A Polynomial-Time Algorithm for the Matching of Crossing Contact-Map Patterns

  • Jens Gramm
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3240)

Abstract

Contact maps are a model to capture the core information in the structure of biological molecules, e.g., proteins. A contact map consists of an ordered set S of elements (representing a protein’s sequence of amino acids), and a set A of element pairs of S, called arcs (representing amino acids which are closely neighbored in the structure). Given two contact maps (S,A) and (Sp,Ap) with |A|≥ |Ap|, the Contact Map Pattern Matching (CMPM) problem asks whether the “pattern” (Sp,Ap) “occurs” in (S,A), i.e., informally stated, whether there is a subset of |Ap| arcs in A whose arc structure coincides with Ap. CMPM captures the biological question of finding structural motifs in protein structures. In general, CMPM is NP-hard. In this paper, we show that CMPM is solvable in O(|A|6|Ap|2) time when the pattern is \(\{<,\between\}\)-structured, i.e., when each two arcs in the pattern are disjoint or crossing. Our algorithm extends to other closely related models. In particular, it answers an open question raised by Vialette that, rephrased in terms of contact maps, asked whether CMPM for \(\{<,\between\}\)-structured patterns is NP-hard or solvable in polynomial time. Our result stands in sharp contrast to the NP-hardness of closely related problems. We provide experimental results which show that contact maps derived from real protein structures can be processed efficiently.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Alber, J., Gramm, J., Guo, J., Niedermeier, R.: Computing the similarity of two sequences with nested arc annotations. Theoretical Computer Science 312, 337–358 (2004)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Berman, H.M., et al.: The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Research 28, 235–242 (2000), http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/ CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Blin, G., Fertin, G., Vialette, S.: New results for the 2-interval pattern problem. In: Proc. of the 15th CPM. LNCS, Springer, Heidelberg (2004) (to appear)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Evans, P.A.: Finding common subsequences with arcs and pseudoknots. In: Crochemore, M., Paterson, M. (eds.) CPM 1999. LNCS, vol. 1645, pp. 270–280. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gramm, J., Guo, J., Niedermeier, R.: Pattern matching for arc-annotated sequences. In: Agrawal, M., Seth, A.K. (eds.) FSTTCS 2002. LNCS, vol. 2556, pp. 182–193. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Goldman, D., Istrail, S., Papadimitriou, C.H.: Algorithmic aspects of protein structure similarity. In: Proc. of the 40th FOCS, pp. 512–521. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (1999)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Harrison, M.A.: Introduction to Formal Language Theory. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1978)MATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jiang, T., Lin, G.-H., Ma, B., Zhang, K.: The Longest Common Subsequence problem for arc-annotated sequences. In: Giancarlo, R., Sankoff, D. (eds.) CPM 2000. LNCS, vol. 1848, pp. 154–165. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lancia, G., Carr, R., Walenz, B., Istrail, S.: 1001 optimal PDB structure alignments: Integer Programming methods for finding the maximum contact map overlap. Journal of Computational Biology 11(1), 27–52 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Orengo, C.A., Michie, A.D., Jones, S., Jones, D.T., Swindells, M.B., Thornton, J.M.: CATH – A Hierarchic Classification of Protein Domain Structures. Structure 5(8), 1093–1108 (1997), http://www.biochem.ucl.ac.uk/bsm/cath/ CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wang, Z., Zhang, K.: RNA secondary structure prediction. In: Jiang, T., et al. (eds.) Current Topics in Computational Molecular Biology, pp. 345–364. MIT Press, Cambridge (2002)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Vialette, S.: On the computational complexity of 2-interval pattern matching problems. Theoretical Computer Science 312(2-3), 223–249 (2004)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jens Gramm
    • 1
  1. 1.International Computer Science InstituteBerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations