Developing Learning by Teaching Environments That Support Self-Regulated Learning

  • Gautam Biswas
  • Krittaya Leelawong
  • Kadira Belynne
  • Karun Viswanath
  • Daniel Schwartz
  • Joan Davis
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3220)

Abstract

Betty’s Brain is a teachable agent system in the domain of river ecosystems that combines learning by teaching and self-regulation strategies to promote deep learning and understanding. Scaffolds in the form of hypertext resources, a Mentor agent, and a set of quiz questions help novice students learn and self-assess their own knowledge. The computational architecture is implemented as a multi-agent system to allow flexible and incremental design, and to provide a more realistic social context for interactions between students and the teachable agent. An extensive study that compared three versions of this system: a tutor only version, learning by teaching, and learning by teaching with self-regulation strategies demonstrates the effectiveness of learning by teaching environments, and the impact of self-regulation strategies in improving preparation for learning among novice learners.

Keywords

Lester 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Wenger, E.: Artificial Intelligence and Tutoring Systems. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, California (1987)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brusilovsky, P.: Adaptive and Intelligent Technologies for Web-based Education. In: Rollinger, C., Peylo, C. (eds.) Special Issue on Intelligent Systems and Teleteaching, vol. 4, pp. 19–25 (1999)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Palinscar, A.S., Brown, A.L.: Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension -monitoring activities. Cognition and instruction 1, 117–175 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chi, M.T.H., De Leeuw, N., Mei-Hung, C., Levancher, C.: Eliciting self explanations. Cognitive Science 18, 439–477 (1994)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chi, M.T.H., et al.: Learning from Human Tutoring. Cognitive Science 25(4), 471–533 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Biswas, G., Schwartz, D., Bransford, J., The Teachable Agents Group at Vanderbilt University: Technology Support for Complex Problem Solving: From SAD Environments to AI. In: Forbus, Feltovich (eds.) Smart Machines in Education, pp. 71–98. AAAI Press, Menlo Park (2001)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Artzt, A.F., Armour-Thomas, E.: Cognitive Model for Examining Teachers’ Instructional Practice in Mathematics: A Guide for Facilitating Teacher Reflection. Educational Studies in Mathematics 40(3), 211–335 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Clarebout, G., Elen, J., Johnson, W.L., Shaw, E.: Animated Pedagogical Agents: An Opportunity to be Grasped? Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia 11, 267–286 (2002)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Johnson, W., Rickel, J.W., Lester, J.C.: Animated Pedagogical Agents: Faceto- Face Interaction in Interactive Learning Environments. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 11, 47–78 (2001)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Moreno, R., Mayer, R.E.: Learning science in virtual reality multimedia environments: Role of methods and media. Journal of Educational Psychology 94, 598–610 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nichols, D.M.: Intelligent Student Systems: an application of viewpoints to intelligent learning environments, Ph.D. thesis, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK (1994)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Butler, D.L., Winne, P.H.: Feedback and Self-Regulated Learning: A Theoretical Synthesis. Review of Educational Research 65(3), 245–281 (1995)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Novak, J.D.: Concept Mapping as a tool for improving science teaching and learning. In: Treagust, D.F., Duit, R., Fraser, B.J. (eds.) Improving Teaching and Learning in Science and Mathematics, pp. 32–43. Teachers College Press, London (1996)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Leelawong, K., et al.: Teachable Agents: Learning by Teaching Environments for Science Domains. In: Proc. 15th Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence Conf., Acapulco, Mexico, pp. 109–116 (2003)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Leelawong, K., Wang, Y., et al.: Qualitative reasoning techniques to support learning by teaching: The Teachable Agents project. In: 15th International Workshop on Qualitative Reasoning, San Antonio, Texas, pp. 73–80. AAAI Press, Menlo Park (2001)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zimmerman, B.J.: A Social Cognitive View of Self-Regulated Academic Learning. Journal of Educational Psychology 81(3), 329–339 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pintrich, P.R., DeGroot, E.V.: Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology 82, 33–40 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Labrou, Y., Finin, T., Peng, Y.: Agent Communication Languages: The Current Landscape. IEEE Intelligent Systems 14(2), 45–52 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gautam Biswas
    • 1
  • Krittaya Leelawong
    • 1
  • Kadira Belynne
    • 1
  • Karun Viswanath
    • 1
  • Daniel Schwartz
    • 2
  • Joan Davis
    • 2
  1. 1.Dept. of EECS & ISISVanderbilt UniversityNashvilleUSA
  2. 2.School of EducationStanford UniversityStanfordUSA

Personalised recommendations