Adaptive Weighted Particle Swarm Optimisation for Multi-objective Optimal Design of Alloy Steels

  • Mahdi Mahfouf
  • Min-You Chen
  • Derek Arthur Linkens
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3242)

Abstract

In this paper, a modified Particle Swarm Optimisation (PSO) algorithm is presented to improve the performance of multi-objective optimisation. The PSO algorithm search capabilities are enhanced via the inclusion of the adaptive inertia weight and acceleration factor. In addition, a weighted aggregation function has been introduced within the algorithm to guide the selection of the personal and global bests, together with a non-dominated sorting algorithm to select the particles from one iteration to another. The proposed algorithm has been successfully applied to a series of well-known benchmark functions as well as to the multi-objective optimal design of alloy steels, which aims at determining the optimal heat treatment regimes and the required weight percentages for the chemical composites in order to obtain the pre-defined mechanical properties of the material. The results have shown that the algorithm can locate the constrained optimal design with a very good accuracy

Keywords

Pareto Front Particle Swarm Optimisation Algorithm Inertia Weight Pareto Solution Modify Particle Swarm Optimisation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Kennedy, J., Eberhart, R.: Particle Swarm Optimization, Neural Networks, Perth, Australia, pp. 1942–1948 (1995)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kennedy, J.: The Particle Swarm: Social adaptation of knowledge. In: Proc. 1997 Int. Conf. Evolutionary Computation, Indianapolis, IN, pp. 303–308 (1997)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kennedy, J.: Stereotyping: Improving Particle Swarm Performance with Cluster Analysis. Evolutionary Computation, La Jolla, CA, 1507–1512 (2000)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Angeline, P.J.: Evolutionary Optimization Versus Particle Swarm Optimization: Philosophy and Performance Differences. LNCS, pp. 601–610 (1998)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Eberhart, R., Shi, Y.: Comparison between Genetic Algorithms and Particle Swarm Optimisation. LNCS, pp. 611–618 (1998)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Shi, Y., Eberhart, R.: Empirical Study of Particle Swarm Optimization, Evolutionary Computation, Washington DC, pp. 1945–1950 (1999)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Shi, Y., Eberhart, R.: Fuzzy Adaptive Particle Swarm Optimization, Congress on Evolutionary Computation, Seoul, Korea, pp. 101–106 (2001)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zhang, L.H., Hu, S.: A New Approach to Improve Particle Swarm Optimization. In: Cantú-Paz, E., Foster, J.A., Deb, K., Davis, L., Roy, R., O’Reilly, U.-M., Beyer, H.-G., Kendall, G., Wilson, S.W., Harman, M., Wegener, J., Dasgupta, D., Potter, M.A., Schultz, A., Dowsland, K.A., Jonoska, N., Miller, J., Standish, R.K. (eds.) GECCO 2003. LNCS, vol. 2723, pp. 134–139. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Deb, K., Agrawal, S., Pratap, A., Meyarivan, T.: A Fast Elitist Non-Dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm for Multi-Objective Optimization: NSGA-II. In: Proceedings of Parallel Problem Solving from Nature-PPSN VI, pp. 849–858. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Deb, K., Goel, T.: Controlled Elitist Non-Dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithms for Better Convergence. In: Zitzler, E., Deb, K., Thiele, L., Coello Coello, C.A., Corne, D.W. (eds.) EMO 2001. LNCS, vol. 1993, pp. 67–81. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Li, X.: A Non-dominated Sorting Particle Swarm Optimizer for Muli-objective Optimization. In: Cantú-Paz, E., Foster, J.A., Deb, K., Davis, L., Roy, R., O’Reilly, U.-M., Beyer, H.-G., Kendall, G., Wilson, S.W., Harman, M., Wegener, J., Dasgupta, D., Potter, M.A., Schultz, A., Dowsland, K.A., Jonoska, N., Miller, J., Standish, R.K. (eds.) GECCO 2003. LNCS, vol. 2723, pp. 37–48. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Deb, K.: Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms. Wiley, New York (2001)MATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mahfouf, M., Jamei, M., Linkens, D.A.: Optimal Design of Metals using Fuzzy Specified Multi-Objective Functions. In: IFAC Fuzzy-GA (2004)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chen, M.-Y., Linkens, D.A.: A Systematic Neuro-fuzzy Modeling Framework with Application to Material Property Prediction. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part B 31(5), 781–790 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mahdi Mahfouf
    • 1
    • 2
  • Min-You Chen
    • 1
    • 2
  • Derek Arthur Linkens
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute for Microstructure and Mechanical Properties EngineeringThe University of Sheffield (IMMPETUS) 
  2. 2.Department of Automatic Control and Systems EngineeringThe University of SheffieldSheffieldUK

Personalised recommendations