Smart Virtual Counterparts for Learning Communities

  • Mohan Baruwal Chhetri
  • Shonali Krishnaswamy
  • Seng Wai Loke
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3307)

Abstract

Virtual learning environments can be greatly improved if they can provide location independent services and personalized interactions to the learning community. One way of achieving this is by having smart virtual counterparts to represent the users in the virtual learning environment. We propose that mobile agent technology is aptly suited for providing such smart virtual counterparts to represent learners, teachers and institutions in the virtual learning community.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Barajas, M., Owen, M.: Implementing Virtual Learning Environments: Looking for Holistic Approach. Educational Technology & Society 3(3) (2000)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dillenbourg, P.: Virtual Learning Environments. In: EUN Conference 2000: Workshop on Virtual Learning Environments (2000)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bouras, C., Philopoulos, A., Tsiatox, T.: A Neworked Intelligent Distributed Virtual Training Environment: A First Approach. In: 5th Joint Conference on Information Sciences-JCIS 2000-1st International Workshop on Intelligent Multimedia Computing and Networking, Taj Mahal, Atlantic City, New Jersey, USA, vol. 2, pp. 604–607 (2000)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zakaria, A., Siraj, F., Ahdon, M.F., Hussin, M., Zaidil Adha, M.: PEAGENT: An Interactive Web-Based Educational System Using Animated Pedagogical Agent. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Artificial Intelligence Application in Engineering and Information Technology (ICAIET 2002), Hotel Sutera Magellan, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, June 17-18 (2002)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Weiβ, G.: Agent Orientation in Software Engineering. Knowledge Engineering Review 16(4), 349–373 (2002)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gray, R., Kotz, D., Nog, S., Rus, D., Cybenko, G.: Mobile agents: the next generation in distributed computing. In: Proceedings of the Second Aizu International Symposium on Parallel Algorithms/Architecture Synthesis, pp. 8–24 (1997)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hong, H., Kinshuk: Mobile Agents in Adaptive Learning Systems. In: The Proceedings of the IEEE International Workshop on Wireless and Mobile Technologies in Education, WMTE 2002 (2002)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    De Berardina, C., Pizzutilo, S.: A MultiAgent Infrastructure supporting Personalized Interaction with Smart Environments. In: Proceedings of Workshop on Ubiquitous Agents on embedded, wearable, and mobile devices held in conjunction with the 2002 Conference on Autonomous Agents & Multiagent Systems, AAMAS 2002 (2002)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kindberg, T., et al.: People, Places, Things: Web Presence for the Real World. In: The 3rd IEEE Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications, December 7-8, pp. 19–28 (2000)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Romer, K., Schoch, T., Mattern, F., Dubendorfer, T.D.: Smart identification frameworks for ubiquitous computing applications. In: Proceedings of the 1st IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications (PerCom 2003), March 23-26, pp. 253–262 (2003)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fox, B., Johanson, P.H., Winograd, T.: Integrating Information Appliances into an Interactive Workspace. IEEE Computer Graphics & Applications, 20 (3) (May/June 2000)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kidd, C.D., Orr, R., Abowd, G.D., Atkeson, C.G., Essa, I.A., MacIntyre, B., Mynatt, E., Starner, T.E., Newstetter, W.: The Aware Home: A Living Laboratory for Ubiquitous Computing Research. In: The Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Cooperative Buildings – CoBuild 1999 (1999)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Grasshopper 2 – The Agent Platform at, http://www.grasshopper.de/
  14. 14.
    OMG (1995), Common Facilities RFP3, Request for Proposal OMG TC Document 95-11- 3 (November 1995) MASIF specification is available through, http://www.omg.org/, http://www.omg.org/
  15. 15.
    Saha, D., Mukherjee, A.: Pervasive Computing: a paradigm for the 21st century. Computer 36(3), 25–31 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mavrommati, I.: Situatied Interaction in an educational setting: Position paper in on 11th, http://www.teco.edu/chi2000ws/papers/25_mavrommati.pdf accessed (February 2004)
  17. 17.
    Hong, H., Kinshuk, H.X., Patel, A., Jesshope, C.: Application of Mobile agents in Webbased Learning environment. In: Montgomerie, C., Viteli, J. (eds.) Proceedings of Ed-Media 2001, Tampere, Finland, AACE, Vancouver (2001) ISBN 1-880094-42-8Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Perez, P., Mendez, G., de Antonio, A.: mIVA: Why to Use Mobile Agents in Virtual Environments and Wireless Devices. In: ECAI 2002, 15th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Workshop W6, Artificial Intelligence in Mobile System, Lyon, France (July 2002)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mohan Baruwal Chhetri
    • 1
  • Shonali Krishnaswamy
    • 1
  • Seng Wai Loke
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Computer Science and Software EngineeringMonash University 

Personalised recommendations