEEE GLOBECOM (2003)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Clark, D., et al.: An analysis of TCP processing overhead. IEEE Communication (1989)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zhang, Y., et al.: On the Constancy of Internet Path Properties. In: Proc. of ACM SIGCOMM Internet Measurement Workshop (2001)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Brownlee, N., Claffy, K.C.: Understanding Internet traffic streams: Dragonflies and tortoises. IEEE Communications (2002)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Stoica, I., et al.: CHORD: A Scalable Peer-to-Peer lookup service for Internet Applications. In: Proc. of ACM SIGCOMM (2001)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gummadi, K.P., Saroiu, S., Gribble, S.D.: King: Estimating Latency between Arbitrary Internet End Hosts. In: Proc. SIGCOMM Internet Measurement Workshop (2002)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bovy, C.J., et al.: Analysis of end-to-end delay measurements in Internet. In: Passive and Active Measurement, PAM (2002)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Andersen, D.G., et al.: Resilient Overlay Networks. In: Proc. ACM SOSP, Canada (2001)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Li, Z., Mohapatra, P.: QRON: Qos-aware routing in overlay networks. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications (2004)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thierry Rakotoarivelo
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Patrick Senac
    • 2
    • 3
  • Aruna Seneviratne
    • 4
  • Michel Diaz
    • 3
  1. 1.University of New South WalesSydneyAustralia
  2. 2.ENSICAToulouseFrance
  3. 3.LAAS-CNRSToulouseFrance
  4. 4.National ICT AustraliaAlexandriaAustralia

Personalised recommendations