Advertisement

A System for Automated Agent Negotiation with Defeasible Logic-Based Strategies – Preliminary Report

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3323)

Abstract

This paper reports on a system for automated agent negotiation. The negotiation strategies are expressed in defeasible logic, and are applied using the implemented reasoning system DR-DEVICE. The overall system architecture is described, and a particular 1-1 negotiation scenario is presented in detail.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Maes, P., Guttman, R.H., Moukas, A.G.: Agents That Buy and Sell. Communications of the ACM 4 (March 1999)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    He, M., Jennings, N.R., Leung, H.-F.: On Agent-Mediated Electronic Commerce. IEEE transactions on knowledge and data engineering 15(4) (July/August 2003)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Flores-Mendez, R.A.: Towards a Standardization of Multi-Agent System Frameworks. ACM Crossroads – Intelligent Agents (Summer 1999)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
  5. 5.
    Labrou, Y., Finin, T., Peng, Y.: Agent Communication Languages: The current Landscape. IEEE Intelligent Systems (March/April 1999)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    FIPA Interaction Protocols Specification, http://www.fipa.org/repository/ips.php3
  7. 7.
    JADE Project, http://jade.cselt.it/
  8. 8.
    Bellifemine, F., Caire, G., Poggi, A., Rimassa, G.: JADE A White Paper. Telecom Italia EXP Magazine 3(3) (September 2003)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dumas, M., Governatori, G., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Oaks, P.: A Formal Approach to Negotiating Agents Development. Elsevier Science – Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 1(2), 193–207 (Summer 2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Su, S.Y.W., Huang, C., Hammer, J.: A Replicable Webbased Negotiation Server for E-Commerce. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (2000)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tsang, E., Gosling, T.: Simple Constrained Bargaining Game. In: Proceedings of the Distributed Constrained Satisfaction Workshop-First International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (AAMAS), Bologna, Italy (2002)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bassiliades, N., Antoniou, G., Vlahavas, I.: A Defeasible Logic Reasoner for the Semantic Web. In: Antoniou, G., Boley, H. (eds.) RuleML 2004. LNCS, vol. 3323, pp. 49–64. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    van Aart, C., Pels, R., Caire, G., Bergenti, F.: Creating and Using Ontologies in Agent Communication. Telecom Italia EXP Magazine 2(3) (September 2002)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nute, D.: Defeasible logic. In: Handbook of logic in artificial intelligence and logic programming. Nonmonotonic reasoning and uncertain reasoning, vol. 3. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1994)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Grosof, B.N.: Prioritized conflict handing for logic programs. In: Proc. of the 1997 International Symposium on Logic Programming, pp. 197–211 (1997)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Antoniou, G., Billington, D., Governatori, G., Maher, M.J.: Representation results for defeasible logic. ACM Transactions on Computational Logic 2(2), 255–287 (2001)zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Antoniou, G., Maher, M.J., Billington, D.: Defeasible Logic versus Logic Programming without Negation as Failure. Journal of Logic Programming 41(1) (2000)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jennings, N.R., Parsons, S., Sierra, C., Faratin, P.: Automated Negotiation. In: Proceedings of 5th Int. Conf. on the Practical Application of Intelligent Agents and Multi- Agent Systems, PAAM 2000 (2000)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceUniversity of CreteHerakleionGreece
  2. 2.Institute of Computer Science, FO.R.T.HHerakleionGreece
  3. 3.Department of InformaticsAristotle University of ThessalonikiThessalonikiGreece

Personalised recommendations