Advertisement

Web-Based Evaluations Showing Differential Learning for Tutorial Strategies Employed by the Ms. Lindquist Tutor

  • Neil T. Heffernan
  • Ethan A. Croteau
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3220)

Abstract

In a previous study, Heffernan and Koedinger [6] reported upon the Ms. Lindquist tutoring system that uses dialog and Heffernan conducted a web-based evaluation [7]. The previous evaluation considered students coming from three separate teachers and analyzed the individual learning gains based on the number of problems completed depending on the tutoring strategy provided. This paper examines a set of new web-based experiments. One set of experiments is targeted at determining if a differential learning gain exists between two of the tutoring strategies provided. Another set of experiments is used to determine if student motivation is dependent on the tutoring strategy. We replicate some findings from [7] with regard to the learning and motivation benefits of Ms Lindquist’s intelligent tutorial dialog. These experiments related to learning report on over 1,000 participants contributing at most 20 minutes each, for a grand total of over 200+ combined student hours.

Keywords

Student Motivation Learning Gain Pretest Score Verbal Strategy Cognitive Tutor 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Aleven, V., Popescu, O., Koedinger, K.R.: Towards tutorial dialog to support selfexplanation: Adding natural language understanding to a cognitive tutor. In: Moore, Redfield, Johnson (eds.) Proceedings of Artificial Intelligence in Education 2001, IOS Press, Amsterdam (2001)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Birnbaum, M.H. (ed.): Psychological Experiments on the Internet. Academic Press, San Diego (2000), http://psych.fullerton.edu/mbirnbaum/web/IntroWeb.htm Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    CIRCSIM-Tutor (2002), See http://www.csam.iit.edu/~circsim/
  4. 4.
    Graesser, A.C., Wiemer-Hastings, P., Wiemer-Hastings, K., Harter, D., Person, N., the TRG: Using latent semantic analysis to evaluate the contributions of students in AutoTutor. Interactive Learning Environments (in press)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Heffernan, N.T.: Intelligent Tutoring Systems have Forgotten the Tutor: Adding a Cognitive Model of an Experienced Human Tutor. Dissertation & Technical Report. Carnegie Mellon University, Computer Science (2001), http://www.algebratutor.org/pubs.html
  6. 6.
    Heffernan, N.T., Koedinger, K.R.: An intelligent tutoring system incorporating a model of an experienced human tutor. In: Sixth International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (2002)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Heffernan, N.T.: Web-Based Evaluations Showing both Cognitive and Motivational Benefits of the Ms. Lindquist Tutor. In: 11th International Conference Artificial Intelligence in Education. Sydney, Australia (2003)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rosé, C., Jordan, P., Ringenberg, M., Siler, S., VanLehn, K., Weinstein, A.: Interactive conceptual Tutoring in Atlas-Andes. In: Proceedings of AI in Education 2001 Conference (2001)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Neil T. Heffernan
    • 1
  • Ethan A. Croteau
    • 1
  1. 1.Computer Science DepartmentWorcester Polytechnic InstituteWorcesterUSA

Personalised recommendations