Uncoordinated Load Balancing and Congestion Games in P2P Systems
In P2P systems, users often have many choices of peers from whom to download their data. Each user cares primarily about its own response time, which depends on how many other users also choose that same peer. This interaction is best modeled as a game among self-interested agents, which we call uncoordinated load balancing. The players in this game are the rational and strategic users who are free to act in their own self-interest. We describe some of our recent work on this problem, and propose several new research directions, including analyzing Nash equilibria under general latency functions, a cost to switch servers, settings where user groups are dynamic, as well as the complexity of finding Nash solutions, and incentives for peers to be truthful in revealing their load.
KeywordsNash Equilibrium Load Balance Switching Cost Latency Function Competitive Ratio
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Awerbuch, A., Azar, A., Grove, E.F., Krishnan, P., Kao, M.Y., Vitter, J.S.: Load balancing in the Lp norm. In: Proc. 36th FOCS, pp. 383–391 (1995)Google Scholar
- 3.Czumaj, A., Vöcking, B.: Tight bounds for worst-case equilibria. In: Proc. 13th SODA, pp. 413–420 (2002)Google Scholar
- 5.Kothari, A., Suri, S., Tóth, C.D., Zhou, Y.: On a server selection game among selfish clients (in preparation)Google Scholar
- 7.Nisan, N., Ronen, A.: Computationally feasible VCG mechanisms. In: Proc. 2nd Conf. on EC, pp. 242–252 (2000)Google Scholar
- 8.Papadimitriou, C.: Algorithms, games, and the Internet. In: Proc. 33rd STOC, pp. 749–753 (2001)Google Scholar
- 10.Roughgarden, T.: Selfish Routing. PhD thesis, Cornell University (2002)Google Scholar
- 12.Roussopoulos, M., Baker, M.: CUP: Controlled Update Propagation in Peer-to-Peer networks. In: USENIX Annual Technical Conference, pp. 167–180 (2003)Google Scholar
- 13.Suri, S., Tóth, C.D., Zhou, Y.: Selfish load balancing and atomic congestion games. In: Proc. 20th SoCG (2004) (to appear)Google Scholar