Risk Minimization Based Ontology Mapping

  • Jie Tang
  • Bang-Yong Liang
  • Juanzi Li
  • Kehong Wang
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3309)

Abstract

The key point to reach interoperability over distributed ontologies is the mediation between them, called ontology mapping. Absolutely manually specified mapping is tedious and time consumption. Additional, how to ensure the consistency and deal with error prone in manual process, further how to maintain the mapping with the evolution of ontologies are all beyond manual work. Therefore, it is indeed necessary to automatically discover the mapping between ontologies so that mergence and translation of different ontology-based annotations become possible. Existing (semi-)automatic processing system are restricted to limited information, which depress the performance especially when the taxonomy structures have little overlapping or the instances have few commons. In this paper, based on Bayesian decision theory, we propose an approach called RiMOM to automatically discover mapping between ontologies. RiMOM treats the entire mapping problem as a decision problem instead of similarity problem in previous work. It explicitly and formally gives a complete decision model for ontology mapping. Based on shallow NLP, this paper also introduces a method to deal with instances heterogeneity, which is a long-standing problem for information processing. Experiments on real world data show that RiMOM is promising.

Keywords

Prefix Suffix 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Maedche, A., Staab, S.: Ontology Learning for the Semantic Web. IEEE Intelligent Systems 16(2), 72–79 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berger, J.: Statistical decision theory and Bayesian analysis. Springer, Heidelberg (1985)MATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Calvanese, D., De Giacomo, G., Lenzerini, M.: A framework for ontology integration. In: Cruz, I., Decker, S., Euzenat, J., McGuinness, D. (eds.) The Emerging Semantic Web, pp. 201–214. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2002)Google Scholar
  4. Cunningham, H., Maynard, D., Bontcheva, K., Tablan, V.: GATE: A Framework and Graphical Development Environment for Robust NLP Tools and Applications. In: Proceedings of the 40th Anniversary Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (2002)Google Scholar
  5. Doan, A., Madhavan, J., Domingos, P., Halevy, A.: Learning to map between ontologies on the semantic web. In: Proceedings of the World-Wide Web Conference (WWW 2002), pp. 662–673. ACM Press, New York (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Maedche, A., Moltik, B., Silva, N., Volz, R.: MAFRA – An Ontology MApping FRAmework in the Context of the Semantic Web. In: Gómez-Pérez, A., Benjamins, V.R. (eds.) EKAW 2002. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2473, p. 235. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Maedche, A., Motik, B., Silva, N., Volz, R.: MAFRA – A Mapping Framework for Distributed Ontologies. In: Gómez-Pérez, A., Benjamins, V.R. (eds.) EKAW 2002. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2473, pp. 235–250. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. McGuinness, D., Fikes, R., Rice, J., Wilder, S.: An environment for merging and testing large ontologies. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, Colorado, USAGoogle Scholar
  9. Noy, N.F., Musen, M.A.: PROMPT: Algorithm and Tool for Automated Ontology Merging and Alignment. In: Proc. of AAAI 2000, pp. 450-455 (2000)Google Scholar
  10. Silva, N., Rocha, J.: Semantic Web Complex Ontology Mapping. In: IEEE/WIC International Conference on Web Intelligence (WI 2003), Halifax, Canada, October 13-17, pp. 82–100 (2003)Google Scholar
  11. Omelayenko, B.: RDFT: A Mapping Meta-Ontology for Business Integration. In: Workshop on Knowledge Transformation for the Semantic Web (KTSW 2002) at ECAI 2002, Lyon, France, pp. 76–83 (2002)Google Scholar
  12. Park, J.Y., Gennari, J.H., Musen, M.A.: Mappings for Reuse in Knowledge-based Systems. In: 11th Workshop on Knowledge Acquisition, Modelling and Management (KAW 1998), Banff, Canada (1998)Google Scholar
  13. Patrick, P., Dekang, L.: Discovering Word Senses from Text. In: Proceedings of ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining 2002, pp. 613–619 (2002)Google Scholar
  14. Stuckenschmidt, H., Wache, H.: Context Modeling and Transformation for Semantic Interoperability. In: Workshop of Knowledge Representation meets Databases (KRDB 2000) at ECAI 2000, Berlin, Germany, pp. 115–126 (2000)Google Scholar
  15. Berners-Lee, T., Fischetti, M. (Contributor), Dertouzos, M.L.: Weaving the Web: The Original Design and Ultimate Destiny of the World Wide Web (1999)Google Scholar
  16. Wache, H., Voegele, T., Visser, U., Stuckenschmidt, et al.: Ontology-based integration of information – a survey of existing approaches. In: Proc. of IJCAI 2001 Workshop on Ontologies and Information Sharing (2001)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jie Tang
    • 1
  • Bang-Yong Liang
    • 1
  • Juanzi Li
    • 1
  • Kehong Wang
    • 1
  1. 1.Knowledge Engineering Group, Department of ComputerTsinghua UniversityP.R. China

Personalised recommendations